Similarity Between Subject and Stimulus as an Influence on Projection

E. Weisskopf-Joelson, Jay Zimmerman, Max H. McDaniel
{"title":"Similarity Between Subject and Stimulus as an Influence on Projection","authors":"E. Weisskopf-Joelson, Jay Zimmerman, Max H. McDaniel","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary It was hypothesized that there would be a difference in the amount of projection elicited by figures viewed by Ss as highly similar and highly dissimilar to themselves. Ss rated 20 figures of the MAPS test and the concept “Myself” on 15 scales of the Semantic Differential. Ss then were asked to describe six figures, three which they had rated as highly similar and three as highly dissimilar to themselves. For each S the mean Transcendence Index of the three highly similar and highly dissimilar figures were computed. No significant differences were found between the amount of projection elicited by the different sets of figures. The results are in agreement with previous studies on the effect of similarity on projection.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 1","pages":"328-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380257","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary It was hypothesized that there would be a difference in the amount of projection elicited by figures viewed by Ss as highly similar and highly dissimilar to themselves. Ss rated 20 figures of the MAPS test and the concept “Myself” on 15 scales of the Semantic Differential. Ss then were asked to describe six figures, three which they had rated as highly similar and three as highly dissimilar to themselves. For each S the mean Transcendence Index of the three highly similar and highly dissimilar figures were computed. No significant differences were found between the amount of projection elicited by the different sets of figures. The results are in agreement with previous studies on the effect of similarity on projection.
被试与刺激之间的相似性对投射的影响
据推测,被s认为与自己高度相似和高度不同的人物所引起的投射量会有所不同。学生对MAPS测验的20个图和“我自己”概念在语义差异的15个量表上进行评分。然后,学生们被要求描述六个数字,其中三个与自己非常相似,另外三个与自己非常不同。对于每个S,计算三个高度相似和高度不相似图形的平均超越指数。不同组的数字所引起的投影量之间没有显著差异。这一结果与先前关于相似性对投射的影响的研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信