Editor's Introduction

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
M. Harkin
{"title":"Editor's Introduction","authors":"M. Harkin","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2015.1029837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bruce Kaufman has provided a novel and thought-provoking analysis of the evolution of the field of industrial relations. In addition to analyzing the development of the academic field of industrial relations during the twentieth century in the United States, he assesses the state of the major professional association of the field, the Industrial Relations Research Association, and offers prescriptions for the revival of each. The three reviewers whose comments follow all take issue with some of Kaufman's arguments, but all praise him for presenting a well-written, carefully reasoned thesis. I share their high opinion of the book's quality. The special attention we give the book in this review symposium, however, might not be warranted if it were not also the case that the subject Kaufman explores is of unquestionable interest and practical importance to industrial relations scholars and practitioners. Few would deny that the field of industrial relations and the practice of collective bargaining in the United States are in crisis-or, at least, at a crossroads. At the simplest level, the shrinking number of","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"44 1","pages":"69 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2015.1029837","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2015.1029837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bruce Kaufman has provided a novel and thought-provoking analysis of the evolution of the field of industrial relations. In addition to analyzing the development of the academic field of industrial relations during the twentieth century in the United States, he assesses the state of the major professional association of the field, the Industrial Relations Research Association, and offers prescriptions for the revival of each. The three reviewers whose comments follow all take issue with some of Kaufman's arguments, but all praise him for presenting a well-written, carefully reasoned thesis. I share their high opinion of the book's quality. The special attention we give the book in this review symposium, however, might not be warranted if it were not also the case that the subject Kaufman explores is of unquestionable interest and practical importance to industrial relations scholars and practitioners. Few would deny that the field of industrial relations and the practice of collective bargaining in the United States are in crisis-or, at least, at a crossroads. At the simplest level, the shrinking number of
编辑器的介绍
布鲁斯·考夫曼对劳资关系领域的演变进行了新颖而发人深省的分析。除了分析20世纪美国劳资关系学术领域的发展之外,他还评估了该领域的主要专业协会——劳资关系研究协会的状况,并为每个协会的复兴提供了处方。随后发表评论的三位评论家都对考夫曼的一些论点提出了质疑,但都称赞他提出了一篇写得很好、推理缜密的论文。我同意他们对这本书质量的高度评价。然而,如果不是考夫曼探索的主题对劳资关系学者和实践者具有毫无疑问的兴趣和实际重要性,我们在这次评论研讨会上给予这本书的特别关注可能就没有必要了。很少有人会否认,美国的劳资关系领域和集体谈判实践正处于危机之中,或者至少处于十字路口。在最简单的层面上,不断减少的数量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Anthropology
Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信