Compliance with international guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for elective surgeries at a tertiary-level hospital in the Philippines

Healthcare infection Pub Date : 2015-09-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-17 DOI:10.1071/HI15018
Maria Isabel P. Nabor MD , Brian S. Buckley PhD , Marie Carmela M. Lapitan MD
{"title":"Compliance with international guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for elective surgeries at a tertiary-level hospital in the Philippines","authors":"Maria Isabel P. Nabor MD ,&nbsp;Brian S. Buckley PhD ,&nbsp;Marie Carmela M. Lapitan MD","doi":"10.1071/HI15018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of morbidity, associated with extended hospital stays, increasing costs and even death. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has been proven to prevent SSIs. Guidelines have been published to promote best practice but studies continue to highlight poor compliance.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to assess adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in common surgical operations in the teaching hospital of the national university in the Philippines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a medical records-based, cross-sectional study. Common surgical procedures included were breast surgery, enterostomy closure, open and laparoscopic colectomy, and open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed from December 2013 to March 2014. Data were extracted relating to patients’ demographic characteristics, types of surgery, prophylactic antibiotic choice, route, dose, timing, redosing and duration of prophylaxis. Observed antibiotic prophylaxis was compared with guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 244 cases that warranted prophylaxis, 93% were given antibiotics. Of these, 44% conformed with the guideline for type of antibiotic, 39% for dose, 100% for route, 45% for timing, 93% for redosing, and 67% for duration. Only 13% conformed to guidelines for all parameters of prophylaxis. Most cholecystectomies received Cefuroxime, no longer recommended by latest international guidelines. Of the laparoscopic surgeries, 38% received antibiotics earlier than the 1 hour before surgery recommended in latest guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ensuring surgeons fully follow guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis remains a challenge, as highlighted by this study and others conducted around the world. Awareness-raising initiatives might be beneficial at institutional level to improve compliance with best practice guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI15018","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of morbidity, associated with extended hospital stays, increasing costs and even death. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has been proven to prevent SSIs. Guidelines have been published to promote best practice but studies continue to highlight poor compliance.

Objective

This study aimed to assess adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in common surgical operations in the teaching hospital of the national university in the Philippines.

Methods

This was a medical records-based, cross-sectional study. Common surgical procedures included were breast surgery, enterostomy closure, open and laparoscopic colectomy, and open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed from December 2013 to March 2014. Data were extracted relating to patients’ demographic characteristics, types of surgery, prophylactic antibiotic choice, route, dose, timing, redosing and duration of prophylaxis. Observed antibiotic prophylaxis was compared with guidelines.

Results

Of the 244 cases that warranted prophylaxis, 93% were given antibiotics. Of these, 44% conformed with the guideline for type of antibiotic, 39% for dose, 100% for route, 45% for timing, 93% for redosing, and 67% for duration. Only 13% conformed to guidelines for all parameters of prophylaxis. Most cholecystectomies received Cefuroxime, no longer recommended by latest international guidelines. Of the laparoscopic surgeries, 38% received antibiotics earlier than the 1 hour before surgery recommended in latest guidelines.

Conclusions

Ensuring surgeons fully follow guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis remains a challenge, as highlighted by this study and others conducted around the world. Awareness-raising initiatives might be beneficial at institutional level to improve compliance with best practice guidelines.

菲律宾一家三级医院在选择性手术中遵守关于抗生素预防的国际准则
背景手术部位感染(ssi)是发病的主要原因,与住院时间延长、费用增加甚至死亡有关。围手术期抗生素预防已被证明可以预防ssi。已经发布了促进最佳实践的指导方针,但研究继续强调遵守情况不佳。目的本研究旨在评估菲律宾国立大学教学医院普通外科手术中抗生素预防指南的遵守情况。方法本研究是一项基于医疗记录的横断面研究。常见的手术包括2013年12月至2014年3月期间进行的乳房手术、肠造口术、开放式腹腔镜结肠切除术和开放式腹腔镜胆囊切除术。提取与患者人口统计学特征、手术类型、预防性抗生素选择、途径、剂量、时间、再给药和预防持续时间有关的数据。观察到的抗生素预防与指南进行比较。结果244例需要预防的病例中,93%给予抗生素治疗。其中,44%符合抗生素类型指南,39%符合剂量指南,100%符合途径指南,45%符合时间指南,93%符合重新给药指南,67%符合持续时间指南。只有13%的人符合所有预防参数的指导方针。大多数胆囊切除术使用头孢呋辛,最新的国际指南不再推荐使用头孢呋辛。在腹腔镜手术中,38%的患者在手术前1小时前接受了抗生素治疗。结论确保外科医生完全遵循抗生素预防指南仍然是一个挑战,正如本研究和世界各地进行的其他研究所强调的那样。提高认识的举措可能有利于在机构一级改进对最佳做法准则的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书