Hearing impairment among adults - extent of the problem and scientific evidence on the outcome of hearing aid rehabilitation

E. Mäki-Torkko, B. Brorsson, A. Davis, I. Mair, K. I. Myhre, A. Parving, R. Roine, U. Rosenhall, M. Sorri, S. Stilvén
{"title":"Hearing impairment among adults - extent of the problem and scientific evidence on the outcome of hearing aid rehabilitation","authors":"E. Mäki-Torkko, B. Brorsson, A. Davis, I. Mair, K. I. Myhre, A. Parving, R. Roine, U. Rosenhall, M. Sorri, S. Stilvén","doi":"10.1080/010503901750409385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific surveys on current and estimated prevalence of hearing impairment (HI) in adult populations (≥18 years of age) in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and scientific reports on the outcome of hearing aid (HA) rehabilitation worldwide were reviewed. Only a few of the studies meet strict scientific criteria, and many locally clinically relevant studies cannot be generalized to larger populations. Population-based studies indicate an increase in prevalence of HI with age, but because of differences in study populations and available national population statistics, the studies do not allow reliable comparisons between countries or estimation of future prevalence of HI. Studies on HA prescription or outcomes do not provide uniform data in favour of non-linear amplification, but they do show some subject preference for the newer technology. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the degree of HI and the effects of amplification. The literature review alone gives only limited information regarding the extent of the problem of HI in adult populations in the target countries. Similarly, only a few studies on HA outcome meet strict scientific criteria and even fewer studies correlate rehabilitation outcome with the degree of HI, disability or handicap.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"15 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901750409385","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901750409385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Scientific surveys on current and estimated prevalence of hearing impairment (HI) in adult populations (≥18 years of age) in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and scientific reports on the outcome of hearing aid (HA) rehabilitation worldwide were reviewed. Only a few of the studies meet strict scientific criteria, and many locally clinically relevant studies cannot be generalized to larger populations. Population-based studies indicate an increase in prevalence of HI with age, but because of differences in study populations and available national population statistics, the studies do not allow reliable comparisons between countries or estimation of future prevalence of HI. Studies on HA prescription or outcomes do not provide uniform data in favour of non-linear amplification, but they do show some subject preference for the newer technology. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the degree of HI and the effects of amplification. The literature review alone gives only limited information regarding the extent of the problem of HI in adult populations in the target countries. Similarly, only a few studies on HA outcome meet strict scientific criteria and even fewer studies correlate rehabilitation outcome with the degree of HI, disability or handicap.
成人听力障碍——问题的程度和助听器康复效果的科学证据
本文回顾了丹麦、芬兰、挪威、瑞典和英国成年人(≥18岁)中听力障碍(HI)的现状和估计患病率的科学调查,以及世界范围内助听器(HA)康复结果的科学报告。只有少数研究符合严格的科学标准,许多局部临床相关研究无法推广到更大的人群。基于人群的研究表明,HI患病率随着年龄的增长而增加,但由于研究人群和现有国家人口统计数据的差异,这些研究不允许在国家之间进行可靠的比较或估计HI的未来患病率。关于HA处方或结果的研究并没有提供支持非线性放大的统一数据,但它们确实显示了一些受试者对新技术的偏好。关于HI的程度和扩增的影响,没有得出结论。文献综述本身仅提供了有限的信息,说明了目标国家成人人群中HI问题的严重程度。同样,只有少数关于HA结果的研究符合严格的科学标准,更少的研究将康复结果与HI、残疾或残疾的程度联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信