ABSTRACT

Melih Kirlidog
{"title":"ABSTRACT","authors":"Melih Kirlidog","doi":"10.1080/01405110310001633128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consent and confidentiality Informed consent: patients listen and read, but what information do they retain? [comment] Turner P, Williams C. New Zealand Medical Journal 2002; 115(1164): U218. AIM: To determine the percentage of knowledge retained immediately following an outpatient consultation for total hip and knee joint arthroplasty, and whether any improvement in that knowledge occurred after reading an information leaflet about the operation. METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for joint replacement surgery were given verbal information during the consultation about basic operative details, post-operative programme, and potential complications. A questionnaire was completed asking them to recall these details. They were then given information leaflets to read. Six weeks later, they were contacted again and asked the same questions. RESULTS: Immediately following a consultation, patients recall only a small percentage of information. In particular, retention of post-operative recovery time frames, and possible operative complications is poor. Despite an information booklet, patients’ level of knowledge deteriorates from the initial consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Verbal and written information supplied to a patient may be understood, but it is easily and quickly forgotten. In an increasingly medicolegal environment, it is essential to gain informed consent from a patient when performing interventions. The provision of an information booklet may provide nothing more than proof for the surgeon of information provision to the patient. (Authors’ abstract) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348(8): 721–6. BACKGROUND: Institutional review boards (IRBs) are charged with safeguarding potential research subjects with limited literacy but may have an inadvertent role in promulgating unreadable consent forms. We hypothesized that text provided by IRBs in informed-consent forms falls short of the IRBs’ own readability standards and that readability is influenced by the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight. METHODS: To test these hypotheses, we conducted a cross-sectional study linking data from several public-use sources. A total of 114 Web sites of US medical schools were surveyed for IRB readability standards and informed-consent-form templates. Actual readability was measured with the Flesch–Kincaid scale, which assigns a score on the basis of the minimal grade level required to read and understand English text (range, 0–12). Data on the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight were obtained from organizational Web sites. RESULTS: The average readability score for text provided by IRBs was 10.6 (95% confidence interval, 10.3–10.8) on the Flesch–Kincaid scale. Specific readability standards, found on 61 Web sites (54%), ranged from a fifth-grade reading level to a 10th-grade reading level. The mean Flesch–Kincaid scores for the readability of sample text provided by IRBs exceeded the stated standard by 2.8 grade levels (95% confidence interval, 2.4–3.2;Pv0.001). Readability was not associated with either the level of research funding (P~0.89) or local rates of literacy (P~0.92). However, the 52 schools that had beenmade subject to oversight by the Office for Human Research Protections (46%) had lower Flesch– Kincaid scores than the other schools (10.2 vs. 10.9, P~0.005). CONCLUSIONS: IRBs commonly provide text for informed-consent forms that falls short of their own readability standards. Federal oversight is associated with better readability. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. (Authors’ abstract) The requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 for the processing of medical data Boyd P. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29(1): 34–5. The Data Protection Act 1998 presents a number of significant challenges to data controllers in the health sector. To assist data controllers in understanding their obligations under the act, the Information Commissioner has published guidance, The Use and Disclosure of Health Data, which is reproduced here. The guidance deals, among other things, with the steps that must be taken to obtain patient data fairly, the implied requirements of the act to use anonymised or psuedonymised data where possible, an exemption applicable principally to records based research, the right of patients to object to the processing of their data, and the interface of the act and the common law duty of confidence. (Author’s abstract) Some limits of informed consent O’Neill O. