Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics

IF 1 Q2 LINGUISTICS

AILA Review Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1075/AILA.29.01PER

M. Pérez-Milans

引用次数: 25

Abstract

Recently, attempts have been made to revise foundational categories in Applied Linguistics (AL, hereafter). Following up on Brumfit’s (1995) definition of the field as the theoretical and empirical investigation of real-world problems in which language is a central issue, Lillis (2015) invites us to re-theorize the dominant approaches to the very concepts of language and communication. A similar endeavor can also be noted in Block’s call for more explicit theoretical attention to social class as a construct in applied linguistics (2014). This interest in theoretical revisiting echoes earlier statements by Sarangi and Candlin (2003) in their editorial in the inaugural issue of Journal of Applied Linguistics:

查看原文本刊更多论文

应用语言学中的反身性与社会变迁

近年来，人们尝试对应用语言学的基本范畴进行修订。继Brumfit(1995)将该领域定义为对以语言为中心问题的现实世界问题的理论和实证调查之后，Lillis(2015)邀请我们重新理论化语言和交流概念的主要方法。在Block呼吁在应用语言学中将社会阶级作为一种结构进行更明确的理论关注中，也可以注意到类似的努力(2014)。这种对理论重审的兴趣呼应了Sarangi和Candlin(2003)在《应用语言学杂志》创刊号上的社论:

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AILA Review LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： AILA Review is a refereed publication of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée, an international federation of national associations for applied linguistics. All volumes are guest edited. As of volume 16, 2003, AILA Review is published with John Benjamins. This journal is peer reviewed and indexed in: Scopus