Diagrammatic reasoning: Abstraction, interaction, and insight

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
K. Tylén, Riccardo Fusaroli, Johanne S. Bjørndahl, J. Rączaszek-Leonardi, S. Østergaard, F. Stjernfelt
{"title":"Diagrammatic reasoning: Abstraction, interaction, and insight","authors":"K. Tylén, Riccardo Fusaroli, Johanne S. Bjørndahl, J. Rączaszek-Leonardi, S. Østergaard, F. Stjernfelt","doi":"10.1075/PC.22.2.06TYL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to find our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. The active involvement and manipulation of representational artifacts for purposes of thinking and communicating is discussed in relation to C.S. Peirce’s notion of diagrammatical reasoning. We propose to extend Peirce’s original ideas and sketch a conceptual framework that delineates different kinds of diagram manipulation: Sometimes diagrams are manipulated in order to profile known information in an optimal fashion. At other times diagrams are explored in order to gain new insights, solve problems or discover hidden meaning potentials. The latter cases often entail manipulations that either generate additional information or extract information by means of abstraction. Ideas are substantiated by reference to ethnographic, experimental and historical examples.","PeriodicalId":45741,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics & Cognition","volume":"22 1","pages":"264-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/PC.22.2.06TYL","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/PC.22.2.06TYL","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to find our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. The active involvement and manipulation of representational artifacts for purposes of thinking and communicating is discussed in relation to C.S. Peirce’s notion of diagrammatical reasoning. We propose to extend Peirce’s original ideas and sketch a conceptual framework that delineates different kinds of diagram manipulation: Sometimes diagrams are manipulated in order to profile known information in an optimal fashion. At other times diagrams are explored in order to gain new insights, solve problems or discover hidden meaning potentials. The latter cases often entail manipulations that either generate additional information or extract information by means of abstraction. Ideas are substantiated by reference to ethnographic, experimental and historical examples.
图解推理:抽象、交互和洞察
许多类型的日常和专业推理都依赖于图表:我们用地图来找到我们的路,我们画图表和草图来交流概念和证明几何定理,我们操纵图表来探索新的创造性的问题解决方案。本文结合C.S.皮尔斯的图解推理概念,讨论了为了思维和交流的目的而主动参与和操纵表征人工制品的问题。我们建议扩展Peirce的原始思想,并勾勒出一个描述不同类型的图表操作的概念框架:有时,为了以最佳方式描述已知信息,图表被操纵。在其他时候,探索图表是为了获得新的见解,解决问题或发现隐藏的意义潜力。后一种情况通常需要产生额外信息或通过抽象方式提取信息的操作。思想通过参考民族志、实验和历史实例得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信