Brett G. Mitchell PhD, M.Adv.Prac., BN, DTN , Wilhelmine Digney BN , John K. Ferguson MBBS, DTM&H, FRACP (Infectious Diseases), FRCPA (Microbiology)
{"title":"Prior room occupancy increases risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition","authors":"Brett G. Mitchell PhD, M.Adv.Prac., BN, DTN , Wilhelmine Digney BN , John K. Ferguson MBBS, DTM&H, FRACP (Infectious Diseases), FRCPA (Microbiology)","doi":"10.1071/HI14023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Australia, little is known about the risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) from prior room occupants. The aims of the study are to understand the risk of MRSA acquisition from prior room occupants and to further extend the existing knowledge-base on the role of discharge cleaning in hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A non-concurrent cohort study was undertaken in five wards at a 250-bed general hospital in Tasmania, Australia. All admitted patients were screened for MRSA. Weekly screenings for all patients who remained in hospital were undertaken. New MRSA acquisitions were identified. The exposed group were patients whose immediate prior room occupant had MRSA, while the unexposed prior room occupant did not have MRSA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>6228 patients were at risk of acquiring MRSA, with 237 new MRSA acquisitions equating to an acquisition rate of 3.8% for each at-risk patient admission. The unadjusted odds ratio for acquiring MRSA when the prior room occupant had MRSA was 2.9 (95% CI 2.2–3.9). Using logistic regression, exposure to a prior occupant harbouring MRSA remained a significant predictor of subsequent acquisition, after controlling for variables, OR 2.7 (95% CI 2.0–3.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Admission to a room previously occupied by a person with MRSA increased the odds of acquisition forthe subsequentpatient, independent of other risk factors. It demonstrates the necessity of having effective discharge cleaning practices in place. We believe increased attention to discharge room cleaning in hospitals is required and the reconsideration of additional recommendations for discharge cleaning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI14023","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Background
In Australia, little is known about the risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from prior room occupants. The aims of the study are to understand the risk of MRSA acquisition from prior room occupants and to further extend the existing knowledge-base on the role of discharge cleaning in hospitals.
Methods
A non-concurrent cohort study was undertaken in five wards at a 250-bed general hospital in Tasmania, Australia. All admitted patients were screened for MRSA. Weekly screenings for all patients who remained in hospital were undertaken. New MRSA acquisitions were identified. The exposed group were patients whose immediate prior room occupant had MRSA, while the unexposed prior room occupant did not have MRSA.
Results
6228 patients were at risk of acquiring MRSA, with 237 new MRSA acquisitions equating to an acquisition rate of 3.8% for each at-risk patient admission. The unadjusted odds ratio for acquiring MRSA when the prior room occupant had MRSA was 2.9 (95% CI 2.2–3.9). Using logistic regression, exposure to a prior occupant harbouring MRSA remained a significant predictor of subsequent acquisition, after controlling for variables, OR 2.7 (95% CI 2.0–3.6).
Conclusion
Admission to a room previously occupied by a person with MRSA increased the odds of acquisition forthe subsequentpatient, independent of other risk factors. It demonstrates the necessity of having effective discharge cleaning practices in place. We believe increased attention to discharge room cleaning in hospitals is required and the reconsideration of additional recommendations for discharge cleaning.
在澳大利亚,人们对从以前的房间居住者那里获得耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的风险知之甚少。本研究的目的是了解从以前的房间居住者获得MRSA的风险,并进一步扩展关于医院出院清洁作用的现有知识库。方法对澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚一家拥有250个床位的综合医院的5个病房进行非同期队列研究。所有入院的病人都接受了MRSA筛查。每周对所有留在医院的病人进行检查。发现了新的MRSA感染。暴露组是患者的前一个房间的人有MRSA,而未暴露的前一个房间的人没有MRSA。结果6228例患者存在MRSA感染风险,其中237例新的MRSA感染,相当于每个有MRSA感染风险的患者获得率为3.8%。当先前的房间居住者患有MRSA时,获得MRSA的未调整优势比为2.9 (95% CI 2.2-3.9)。使用逻辑回归,在控制变量后,暴露于先前携带MRSA的居住者仍然是后续感染的重要预测因子,OR为2.7 (95% CI 2.0-3.6)。结论:与其他危险因素无关,入住MRSA患者曾住过的房间会增加后续患者感染MRSA的几率。它表明有必要采取有效的排放清洁措施。我们认为,需要加强对医院出院室清洁的关注,并重新考虑出院清洁的其他建议。