{"title":"Methodus als Lebensweg bei Johann Conrad Dannhauer. Existentialisierung der Dialektik in der Lutherischen Orthodoxie","authors":"C. Weidemann","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2021.1988430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"an implicit use of the concept of semantic truth in ancient China (ch.6), which is different from Hansen’s view. The approach of Yiu-ming Fung and others is sometimes criticized as ‘(mis)interpreting Chinese texts in a Western framework’. In recent years, there has been a strong call to use informal logic or generalized argumentation in the research of the history of Chinese logic, but in the eyes of more conservative researchers, this still may not count as ‘interpreting Chinese texts in an intrinsic Chinese framework’. Did logic exist in ancient China? Is mingbian consistent with Western logic or is it a separate type of logic? Should the Mohist logic be seen primarily as a branch of logic, rhetoric, or pragmatics? These are the most fundamental questions in the field of the history of Chinese logic, which concerns the legitimacy of the discipline of ‘ancient Chinese logic’. The collection would have been more relevant to the theme of the philosophy of logic if it were supplemented by a discussion from this perspective.","PeriodicalId":55053,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of Logic","volume":"43 1","pages":"198 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2021.1988430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
an implicit use of the concept of semantic truth in ancient China (ch.6), which is different from Hansen’s view. The approach of Yiu-ming Fung and others is sometimes criticized as ‘(mis)interpreting Chinese texts in a Western framework’. In recent years, there has been a strong call to use informal logic or generalized argumentation in the research of the history of Chinese logic, but in the eyes of more conservative researchers, this still may not count as ‘interpreting Chinese texts in an intrinsic Chinese framework’. Did logic exist in ancient China? Is mingbian consistent with Western logic or is it a separate type of logic? Should the Mohist logic be seen primarily as a branch of logic, rhetoric, or pragmatics? These are the most fundamental questions in the field of the history of Chinese logic, which concerns the legitimacy of the discipline of ‘ancient Chinese logic’. The collection would have been more relevant to the theme of the philosophy of logic if it were supplemented by a discussion from this perspective.
期刊介绍:
History and Philosophy of Logic contains articles, notes and book reviews dealing with the history and philosophy of logic. ’Logic’ is understood to be any volume of knowledge which was regarded as logic at the time in question. ’History’ refers back to ancient times and also to work in this century; however, the Editor will not accept articles, including review articles, on very recent work on a topic. ’Philosophy’ refers to broad and general questions: specialist articles which are now classed as ’philosophical logic’ will not be published.
The Editor will consider articles on the relationship between logic and other branches of knowledge, but the component of logic must be substantial. Topics with no temporal specification are to be interpreted both historically and philosophically. Each topic includes its own metalogic where appropriate.