Sporicidal activity of tea tree oil

Syndie Messager BSc PhD, Katherine A Hammer BSc PhD, Christine F Carson BSc (Hons) PhD, Thomas V Riley PhD FRCPath
{"title":"Sporicidal activity of tea tree oil","authors":"Syndie Messager BSc PhD,&nbsp;Katherine A Hammer BSc PhD,&nbsp;Christine F Carson BSc (Hons) PhD,&nbsp;Thomas V Riley PhD FRCPath","doi":"10.1071/HI06112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to the lack of antiseptics with sporicidal properties, the activity of tea tree oil (TTO)-containing products was investigated according to the EN 14347 European suspension method. The activity of different concentrations of TTO in 0.001% Tween 80, as well as an alcoholic hygienic skin wash (AHSW) and an alcoholic handrub (AHR), was compared to the sporicidal disinfectants sodium hypochlorite (SH) and hydrogen peroxide (HP), and the antiseptic povidone iodine (PVI). These formulations were assessed after 30, 60 and 120 minutes against two strains of spore-forming bacteria: <em>Bacillus</em> cereus and <em>Bacillus subtilis</em>.</p><p>The TTO formulated products and PVI did not achieve &gt;4 log<sub>10</sub> reduction in spore counts, thus did not meet the European standard requirements. Nevertheless, 5%, 10% and 15% TTO in 0.001% Tween 80 significantly reduced the concentration of bacterial spores when compared with the water control, and were generally more effective than PVI. At a concentration of 15%, TTO was more active than 0.05% SH against spores of both strains after 30 minutes’ contact time, while 5% TTO in Tween 80 was generally more active than the AHSW that also contained 5% TTO.</p><p>These findings emphasise the fact that it is necessary to assess final formulations rather than the active component by itself as excipients may interfere with the activity. The alcohol-containing AHSW and AHR did not demonstrate any sporicidal properties, confirming previous studies showing that alcohol is not sporicidal and suggesting no synergy between TTO and alcohol against spores. Hence these should not be used for hand hygiene or surface decontamination if spores are involved. Further studies should be carried out to investigate the potential sporicidal activity of TTO directly on human skin <em>in vivo</em> with volunteers andlor by using an ’<em>ex vivo</em>’ test that uses freshly excised human skin and which would allow testing of any biocide as well as any spore-forming bacterial strain, including pathogens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92877,"journal":{"name":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 112, 114, 116-118, 120-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI06112","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1329936016300359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Due to the lack of antiseptics with sporicidal properties, the activity of tea tree oil (TTO)-containing products was investigated according to the EN 14347 European suspension method. The activity of different concentrations of TTO in 0.001% Tween 80, as well as an alcoholic hygienic skin wash (AHSW) and an alcoholic handrub (AHR), was compared to the sporicidal disinfectants sodium hypochlorite (SH) and hydrogen peroxide (HP), and the antiseptic povidone iodine (PVI). These formulations were assessed after 30, 60 and 120 minutes against two strains of spore-forming bacteria: Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis.

The TTO formulated products and PVI did not achieve >4 log10 reduction in spore counts, thus did not meet the European standard requirements. Nevertheless, 5%, 10% and 15% TTO in 0.001% Tween 80 significantly reduced the concentration of bacterial spores when compared with the water control, and were generally more effective than PVI. At a concentration of 15%, TTO was more active than 0.05% SH against spores of both strains after 30 minutes’ contact time, while 5% TTO in Tween 80 was generally more active than the AHSW that also contained 5% TTO.

These findings emphasise the fact that it is necessary to assess final formulations rather than the active component by itself as excipients may interfere with the activity. The alcohol-containing AHSW and AHR did not demonstrate any sporicidal properties, confirming previous studies showing that alcohol is not sporicidal and suggesting no synergy between TTO and alcohol against spores. Hence these should not be used for hand hygiene or surface decontamination if spores are involved. Further studies should be carried out to investigate the potential sporicidal activity of TTO directly on human skin in vivo with volunteers andlor by using an ’ex vivo’ test that uses freshly excised human skin and which would allow testing of any biocide as well as any spore-forming bacterial strain, including pathogens.

茶树油的杀孢活性
由于缺乏具有杀孢性能的防腐剂,根据EN 14347欧洲悬液法对含茶树油(TTO)产品的活性进行了研究。研究了0.001% Tween 80中不同浓度TTO、酒精卫生洗面奶(AHSW)和酒精洗手液(AHR)与杀菌消毒剂次氯酸钠(SH)、双氧水(HP)和杀菌剂聚维酮碘(PVI)的活性。这些配方在30,60和120分钟后对两种芽孢形成细菌:蜡样芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌进行了评估。TTO配方产品和PVI未实现孢子数减少4 log10,因此不符合欧洲标准要求。然而,0.001% Tween 80中5%、10%和15% TTO与对照相比,显著降低了细菌孢子的浓度,总体上比PVI更有效。在15%的浓度下,对两种菌株孢子的活性均高于0.05% SH,而在Tween 80中,5%的TTO总体上比同样含有5% TTO的AHSW更有活性。这些发现强调了这样一个事实,即有必要评估最终配方而不是活性成分本身,因为赋形剂可能会干扰活性。含酒精的AHSW和AHR没有表现出任何杀孢特性,证实了先前的研究表明酒精没有杀孢作用,并表明TTO和酒精对孢子没有协同作用。因此,如果涉及孢子,这些不应用于手部卫生或表面消毒。应该开展进一步的研究,以调查TTO在体内直接作用于人体皮肤上的潜在杀孢活性,并通过使用新鲜切除的人体皮肤进行“离体”试验,该试验将允许测试任何杀菌剂以及任何形成孢子的细菌菌株,包括病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信