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29(1): 4–7. Many accounts of informed consent in medical ethics claim that it is valuable because it supports individual autonomy. Unfortunately there are many distinct conceptions of individual autonomy, and their ethical importance Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 182–186 ISSN 0140-511X printed/ISSN 1465-3494 online/03/040182-05 # 2003 Institute of Medical Illustrators DOI: 10.1080/01405110310001633128 varies. A better reason for taking informed consent seriously is that it provides assurance that patients and others are neither deceived nor coerced. Present debates about the relative importance of generic and specific consent (particularly in the use of human tissues for research and in secondary studies) do not address this issue squarely. Consent is a propositional attitude, so intransitive: complete, wholly specific consent is an illusion. Since the point of consent procedures is to limit deception and coercion, they should be designed to give patients and others control over the amount of information they receive and opportunity to rescind consent already given. (Author’s abstract) Security of medical multimedia Tzelepi S, Pangalos G, Nikolacopoulou G. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine 2003; 27(3): 169–84. The application of information technology to health care has generated growing concern about the privacy and security of medical information. Furthermore, data and communication security requirements in the field of multimedia are higher. In this paper we describe firstly the most important security requirements that must be fulfilled by multimedia medical data, and the security measures used to satisfy these requirements. These security measures are based mainly on modern cryptographic and watermarking mechanisms as well as on security infrastructures. The objective of our work is to complete this picture, exploiting the capabilities of multimedia medical data to define and implement an authorization model for regulating access to the data. In this paper we describe an extended rolebased access control model by considering, within the specification of the role–permission relationship phase, the constraints that must be satisfied in order for the holders of the permission to use those permissions. The use of constraints allows role-based access control to be tailored to specifiy very fine-grained and flexible content-, contextand time-based access control policies. Other restrictions, such as role entry restriction also can be captured. Finally, the description of system architecture for a secure DBMS is presented. (Authors’ abstract) Legal and ethical issues in the use of anonymous images in pathology teaching and research [Review] Tranberg HA, Rous BA, Rashbass J. Histopathology 2003; 42(2): 104–9. The privacy of patients’ health information is of paramount importance. However, it is equally important that medical staff and students have access to photographs and video recordings of real patients for training purposes. Where the patient can be identified from such images, his or her consent is clearly required to both obtain the image and to use it in this way. However, the need for consent, both legally and ethically, is much less convincing where the patient cannot, by the very nature of the image, be identified from it. This is the case for many images used in the teaching of clinical medicine, such as videos taken of laparoscopies, images of internal organs and unlabelled X-rays. [References: 28] (Authors’ abstract) Forensic photography Background correction in forensic photography (I). Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color – theoretical aspects and proof of concept Wagner JH, Miskelly GM. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2003; 48(3): 593–603. The combination of photographs taken at two or three wavelengths at and bracketing an absorbance peak indicative of a particular compound can lead to an image with enhanced visualization of the compound. This procedure works best for compounds with absorbance bands that are narrow compared with ‘average’ chromophores. If necessary, the photographs can be taken with different exposure times to ensure that sufficient light from the substrate is detected at all three wavelengths. The combination of images is readily performed if the images are obtained with a digital camera and are then processed using an image processing program. Best results are obtained if linear images at the peak maximum, at a slightly shorter wavelength, and at a slightly longer wavelength are used. However, acceptable