Localisation of function for noun and verb reading: Converging evidence for shared processing from fMRI activation and reaction time

R. Borowsky, C. Esopenko, Layla A. Gould, N. Kuhlmann, G. Sarty, J. Cummine
{"title":"Localisation of function for noun and verb reading: Converging evidence for shared processing from fMRI activation and reaction time","authors":"R. Borowsky, C. Esopenko, Layla A. Gould, N. Kuhlmann, G. Sarty, J. Cummine","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.665466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some researchers have argued in favour of verbs primarily activating the left frontal operculum (FO) in the dorsal stream, and left middle temporal (MT) region in the ventral stream, and that nouns primarily activate the left inferior temporal (IT) region in the ventral stream. Others have suggested that the activation representing noun and verb processing involves a shared neural network. We explored these hypotheses through the naming of identical, homonymous, separately cued nouns (the bat) and verbs (to bat) presented in word format using a modified naming task that ensured participants were treating the target as the appropriate part of speech (POS). Using homonymous homographs for both the noun and verb referents provides for an optimally controlled comparison given the target stimuli and responses are physically identical. Experiment 1 was a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment that showed that the majority of activation was shared by both the noun and verb naming conditions, across both the ventral and dorsal streams, including the regions suggested by previous researchers as unique to verbs (FO, MT) or nouns (IT). In contrast, there was little unique activation attributable to noun processing, and practically no unique activation attributable to verb processing. This experiment, which supports a spatially shared ventral and dorsal network for noun and verb naming, was the impetus for new hypotheses involving the sharing of processes in time. Experiment 2 showed an overadditive interaction on naming reaction time (RT) between POS and bigram frequency, which provided converging evidence that the shared processing for nouns and verbs involves sublexical processing, whereas an overadditive interaction between POS and word frequency provided converging evidence that the shared processing also involves orthographic lexical access. As such, our study provides converging fMRI and RT evidence that noun and verb reading predominantly share processing along both the ventral-lexical and dorsal-sublexical reading streams.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.665466","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and cognitive processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.665466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Some researchers have argued in favour of verbs primarily activating the left frontal operculum (FO) in the dorsal stream, and left middle temporal (MT) region in the ventral stream, and that nouns primarily activate the left inferior temporal (IT) region in the ventral stream. Others have suggested that the activation representing noun and verb processing involves a shared neural network. We explored these hypotheses through the naming of identical, homonymous, separately cued nouns (the bat) and verbs (to bat) presented in word format using a modified naming task that ensured participants were treating the target as the appropriate part of speech (POS). Using homonymous homographs for both the noun and verb referents provides for an optimally controlled comparison given the target stimuli and responses are physically identical. Experiment 1 was a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment that showed that the majority of activation was shared by both the noun and verb naming conditions, across both the ventral and dorsal streams, including the regions suggested by previous researchers as unique to verbs (FO, MT) or nouns (IT). In contrast, there was little unique activation attributable to noun processing, and practically no unique activation attributable to verb processing. This experiment, which supports a spatially shared ventral and dorsal network for noun and verb naming, was the impetus for new hypotheses involving the sharing of processes in time. Experiment 2 showed an overadditive interaction on naming reaction time (RT) between POS and bigram frequency, which provided converging evidence that the shared processing for nouns and verbs involves sublexical processing, whereas an overadditive interaction between POS and word frequency provided converging evidence that the shared processing also involves orthographic lexical access. As such, our study provides converging fMRI and RT evidence that noun and verb reading predominantly share processing along both the ventral-lexical and dorsal-sublexical reading streams.
名词和动词阅读功能的定位:fMRI激活和反应时间对共享处理的聚合证据
一些研究者认为动词主要激活位于背流的左侧额盖区(FO)和位于腹侧流的左侧颞中区(MT),而名词主要激活位于腹侧流的左侧颞下区(IT)。其他人则认为,代表名词和动词处理的激活涉及一个共享的神经网络。我们通过命名相同的、同音的、单独提示的名词(bat)和动词(to bat)来探索这些假设,使用一个修改的命名任务,以word格式呈现,确保参与者将目标视为适当的词性(POS)。使用同音异义词的名词和动词的指称提供了一个最佳的控制比较给定的目标刺激和反应是物理上相同的。实验1是功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)实验,该实验表明,大多数激活是由名词和动词命名条件共享的,横跨腹侧和背侧流,包括先前研究人员提出的动词(FO, MT)或名词(IT)特有的区域。相比之下,名词加工的独特激活很少,动词加工的独特激活几乎没有。这个实验支持了名词和动词命名在空间上共享的腹侧和背侧网络,是涉及时间共享过程的新假设的推动力。实验2显示词频与双字词频对命名反应时间(RT)的超加性交互作用,为名词和动词的共享加工涉及亚词汇加工提供了收敛证据;词频与词频之间的超加性交互作用也为共享加工涉及正字法词汇获取提供了收敛证据。因此,我们的研究提供了fMRI和RT的证据,表明名词和动词阅读主要是在腹侧词汇流和背侧亚词汇流上共享处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信