Janine Calver PhD (Dr), Barbara Horner PhD (Associate Professor), Duncan Boldy PhD (Professor), Max Bulsara MSc
{"title":"The burden of infectious diseases in Western Australian residential aged care facilities: a population-based record linkage study","authors":"Janine Calver PhD (Dr), Barbara Horner PhD (Associate Professor), Duncan Boldy PhD (Professor), Max Bulsara MSc","doi":"10.1071/HI06079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite infections being a major cause of morbidity and mortality in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), population-based epidemiological literature is currently lacking. The aims of this study were therefore to provide a baseline for infection surveillance in Australian RACFs, to examine the association between resident characteristics and infections and to calculate the inpatient cost implications of infections. A retrospective, population-based cohort was identified from Western Australian (WA) residential aged care claims data in 2001 (14,075 permanent care residents) linked with resident appraisals, hospital discharge and mortality records for 2 years.</p><p>Almost one quarter (23.3%) of residents hospitalised in the 2 years of follow-up were hospitalised due to infection. The overall rate of infection was 0.29 per 1,000 resident days. Compared with residents assessed as low-care, high-care residents were at reduced risk of respiratory tract (RTIs) (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), urinary tract (UTIs) (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76) or skin infections (OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76), but at increased risk of septicaemia (OR=1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.14). Residents hospitalised for infection used 18,731 bed days and had inpatient costs of A$12.1m.</p><p>Infection is a common reason for patient transfers from RACFs to hospital. Workforce profile is the most likely explanation for the increased risk of infections (excluding septicaemia) in residents assessed as low-care. Efforts to reduce hospital transfers from Australian RACFs should focus on developing Australian practice guidelines and improving the availability of skilled clinical staff to support practice in low-care facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92877,"journal":{"name":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 79-80, 82, 84, 86, 88-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI06079","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian infection control : official journal of the Australian Infection Control Association Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1329936016300414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Despite infections being a major cause of morbidity and mortality in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), population-based epidemiological literature is currently lacking. The aims of this study were therefore to provide a baseline for infection surveillance in Australian RACFs, to examine the association between resident characteristics and infections and to calculate the inpatient cost implications of infections. A retrospective, population-based cohort was identified from Western Australian (WA) residential aged care claims data in 2001 (14,075 permanent care residents) linked with resident appraisals, hospital discharge and mortality records for 2 years.
Almost one quarter (23.3%) of residents hospitalised in the 2 years of follow-up were hospitalised due to infection. The overall rate of infection was 0.29 per 1,000 resident days. Compared with residents assessed as low-care, high-care residents were at reduced risk of respiratory tract (RTIs) (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), urinary tract (UTIs) (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76) or skin infections (OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76), but at increased risk of septicaemia (OR=1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.14). Residents hospitalised for infection used 18,731 bed days and had inpatient costs of A$12.1m.
Infection is a common reason for patient transfers from RACFs to hospital. Workforce profile is the most likely explanation for the increased risk of infections (excluding septicaemia) in residents assessed as low-care. Efforts to reduce hospital transfers from Australian RACFs should focus on developing Australian practice guidelines and improving the availability of skilled clinical staff to support practice in low-care facilities.
尽管感染是住宅老年护理设施(racf)发病和死亡的主要原因,但目前缺乏基于人群的流行病学文献。因此,本研究的目的是为澳大利亚racf的感染监测提供基线,检查居民特征与感染之间的关系,并计算感染的住院成本影响。从2001年西澳大利亚(WA)住宅老年护理索赔数据(14,075名永久护理居民)中确定了一个回顾性的、基于人群的队列,该队列与居民评估、出院和2年的死亡率记录有关。近四分之一(23.3%)的住院居民在2年随访期间因感染住院。总体感染率为每1000个居住日0.29例。与评估为低护理的居民相比,高护理的居民呼吸道(RTIs) (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99)、尿路(UTIs) (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76)或皮肤感染(OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.76)的风险降低,但败血症的风险增加(OR=1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.14)。因感染住院的居民使用了18731个住院日,住院费用为1210万澳元。感染是患者从rac转到医院的常见原因。劳动力状况是评估为低护理的居民感染风险增加(不包括败血症)的最可能解释。减少澳大利亚地区综合医院转院的努力应侧重于制定澳大利亚的实践准则,并改善熟练临床工作人员的供应,以支持低护理设施的实践。