Speech processing strategy preferences among 55 European CLARION cochlear implant users

Scandinavian audiology Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI:10.1080/010503901300007001

L. Stollwerck, Karen Goodrum-Clarke, C. Lynch, G. Armstrong-Bednall, T. Nunn, Lori Markoff, L. Mens, C. Mcanallen, Jianing Wei, P. Boyle, C. George, Y. Zilberman

{"title":"Speech processing strategy preferences among 55 European CLARION cochlear implant users","authors":"L. Stollwerck, Karen Goodrum-Clarke, C. Lynch, G. Armstrong-Bednall, T. Nunn, Lori Markoff, L. Mens, C. Mcanallen, Jianing Wei, P. Boyle, C. George, Y. Zilberman","doi":"10.1080/010503901300007001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multicentre study investigates the preference and performance of a group of 55 adult CLARION cochlear implant users with the choice of simultaneous analogue stimulation (SAS) and continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) strategies during the first 3 months of implant use. Subjects were programmed with both strategies and instructed to use each of the two strategies in daily life to ascertain preference. Subjects were tested in both strategies with open-set sentence materials, auditory alone, at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the initial programming session. Questionnaires were completed with preference ratings being recorded for the two strategies: 25% of subjects preferred SAS and 75% CIS. Subjects performed better in their strategy of choice. Preferences were set very early on in the process and did not change. Factors influencing preference are discussed. Offering the choice of fundamentally different strategies improves both individual and group performance.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"36 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901300007001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901300007001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Abstract

This multicentre study investigates the preference and performance of a group of 55 adult CLARION cochlear implant users with the choice of simultaneous analogue stimulation (SAS) and continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) strategies during the first 3 months of implant use. Subjects were programmed with both strategies and instructed to use each of the two strategies in daily life to ascertain preference. Subjects were tested in both strategies with open-set sentence materials, auditory alone, at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the initial programming session. Questionnaires were completed with preference ratings being recorded for the two strategies: 25% of subjects preferred SAS and 75% CIS. Subjects performed better in their strategy of choice. Preferences were set very early on in the process and did not change. Factors influencing preference are discussed. Offering the choice of fundamentally different strategies improves both individual and group performance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

55名欧洲CLARION人工耳蜗使用者的语音处理策略偏好

这项多中心研究调查了55名成年CLARION人工耳蜗使用者在使用人工耳蜗的前3个月选择同步模拟刺激(SAS)和连续交错采样(CIS)策略的偏好和表现。研究人员给受试者设定了这两种策略，并指示他们在日常生活中使用这两种策略中的每一种来确定偏好。在最初的编程课程后的第2周、第6周和第12周，研究对象分别使用开放的句子材料和单独的听觉来测试这两种策略。问卷调查完成后，记录了两种策略的偏好等级:25%的受试者选择SAS, 75%的受试者选择CIS。受试者在选择策略上表现得更好。首选项是在过程的早期设置的，并且不会改变。讨论了影响偏好的因素。提供根本不同的策略选择，可以提高个人和团队的绩效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Scandinavian audiology

自引率

0.00%

发文量