results can also be obtained under many conditions if non-linear photographs are used or if only two wavelengths (one of which is at the peak maximum) are combined. These latter conditions are more achievable by many ‘mid-range’ digital cameras. Wavelength selection can either be by controlling the illumination (e.g., by using an alternate light source) or by use of narrow bandpass filters. The technique is illustrated using blood as the target analyte, using bands of light centered at 395, 415, and 435 nm. The extension of the method to detection of blood by fluorescence quenching is also ","PeriodicalId":76645,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"181 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01405110310001633128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01405110310001633128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consent and confidentiality Informed consent: patients listen and read, but what information do they retain? [comment] Turner P, Williams C. New Zealand Medical Journal 2002; 115(1164): U218. AIM: To determine the percentage of knowledge retained immediately following an outpatient consultation for total hip and knee joint arthroplasty, and whether any improvement in that knowledge occurred after reading an information leaflet about the operation. METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for joint replacement surgery were given verbal information during the consultation about basic operative details, post-operative programme, and potential complications. A questionnaire was completed asking them to recall these details. They were then given information leaflets to read. Six weeks later, they were contacted again and asked the same questions. RESULTS: Immediately following a consultation, patients recall only a small percentage of information. In particular, retention of post-operative recovery time frames, and possible operative complications is poor. Despite an information booklet, patients’ level of knowledge deteriorates from the initial consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Verbal and written information supplied to a patient may be understood, but it is easily and quickly forgotten. In an increasingly medicolegal environment, it is essential to gain informed consent from a patient when performing interventions. The provision of an information booklet may provide nothing more than proof for the surgeon of information provision to the patient. (Authors’ abstract) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348(8): 721–6. BACKGROUND: Institutional review boards (IRBs) are charged with safeguarding potential research subjects with limited literacy but may have an inadvertent role in promulgating unreadable consent forms. We hypothesized that text provided by IRBs in informed-consent forms falls short of the IRBs’ own readability standards and that readability is influenced by the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight. METHODS: To test these hypotheses, we conducted a cross-sectional study linking data from several public-use sources. A total of 114 Web sites of US medical schools were surveyed for IRB readability standards and informed-consent-form templates. Actual readability was measured with the Flesch–Kincaid scale, which assigns a score on the basis of the minimal grade level required to read and understand English text (range, 0–12). Data on the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight were obtained from organizational Web sites. RESULTS: The average readability score for text provided by IRBs was 10.6 (95% confidence interval, 10.3–10.8) on the Flesch–Kincaid scale. Specific readability standards, found on 61 Web sites (54%), ranged from a fifth-grade reading level to a 10th-grade reading level. The mean Flesch–Kincaid scores for the readability of sample text provided by IRBs exceeded the stated standard by 2.8 grade levels (95% confidence interval, 2.4–3.2;Pv0.001). Readability was not associated with either the level of research funding (P~0.89) or local rates of literacy (P~0.92). However, the 52 schools that had beenmade subject to oversight by the Office for Human Research Protections (46%) had lower Flesch– Kincaid scores than the other schools (10.2 vs. 10.9, P~0.005). CONCLUSIONS: IRBs commonly provide text for informed-consent forms that falls short of their own readability standards. Federal oversight is associated with better readability. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. (Authors’ abstract) The requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 for the processing of medical data Boyd P. