Increasing Students' Attendance at Lecture and Preparation for Lecture by Allowing Students to Use Their Notes during Tests

Paul A. Messling, M. Dermer
{"title":"Increasing Students' Attendance at Lecture and Preparation for Lecture by Allowing Students to Use Their Notes during Tests","authors":"Paul A. Messling, M. Dermer","doi":"10.1037/H0100678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many college students appear uninterested in learning. For example, a survey of sociology majors at a mid-sized public university found 73% agreeing that they would take a course where they earned an A but learned little or nothing and 53% agreeing that the instructor was responsible for keeping students attentive in class (Delucchi & Korgen, 2002). Material of direct interest to students, however, cannot always be taught. This is often true in introductory courses in the sciences where students must learn basic principles and concepts. Indeed, the importance of learning may only become evident after students have completed courses. On a day-to-day basis then, instructors may find themselves teaching material of little interest to students. So, substantial numbers of students may never or rarely complete reading assignments on schedule (e.g., Conner-Greene, 2000; Slish, 2005; Vandehey, Marsh, & Diekhoff, 2005) and many may skip lecture (Vandehey et al., 2005). In the near future these academic behaviors may worsen as more students hold outside jobs. Of students attending college for four years, about 75% report working while attending college, with about 25% working full time, presumably to cover ever-increasing tuition costs (Choy, 2002). Given decreasing public support for higher education, the deleterious effects remunerated work may have on academic behavior, and other contingencies that support student consumerism--how can we enhance preparing for and attending lecture? One approach to increasing the number of students who prepare for lecture is by reinforcing preparation. For example, Carkenord (1994) wanted his students to come to class prepared to discuss assigned journal articles. So, he awarded students course credit for bringing a brief summary and critique of the articles to class and submitting these notes at the class's end. Most importantly, beyond offering course credit, Carkenord also returned these notes so students could use them during tests. He reported that students typically submitted notes for about 74% of the articles. Carkenord neither experimentally evaluated his instructed contingency nor explored whether offering course credit was necessary to support his students reading assigned materials and completing notes before class. It is possible that such desirable academic behavior could have been supported by allowing students to later use their notes during tests. That such use may function as a reinforcer is an implication of the Response Deprivation Hypothesis (Timberlake & Farmer-Dougan, 1991) which suggests that constraining behavior below baseline levels renders that behavior reinforcing. Constraint appears present in most test situations when notes are prohibited. But what suggests that without the prohibition students would bring notes to tests? First, when people must respond in new ways they often use prompts. For example, an instructor is likely to use note cards, overhead transparencies, or PowerPoint[R] slides when presenting new material. Similarly, students may be disposed to use notes when answering test questions on new material. The best evidence for this is students illicitly constructing and using \"cheat sheets\" during tests. Thus, we reasoned that sanctioning note use during tests could reinforce desirable academic behavior. More specifically, we designed a two-component treatment package which included instructions about an \"attendance/submission contingency\" and the contingency: only if students attended lecture and submitted hand-written notes for each day's reading assignment could they use their notes during a later test. We experimentally evaluated this \"instructed contingency\" in a course where the percentage of students attending lecture typically was only about 70% and, worse yet, only about 30% of the students attending reported having read the day's reading assignment. In this course, weekly tests were based primarily on material presented in the course's text. