Construct Validity of the FIRO-B Questionnaire: A Failure to Replicate?

T. C. Froehle
{"title":"Construct Validity of the FIRO-B Questionnaire: A Failure to Replicate?","authors":"T. C. Froehle","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The purpose of this investigation was to partially replicate and elaborate upon a validation study of the FIRO-B Questionnaire reported by Kramer. (1967a) The 25 Ss employed in this study were administered the FIRO-B Questionnaire, given a brief lecture on the theory behind the instrument and then directed to estimate their scores on the three FIRO-B dimensions. Rank order correlations were calculated between the measured and estimated scores. Contrary to Kramer's findings only one of the six resulting coefficients attained significance at or beyond the .05 level of confidence. A recent finding in the estimated and measured test score approach to test validation studies, namely scale relevance to individual Ss, was proposed as a possible explanation for the inconsistent results. A partial replication of the Kramer (1967a) test validation study of the FIRO-B Questionnaire yielded a significant relationship between estimated and measured scores on one of the six scales of the instrument, namely, exp...","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 1","pages":"146-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380224","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Summary The purpose of this investigation was to partially replicate and elaborate upon a validation study of the FIRO-B Questionnaire reported by Kramer. (1967a) The 25 Ss employed in this study were administered the FIRO-B Questionnaire, given a brief lecture on the theory behind the instrument and then directed to estimate their scores on the three FIRO-B dimensions. Rank order correlations were calculated between the measured and estimated scores. Contrary to Kramer's findings only one of the six resulting coefficients attained significance at or beyond the .05 level of confidence. A recent finding in the estimated and measured test score approach to test validation studies, namely scale relevance to individual Ss, was proposed as a possible explanation for the inconsistent results. A partial replication of the Kramer (1967a) test validation study of the FIRO-B Questionnaire yielded a significant relationship between estimated and measured scores on one of the six scales of the instrument, namely, exp...
FIRO-B问卷结构效度:复制失败?
本研究的目的是部分复制和阐述Kramer报告的FIRO-B问卷的验证研究。(1967a)本研究中使用的25名学生接受了FIRO-B问卷调查,对仪器背后的理论进行了简短的讲解,然后指导他们估计FIRO-B三个维度的分数。在测量得分和估计得分之间计算秩序相关性。与Kramer的发现相反,六个结果系数中只有一个达到或超过0.05水平的显著性。最近在测试验证研究的估计和测量测试分数方法中发现,即量表与个体Ss的相关性,被提出作为不一致结果的可能解释。部分复制Kramer (1967a)对FIRO-B问卷的检验验证研究得出了仪器六个量表之一的估计分数和测量分数之间的显著关系,即exp…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信