{"title":"The Place and Time of the Political in Urban Political Ecology: Contested Imaginations of a River's Future","authors":"R. Holifield, N. Schuelke","doi":"10.1080/00045608.2014.988102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban political ecology (UPE) has become an important and influential paradigm for the geographic analysis of socioecological transformation. Despite considerable progress in its empirical and theoretical sophistication, however, what it means to analyze the specifically political dimensions of change in UPE accounts remains largely unspecified and underdeveloped. One option receiving attention is to confine analysis of the “properly political” to the disruption of prevailing orders by egalitarian challenges. As an alternative, we propose and elaborate a pragmatist approach to political analysis that has emerged in science and technology studies. Through accounts of two efforts to imagine the socioecological future of an urban river, we aim to demonstrate the potential of such an approach. We argue that in addition to local variation and the deployment of knowledge, analyses of the political trajectories of issues should address historical variation and the mobilization of desire. We contend that such an approach provides a methodology for tracing connections between conventional political processes and extraordinary moments of disruption and that it is also compatible with multiple perspectives on the “political” within UPE.","PeriodicalId":80485,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","volume":"105 1","pages":"294 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00045608.2014.988102","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.988102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
Abstract
Urban political ecology (UPE) has become an important and influential paradigm for the geographic analysis of socioecological transformation. Despite considerable progress in its empirical and theoretical sophistication, however, what it means to analyze the specifically political dimensions of change in UPE accounts remains largely unspecified and underdeveloped. One option receiving attention is to confine analysis of the “properly political” to the disruption of prevailing orders by egalitarian challenges. As an alternative, we propose and elaborate a pragmatist approach to political analysis that has emerged in science and technology studies. Through accounts of two efforts to imagine the socioecological future of an urban river, we aim to demonstrate the potential of such an approach. We argue that in addition to local variation and the deployment of knowledge, analyses of the political trajectories of issues should address historical variation and the mobilization of desire. We contend that such an approach provides a methodology for tracing connections between conventional political processes and extraordinary moments of disruption and that it is also compatible with multiple perspectives on the “political” within UPE.
城市政治生态学(Urban political ecology, UPE)已成为社会生态转型地理学分析的一个重要而有影响力的范式。然而,尽管在经验和理论的复杂性方面取得了相当大的进展,但分析UPE帐户变化的具体政治层面的意义在很大程度上仍未明确和不发达。受到关注的一种选择是,将对“适当政治”的分析局限于平等主义挑战对现行秩序的破坏。作为一种替代方案,我们提出并阐述了一种实用主义的政治分析方法,这种方法已经出现在科学和技术研究中。通过两种设想城市河流社会生态未来的努力,我们的目标是展示这种方法的潜力。我们认为,除了地方差异和知识的部署,问题的政治轨迹的分析应该解决历史差异和欲望的动员。我们认为,这种方法提供了一种方法,用于追踪传统政治进程与中断的特殊时刻之间的联系,并且它也与UPE内部“政治”的多种观点兼容。