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29(1): 34–5. The Data Protection Act 1998 presents a number of significant challenges to data controllers in the health sector. To assist data controllers in understanding their obligations under the act, the Information Commissioner has published guidance, The Use and Disclosure of Health Data, which is reproduced here. The guidance deals, among other things, with the steps that must be taken to obtain patient data fairly, the implied requirements of the act to use anonymised or psuedonymised data where possible, an exemption applicable principally to records based research, the right of patients to object to the processing of their data, and the interface of the act and the common law duty of confidence. (Author’s abstract) Some limits of informed consent O’Neill O. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29(1): 4–7. Many accounts of informed consent in medical ethics claim that it is valuable because it supports individual autonomy. Unfortunately there are many distinct conceptions of individual autonomy, and their ethical importance Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 182–186 ISSN 0140-511X printed/ISSN 1465-3494 online/03/040182-05 # 2003 Institute of Medical Illustrators DOI: 10.1080/01405110310001633128 varies. A better reason for taking informed consent seriously is that it provides assurance that patients and others are neither deceived nor coerced. Present debates about the relative importance of generic and specific consent (particularly in the use of human tissues for research and in secondary studies) do not address this issue squarely. Consent is a propositional attitude, so intransitive: complete, wholly specific consent is an illusion. Since the point of consent procedures is to limit deception and coercion, they should be designed to give patients and others control over the amount of information they receive and opportunity to rescind consent already given. (Author’s abstract) Security of medical multimedia Tzelepi S, Pangalos G, Nikolacopoulou G. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine 2003; 27(3): 169–84. The application of information technology to health care has generated growing concern about the privacy and security of medical information. Furthermore, data and communication security requirements in the field of multimedia are higher. In this paper we describe firstly the most important security requirements that must be fulfilled by multimedia medical data, and the security measures used to satisfy these requirements. These security measures are based mainly on modern cryptographic and watermarking mechanisms as well as on security infrastructures. The objective of our work is to complete this picture, exploiting the capabilities of multimedia medical data to define and implement an authorization model for regulating access to the data. In this paper we describe an extended rolebased access control model by considering, within the specification of the role–permission relationship phase, the constraints that must be satisfied in order for the holders of the permission to use those permissions. The use of constraints allows role-based access control to be tailored to specifiy very fine-grained and flexible content-, contextand time-based access control policies. Other restrictions, such as role entry restriction also can be captured. Finally, the description of system architecture for a secure DBMS is presented. (Authors’ abstract) Legal and ethical issues in the use of anonymous images in pathology teaching and research [Review] Tranberg HA, Rous BA, Rashbass J. Histopathology 2003; 42(2): 104–9. The privacy of patients’ health information is of paramount importance. However, it is equally important that medical staff and students have access to photographs and video recordings of real patients for training purposes. Where the patient can be identified from such images, his or her consent is clearly required to both obtain the image and to use it in this way. However, the need for consent, both legally and ethically, is much less convincing where the patient cannot, by the very nature of the image, be identified from it. This is the case for many images used in the teaching of clinical medicine, such as videos taken of laparoscopies, images of internal organs and unlabelled X-rays. [References: 28] (Authors’ abstract) Forensic photography Background correction in forensic photography (I). Photography of blood under conditions of non-uniform illumination or variable substrate color – theoretical aspects and proof of concept Wagner JH, Miskelly GM. