The latency of evoked otoacoustic emissions: Its relation to hearing loss and auditory evoked potentials

S. Hoth, Frank Nikolas Weber
{"title":"The latency of evoked otoacoustic emissions: Its relation to hearing loss and auditory evoked potentials","authors":"S. Hoth, Frank Nikolas Weber","doi":"10.1080/010503901316914548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latencies of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have been studied in 173 patients with cochlear hearing impairment. No systematic or significant correlation between the OAE latency and the hearing loss at the corresponding frequency could be found, whereas the ABR latencies increase by a small but significant amount with increasing hearing loss. This can be explained by a broadening of the excited area and its shifting towards a more apical position if the hair cell population in the basal turn is depleted. Because of the considerable intersubject variability of OAE latencies the data do not allow to decide whether they are not influenced by cochlear hearing loss or whether an effect is merely not observable. The large variability is attributed to the interindividual differences of OAE generation time and return delay whereas the travel time of the primary wave is less variable as can be seen from the low variability of ABR latencies.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"173 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901316914548","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901316914548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The latencies of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have been studied in 173 patients with cochlear hearing impairment. No systematic or significant correlation between the OAE latency and the hearing loss at the corresponding frequency could be found, whereas the ABR latencies increase by a small but significant amount with increasing hearing loss. This can be explained by a broadening of the excited area and its shifting towards a more apical position if the hair cell population in the basal turn is depleted. Because of the considerable intersubject variability of OAE latencies the data do not allow to decide whether they are not influenced by cochlear hearing loss or whether an effect is merely not observable. The large variability is attributed to the interindividual differences of OAE generation time and return delay whereas the travel time of the primary wave is less variable as can be seen from the low variability of ABR latencies.
诱发耳声发射潜伏期:与听力损失和听觉诱发电位的关系
本文研究了173例耳蜗听力障碍患者瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)和听性脑干反应(ABR)的潜伏期。OAE潜伏期与相应频率的听力损失之间没有系统或显著的相关性,而ABR潜伏期随着听力损失的增加而增加,但幅度不大,但幅度显著。这可以解释为,如果毛细胞群在基部转向耗尽,则兴奋区扩大并向更顶端的位置移动。由于OAE潜伏期在受试者间存在相当大的可变性,因此数据无法确定它们是否不受耳蜗听力损失的影响,或者是否只是无法观察到这种影响。大的变异性是由于声发射产生时间和回波延迟的个体间差异,而一次波的传播时间变化较小,这可以从ABR延迟的低变异性中看出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信