Idealism and realism: Conan Doyle, imperialism and the Anglo-Boer War

Kleio Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00232080385310031
E. Bradlow
{"title":"Idealism and realism: Conan Doyle, imperialism and the Anglo-Boer War","authors":"E. Bradlow","doi":"10.1080/00232080385310031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's responses to his experiences during the AngloBoer War typify the dilemma of any idealist when confronted with the practical implementation of his beliefs. The creator of the quintessential logician, Sherlock Holmes, encountered during that conflict ambiguities inherent in the profession of a heroic destiny for the British Empire that had never previously been encountered. His reaction can best be described as an example of cognitive dissonance; denial of flaws in the ideology coupled with acknowledgement of its agents' imperfections. This article therefore focuses on these two aspects of Doyle's South African experiences, manifested in his roles as a doctor and subsequently as a historian of the conflict. Antagonistic attitudes to Kruger's government in the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek (popularly known as the Transvaal) began to emerge in both Britain and South Africa soon after the Jameson Raid. The South African League, whose support extended throughout the two Br i t i shco lon ies and the Uitlander community of the Transvaal, envisaged the ultimate absorption of the republic as a component of the Empire. The league's British equivalent was the Imperial South African Association, whose members included imperialist stalwarts like Kipling and Rider Haggard. Founded ostensibly to propagandise the 'imperial viewpoint' by means primarily of meetings and pamphlets, its fundamental purpose was to 'uphold British supremacy and to promote the interests of British subjects in South Africa'. When Alfred Milner ('a British race patriot' , in his own words) became High Commissioner in South Africa in May 1897, the league willingly endorsed his increasingly antagonistic attitude towards the Transvaal. The counterweight to this organisation, informally launched in Britain in November 1899 after the outbreak of war, was the South African Conciliation Committee, a non-party group led by the Liberal Unionist Member of Parliament (MP) Leonard Courtney, Rhodesian","PeriodicalId":81767,"journal":{"name":"Kleio","volume":"35 1","pages":"19 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00232080385310031","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kleio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00232080385310031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's responses to his experiences during the AngloBoer War typify the dilemma of any idealist when confronted with the practical implementation of his beliefs. The creator of the quintessential logician, Sherlock Holmes, encountered during that conflict ambiguities inherent in the profession of a heroic destiny for the British Empire that had never previously been encountered. His reaction can best be described as an example of cognitive dissonance; denial of flaws in the ideology coupled with acknowledgement of its agents' imperfections. This article therefore focuses on these two aspects of Doyle's South African experiences, manifested in his roles as a doctor and subsequently as a historian of the conflict. Antagonistic attitudes to Kruger's government in the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek (popularly known as the Transvaal) began to emerge in both Britain and South Africa soon after the Jameson Raid. The South African League, whose support extended throughout the two Br i t i shco lon ies and the Uitlander community of the Transvaal, envisaged the ultimate absorption of the republic as a component of the Empire. The league's British equivalent was the Imperial South African Association, whose members included imperialist stalwarts like Kipling and Rider Haggard. Founded ostensibly to propagandise the 'imperial viewpoint' by means primarily of meetings and pamphlets, its fundamental purpose was to 'uphold British supremacy and to promote the interests of British subjects in South Africa'. When Alfred Milner ('a British race patriot' , in his own words) became High Commissioner in South Africa in May 1897, the league willingly endorsed his increasingly antagonistic attitude towards the Transvaal. The counterweight to this organisation, informally launched in Britain in November 1899 after the outbreak of war, was the South African Conciliation Committee, a non-party group led by the Liberal Unionist Member of Parliament (MP) Leonard Courtney, Rhodesian
理想主义与现实主义:柯南·道尔、帝国主义与英布战争
阿瑟·柯南·道尔爵士对他在英布战争期间的经历的回应,典型地反映了任何理想主义者在面对其信念的实际实施时所面临的困境。典型逻辑学家夏洛克·福尔摩斯的创造者在这场冲突中遇到了大英帝国英雄命运职业固有的模糊性,这是以前从未遇到过的。他的反应最好被描述为认知失调的一个例子;否认意识形态的缺陷,同时承认其代理人的缺陷。因此,本文主要关注道尔在南非经历的这两个方面,这体现在他作为医生和后来作为冲突历史学家的角色上。在詹姆逊袭击事件发生后不久,英国和南非开始出现对克鲁格政府在南非南部南非荷兰共和国(通常被称为德兰士瓦省)的敌对态度。南非联盟的支持延伸到整个布兰特和德兰士瓦的两个地区,它设想共和国最终被吸收为帝国的一个组成部分。该联盟在英国的同类组织是南非帝国协会,其成员包括吉卜林和莱德·哈格德等帝国主义坚定分子。它的成立表面上主要是通过会议和小册子来宣传“帝国观点”,其根本目的是“维护英国的霸权,促进英国在南非的臣民的利益”。1897年5月,当阿尔弗雷德·米尔纳(Alfred Milner,用他自己的话说,“一个英国种族爱国者”)成为南非高级专员时,联盟自愿支持他对德兰士瓦的日益敌对的态度。1899年11月,战争爆发后,在英国非正式成立了南非和解委员会(South African reconciliation Committee)。该委员会是由罗德西亚的自由统一党议员伦纳德·考特尼(Leonard Courtney)领导的一个非党派组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信