Conceptualizing the therapeutic relationship: Mediator or moderator of change?

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ellora Vilkin, T. Sullivan, M. Goldfried
{"title":"Conceptualizing the therapeutic relationship: Mediator or moderator of change?","authors":"Ellora Vilkin, T. Sullivan, M. Goldfried","doi":"10.1037/int0000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the therapy relationship has long been recognized as an essential factor in the change process, there has been disagreement concerning whether the relationship is itself curative or rather supports the bene fi ts of speci fi c therapeutic techniques. To advance and clarify this conversation, this article conceptualizes the therapy relationship as both a mediator and/or moderator of change that can be used strategically in accord with case formulation for treatment goals. We begin with a brief overview of the relevant literature on the therapy relationship versus technique and the role of the therapy relationship as mediator or moderator across theoretical orientations. We then suggest an integrative framework by which clinicians and psychotherapy researchers may conceptualize the therapeutic relationship based on case conceptualization, where the requirements in each case and not theoretical orientation should determine the therapist ’ s use of the therapy relationship. Finally, we discuss implications for psychotherapy research and practice. Public Health Significance Statement This article discusses the role of the therapist – client relationship in promoting positive treatment outcomes. We review debates about the importance of the therapy relationship versus speci fi c therapeutic techniques and describe how different types of psychotherapy frame the relationship. We argue that it is essential for psychotherapy practitioners and researchers to develop a fl exible view of how to use the therapeutic relationship with regard to speci fi c clinical problems and relevant evidence-based techniques.","PeriodicalId":46982,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although the therapy relationship has long been recognized as an essential factor in the change process, there has been disagreement concerning whether the relationship is itself curative or rather supports the bene fi ts of speci fi c therapeutic techniques. To advance and clarify this conversation, this article conceptualizes the therapy relationship as both a mediator and/or moderator of change that can be used strategically in accord with case formulation for treatment goals. We begin with a brief overview of the relevant literature on the therapy relationship versus technique and the role of the therapy relationship as mediator or moderator across theoretical orientations. We then suggest an integrative framework by which clinicians and psychotherapy researchers may conceptualize the therapeutic relationship based on case conceptualization, where the requirements in each case and not theoretical orientation should determine the therapist ’ s use of the therapy relationship. Finally, we discuss implications for psychotherapy research and practice. Public Health Significance Statement This article discusses the role of the therapist – client relationship in promoting positive treatment outcomes. We review debates about the importance of the therapy relationship versus speci fi c therapeutic techniques and describe how different types of psychotherapy frame the relationship. We argue that it is essential for psychotherapy practitioners and researchers to develop a fl exible view of how to use the therapeutic relationship with regard to speci fi c clinical problems and relevant evidence-based techniques.
概念化治疗关系:改变的中介还是调节?
虽然治疗关系长期以来一直被认为是改变过程中的一个重要因素,但对于这种关系本身是否具有治疗性,还是支持特定治疗技术的益处,一直存在分歧。为了推进和澄清这一对话,本文将治疗关系概念化为变化的中介和/或调节因子,可以根据治疗目标的病例表述有策略地使用。我们首先简要概述了有关治疗关系与技术的相关文献,以及治疗关系在理论取向中的中介或调节作用。然后,我们提出了一个综合框架,通过这个框架,临床医生和心理治疗研究人员可以根据病例概念化来概念化治疗关系,其中每个病例的需求而不是理论取向应该决定治疗师对治疗关系的使用。最后,我们讨论了对心理治疗研究和实践的影响。公共卫生意义声明这篇文章讨论了治疗师-来访者关系在促进积极治疗结果中的作用。我们回顾了关于治疗关系与特定治疗技术的重要性的争论,并描述了不同类型的心理治疗如何构建这种关系。我们认为,对于心理治疗从业者和研究人员来说,有必要发展一种灵活的观点,即如何在特定的临床问题和相关的循证技术方面使用治疗关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychotherapy Integration offers original peer-reviewed papers that move beyond the confines of single-school or single-theory approaches to psychotherapy and behavior change. The journal publishes articles that significantly advance the knowledge of psychotherapy integration and present new data, theory, or clinical techniques relevant to psychotherapy integration. Coverage includes articles integrating the knowledge of psychotherapy and behavior change with developments in the broader fields of psychology and psychiatry (e.g., cognitive sciences, psychobiology, health psychology, and social psychology). (formerly published by Kluwer Academic/Plenum)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信