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"10 1","pages":"381-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many college students appear uninterested in learning. For example, a survey of sociology majors at a mid-sized public university found 73% agreeing that they would take a course where they earned an A but learned little or nothing and 53% agreeing that the instructor was responsible for keeping students attentive in class (Delucchi & Korgen, 2002). Material of direct interest to students, however, cannot always be taught. This is often true in introductory courses in the sciences where students must learn basic principles and concepts. Indeed, the importance of learning may only become evident after students have completed courses. On a day-to-day basis then, instructors may find themselves teaching material of little interest to students. So, substantial numbers of students may never or rarely complete reading assignments on schedule (e.g., Conner-Greene, 2000; Slish, 2005; Vandehey, Marsh, & Diekhoff, 2005) and many may skip lecture (Vandehey et al., 2005). In the near future these academic behaviors may worsen as more students hold outside jobs. Of students attending college for four years, about 75% report working while attending college, with about 25% working full time, presumably to cover ever-increasing tuition costs (Choy, 2002). Given decreasing public support for higher education, the deleterious effects remunerated work may have on academic behavior, and other contingencies that support student consumerism--how can we enhance preparing for and attending lecture? One approach to increasing the number of students who prepare for lecture is by reinforcing preparation. For example, Carkenord (1994) wanted his students to come to class prepared to discuss assigned journal articles. So, he awarded students course credit for bringing a brief summary and critique of the articles to class and submitting these notes at the class's end. Most importantly, beyond offering course credit, Carkenord also returned these notes so students could use them during tests. He reported that students typically submitted notes for about 74% of the articles. Carkenord neither experimentally evaluated his instructed contingency nor explored whether offering course credit was necessary to support his students reading assigned materials and completing notes before class. It is possible that such desirable academic behavior could have been supported by allowing students to later use their notes during tests. That such use may function as a reinforcer is an implication of the Response Deprivation Hypothesis (Timberlake & Farmer-Dougan, 1991) which suggests that constraining behavior below baseline levels renders that behavior reinforcing. Constraint appears present in most test situations when notes are prohibited. But what suggests that without the prohibition students would bring notes to tests? First, when people must respond in new ways they often use prompts. For example, an instructor is likely to use note cards, overhead transparencies, or PowerPoint[R] slides when presenting new material. Similarly, students may be disposed to use notes when answering test questions on new material. The best evidence for this is students illicitly constructing and using "cheat sheets" during tests. Thus, we reasoned that sanctioning note use during tests could reinforce desirable academic behavior. More specifically, we designed a two-component treatment package which included instructions about an "attendance/submission contingency" and the contingency: only if students attended lecture and submitted hand-written notes for each day's reading assignment could they use their notes during a later test. We experimentally evaluated this "instructed contingency" in a course where the percentage of students attending lecture typically was only about 70% and, worse yet, only about 30% of the students attending reported having read the day's reading assignment. In this course, weekly tests were based primarily on material presented in the course's text. …
通过允许学生在考试期间使用笔记来增加学生的上课出勤率和备课率
许多大学生似乎对学习不感兴趣。例如,一项对一所中等规模公立大学的社会学专业的调查发现,73%的人同意他们会参加一门他们获得a但几乎没有学到东西的课程,53%的人同意老师有责任让学生在课堂上保持专注(Delucchi & Korgen, 2002)。然而,学生直接感兴趣的材料并不总是教授的。在科学的入门课程中,学生必须学习基本的原理和概念,这通常是正确的。的确,学习的重要性可能只有在学生完成课程后才会变得明显。那么,在日常的基础上,教师可能会发现自己所教授的材料对学生没有什么兴趣。因此,相当数量的学生可能从来没有或很少按时完成阅读作业(例如,康纳-格林,2000;嘶,2005;Vandehey, Marsh, & Diekhoff, 2005),许多人可能会逃课(Vandehey et al., 2005)。在不久的将来,随着越来越多的学生在外工作,这些学术行为可能会恶化。在四年制大学的学生中,大约75%的人在大学期间工作,大约25%的人全职工作,大概是为了支付不断增长的学费(Choy, 2002)。鉴于公众对高等教育的支持越来越少,有偿工作可能对学术行为产生有害影响,以及其他支持学生消费主义的突发事件——我们如何加强备课和听课?提高学生备课人数的方法之一是加强备课。例如,Carkenord(1994)希望他的学生上课时准备好讨论指定的期刊文章。因此,如果学生在课堂上提交文章的简要总结和评论,并在课程结束时提交这些笔记,他就会授予学生课程学分。最重要的是,除了提供课程学分,卡克诺德还归还了这些笔记,以便学生在考试时使用。他报告说,学生通常会为大约74%的文章提交笔记。卡肯诺德既没有通过实验来评估他所指导的偶然性,也没有探索是否有必要提供课程学分来支持他的学生在课前阅读指定的材料和完成笔记。如果允许学生在以后的考试中使用笔记,这种可取的学术行为可能会得到支持。这种使用可能会起到强化作用,这是反应剥夺假说(Timberlake & Farmer-Dougan, 1991)的暗示,该假说认为,将行为限制在基线水平以下,会使该行为得到强化。当禁止注释时,约束出现在大多数测试情况下。但是,如果没有禁令,学生们会带笔记去考试吗?首先,当人们必须以新的方式回应时,他们经常使用提示。例如,教师在展示新材料时,可能会使用笔记卡、投影仪或PowerPoint幻灯片。同样,学生在回答新材料的测试问题时可能倾向于使用笔记。最好的证据就是学生们在考试中非法构造和使用“小抄”。因此,我们推断,在考试中使用制裁笔记可以加强理想的学术行为。更具体地说,我们设计了一个由两部分组成的治疗方案,其中包括关于“出勤/提交偶然性”和偶然性的说明:只有学生参加讲座并为每天的阅读作业提交手写笔记,他们才能在以后的考试中使用这些笔记。我们在一门课程中对这种“指示偶然性”进行了实验评估,在这门课程中,听课的学生比例通常只有70%左右,更糟糕的是,只有30%的听课学生报告自己阅读了当天的阅读作业。在本课程中,每周测试主要基于课程课本中的材料。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信