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2003; 48(3): 593–603. The combination of photographs taken at two or three wavelengths at and bracketing an absorbance peak indicative of a particular compound can lead to an image with enhanced visualization of the compound. This procedure works best for compounds with absorbance bands that are narrow compared with ‘average’ chromophores. If necessary, the photographs can be taken with different exposure times to ensure that sufficient light from the substrate is detected at all three wavelengths. The combination of images is readily performed if the images are obtained with a digital camera and are then processed using an image processing program. Best results are obtained if linear images at the peak maximum, at a slightly shorter wavelength, and at a slightly longer wavelength are used. However, acceptable results can also be obtained under many conditions if non-linear photographs are used or if only two wavelengths (one of which is at the peak maximum) are combined. These latter conditions are more achievable by many ‘mid-range’ digital cameras. Wavelength selection can either be by controlling the illumination (e.g., by using an alternate light source) or by use of narrow bandpass filters. The technique is illustrated using blood as the target analyte, using bands of light centered at 395, 415, and 435 nm. The extension of the method to detection of blood by fluorescence quenching is also
摘要
知情同意:患者倾听和阅读,但他们保留了哪些信息?[评论]Turner P, Williams C.《新西兰医学杂志》,2002;115 (1164): U218。目的:确定在全髋关节和膝关节置换术的门诊会诊后立即保留的知识的百分比,以及在阅读有关手术的信息单张后是否有任何知识的改善。方法:等待关节置换手术的患者在会诊时口头告知基本手术细节、术后计划和潜在并发症。他们完成了一份调查问卷,要求他们回忆这些细节。然后发给他们传单让他们阅读。六周后,再次联系他们,问同样的问题。结果:在咨询后,患者只记得很小比例的信息。特别是,保留术后恢复时间框架,以及可能的手术并发症较差。尽管有一本信息小册子,但患者的知识水平从最初的咨询开始恶化。结论:提供给患者的口头和书面信息可能被理解,但容易且很快被遗忘。在日益法律化的环境中,在实施干预措施时获得患者的知情同意至关重要。信息手册的提供可能只是为外科医生提供给患者信息的证明。(作者摘要)知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性的比较。知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性的比较。Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL.新英格兰医学杂志2003;348(8): 721 - 6。背景:机构审查委员会(irb)负责保护文化水平有限的潜在研究受试者,但可能在颁布不可读的同意书方面起到无意的作用。我们假设irb在知情同意书中提供的文本没有达到irb自己的可读性标准,并且可读性受到研究活动水平、当地识字率和联邦监督的影响。方法:为了验证这些假设,我们进行了一项横断面研究,将来自几个公共使用来源的数据联系起来。共有114家美国医学院网站接受了IRB可读性标准和知情同意书模板的调查。实际可读性采用Flesch-Kincaid量表进行测量,该量表根据阅读和理解英语文本所需的最低年级水平(范围0-12)进行评分。有关研究活动水平、地方识字率和联邦监督的数据都是从各组织网站上获得的。结果:IRBs提供的文本在Flesch-Kincaid量表上的平均可读性得分为10.6(95%置信区间为10.3-10.8)。在61个网站(54%)上发现了具体的可读性标准,从五年级的阅读水平到十年级的阅读水平不等。IRBs提供的样本文本可读性的Flesch-Kincaid平均分超过规定标准2.8个等级水平(95%置信区间,2.4-3.2;Pv0.001)。可读性与研究经费水平(P~0.89)或当地识字率(P~0.92)无关。然而,受人类研究保护办公室监管的52所学校(46%)的Flesch - Kincaid分数低于其他学校(10.2比10.9,P~0.005)。结论:irb通常为知情同意书提供的文本不符合他们自己的可读性标准。联邦监管与更好的可读性有关。版权所有2003马萨诸塞州医学协会。(作者摘要)1998年《数据保护法》对医疗数据处理的要求Boyd P. Journal of medical Ethics 2003;(1): 29日34-5。《1998年数据保护法》对卫生部门的数据控制者提出了若干重大挑战。为了帮助数据控制者了解他们在该法案下的义务,信息专员发布了指南《健康数据的使用和披露》,转载在这里。除其他事项外,该指南涉及为公平获取患者数据而必须采取的步骤,该法案在可能的情况下使用匿名或假名数据的隐含要求,主要适用于基于记录的研究的豁免,患者反对处理其数据的权利,以及该法案与普通法保密义务的接口。(作者摘要)知情同意的若干限制O 'Neill O. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29(1): 4 - 7。医学伦理中关于知情同意的许多说法声称,知情同意之所以有价值,是因为它支持个人自主。 不幸的是,有许多不同的个人自治概念,以及他们的道德重要性医学视听媒体杂志,Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 182-186 ISSN 0140-511X印刷/ISSN 1465-3494在线/03/040182-05 # 2003医学插画家研究所DOI: 10.1080/01405110310001633128各不相同。认真对待知情同意的一个更好的理由是,它可以保证患者和其他人既不会被欺骗也不会被强迫。目前关于通用同意和特定同意的相对重要性的争论(特别是在使用人体组织进行研究和二次研究时)并没有直接解决这个问题。同意是一种命题态度,所以是不及物的:完全的、完全具体的同意是一种幻觉。既然同意程序的目的是限制欺骗和胁迫,那么这些程序的设计应使患者和其他人能够控制他们收到的信息的数量,并有机会取消已经给予的同意。(作者摘要)医学多媒体的安全性Tzelepi S, Pangalos G, Nikolacopoulou G.医学信息学与医学互联网2003;27(3): 169 - 84。信息技术在医疗保健中的应用引起了人们对医疗信息隐私和安全的日益关注。此外,多媒体领域对数据和通信的安全要求也更高。本文首先介绍了多媒体医疗数据必须满足的最重要的安全要求,以及为满足这些要求所采取的安全措施。这些安全措施主要基于现代加密和水印机制以及安全基础设施。我们的工作目标是完成这一图景,利用多媒体医疗数据的功能来定义和实现用于规范对数据访问的授权模型。在本文中,我们描述了一个扩展的基于角色的访问控制模型,在角色-权限关系阶段的规范中,考虑了为了使权限的持有者使用这些权限而必须满足的约束。约束的使用允许对基于角色的访问控制进行定制,以指定非常细粒度和灵活的基于内容、上下文和时间的访问控制策略。其他限制,例如角色输入限制也可以被捕获。最后,给出了安全数据库管理系统的体系结构描述。(作者摘要)病理学教学和研究中使用匿名图像的法律和伦理问题[综述]Tranberg HA, Rous BA, Rashbass J.组织病理学2003;42(2): 104 - 9。患者健康信息的隐私至关重要。然而,同样重要的是,医务人员和学生能够获得真实病人的照片和录像,以便进行培训。如果可以从这样的图像中识别出患者,则明确需要他或她同意获取图像并以这种方式使用它。然而,无论从法律上还是从道德上来说,征得患者同意的必要性都不那么令人信服,因为由于图像的本质,患者无法从图像中识别出来。这是临床医学教学中使用的许多图像的情况,例如腹腔镜的视频,内部器官的图像和未标记的x射线。[参考文献:28](作者摘要)法医摄影中的背景校正(一).光照不均匀或基材颜色变化条件下的血液摄影——理论方面和概念证明Wagner JH, Miskelly GM. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2003;48(3): 593 - 603。在指示特定化合物的吸光度峰处以两个或三个波长所拍摄的照片的组合并包围该吸光度峰可导致具有增强的该化合物的可视化的图像。这种方法对吸收带比“平均”发色团窄的化合物效果最好。如果有必要,可以用不同的曝光时间拍摄照片,以确保在所有三个波长的基片上都能检测到足够的光。如果用数码相机获得图像,然后使用图像处理程序进行处理,则容易地执行图像的组合。如果使用峰值、波长稍短和波长稍长的线性图像,则可获得最佳结果。然而,在许多情况下,如果使用非线性照片或仅结合两个波长(其中一个处于峰值最大值),也可以获得可接受的结果。后一种条件对于许多“中档”数码相机来说更容易实现。波长选择可以通过控制照明(例如,通过使用替代光源)或使用窄带通滤波器来实现。 该技术以血液为目标分析物,使用以395,415和435 nm为中心的光带进行说明。并将该方法推广到荧光猝灭法检测血液
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信