Methodus als Lebensweg bei Johann Conrad Dannhauer. Existentialisierung der Dialektik in der Lutherischen Orthodoxie

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
C. Weidemann
{"title":"Methodus als Lebensweg bei Johann Conrad Dannhauer. Existentialisierung der Dialektik in der Lutherischen Orthodoxie","authors":"C. Weidemann","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2021.1988430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"an implicit use of the concept of semantic truth in ancient China (ch.6), which is different from Hansen’s view. The approach of Yiu-ming Fung and others is sometimes criticized as ‘(mis)interpreting Chinese texts in a Western framework’. In recent years, there has been a strong call to use informal logic or generalized argumentation in the research of the history of Chinese logic, but in the eyes of more conservative researchers, this still may not count as ‘interpreting Chinese texts in an intrinsic Chinese framework’. Did logic exist in ancient China? Is mingbian consistent with Western logic or is it a separate type of logic? Should the Mohist logic be seen primarily as a branch of logic, rhetoric, or pragmatics? These are the most fundamental questions in the field of the history of Chinese logic, which concerns the legitimacy of the discipline of ‘ancient Chinese logic’. The collection would have been more relevant to the theme of the philosophy of logic if it were supplemented by a discussion from this perspective.","PeriodicalId":55053,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of Logic","volume":"43 1","pages":"198 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2021.1988430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

an implicit use of the concept of semantic truth in ancient China (ch.6), which is different from Hansen’s view. The approach of Yiu-ming Fung and others is sometimes criticized as ‘(mis)interpreting Chinese texts in a Western framework’. In recent years, there has been a strong call to use informal logic or generalized argumentation in the research of the history of Chinese logic, but in the eyes of more conservative researchers, this still may not count as ‘interpreting Chinese texts in an intrinsic Chinese framework’. Did logic exist in ancient China? Is mingbian consistent with Western logic or is it a separate type of logic? Should the Mohist logic be seen primarily as a branch of logic, rhetoric, or pragmatics? These are the most fundamental questions in the field of the history of Chinese logic, which concerns the legitimacy of the discipline of ‘ancient Chinese logic’. The collection would have been more relevant to the theme of the philosophy of logic if it were supplemented by a discussion from this perspective.
离开这里时你看到的就是约翰康拉德·丹尼路德派辩证法的存在
中国古代对语义真概念的含蓄使用(第六章),这与汉森的观点不同。冯耀明和其他人的方法有时被批评为“(错误地)在西方框架中解释中国文本”。近年来,在中国逻辑史研究中出现了使用非正式逻辑或广义论证的强烈呼声,但在较为保守的研究者看来,这可能仍不能算作“用内在的中国框架来解读中国文本”。逻辑在古代中国存在吗?mingbian与西方逻辑是一致的,还是一种独立的逻辑?墨家的逻辑应该主要被视为逻辑、修辞学或语用学的一个分支吗?这些都是中国逻辑史领域最基本的问题,关系到“中国古代逻辑”学科的合法性。如果从这一角度进行讨论,文集将更切合逻辑哲学的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of Logic
History and Philosophy of Logic 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of Logic contains articles, notes and book reviews dealing with the history and philosophy of logic. ’Logic’ is understood to be any volume of knowledge which was regarded as logic at the time in question. ’History’ refers back to ancient times and also to work in this century; however, the Editor will not accept articles, including review articles, on very recent work on a topic. ’Philosophy’ refers to broad and general questions: specialist articles which are now classed as ’philosophical logic’ will not be published. The Editor will consider articles on the relationship between logic and other branches of knowledge, but the component of logic must be substantial. Topics with no temporal specification are to be interpreted both historically and philosophically. Each topic includes its own metalogic where appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信