Evaluation of mean velocity and turbulence measurements with ADCPs

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
E. Nystrom, C. Rehmann, K. Oberg
{"title":"Evaluation of mean velocity and turbulence measurements with ADCPs","authors":"E. Nystrom, C. Rehmann, K. Oberg","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1310)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To test the ability of acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) to measure turbulence, profiles measured with two pulse-to-pulse coherent ADCPs in a laboratory flume were compared to profiles measured with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter, and time series measured in the acoustic beam of the ADCPs were examined. A four-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station, while a three-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station and an upstream station. At the downstream station, where the turbulence intensity was low, both ADCPs reproduced the mean velocity profile well away from the flume boundaries; errors near the boundaries were due to transducer ringing, flow disturbance, and sidelobe interference. At the upstream station, where the turbulence intensity was higher, errors in the mean velocity were large. The four-beam ADCP measured the Reynolds stress profile accurately away from the bottom boundary, and these measurements can be used to estimate shear velocity. Estimates of Reynolds stress with a three-beam ADCP and turbulent kinetic energy with both ADCPs cannot be computed without further assumptions, and they are affected by flow inhomogeneity. Neither ADCP measured integral time scales to within 60%.","PeriodicalId":16046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","volume":"133 1","pages":"1310-1318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1310)","citationCount":"90","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1310)","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

Abstract

To test the ability of acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) to measure turbulence, profiles measured with two pulse-to-pulse coherent ADCPs in a laboratory flume were compared to profiles measured with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter, and time series measured in the acoustic beam of the ADCPs were examined. A four-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station, while a three-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station and an upstream station. At the downstream station, where the turbulence intensity was low, both ADCPs reproduced the mean velocity profile well away from the flume boundaries; errors near the boundaries were due to transducer ringing, flow disturbance, and sidelobe interference. At the upstream station, where the turbulence intensity was higher, errors in the mean velocity were large. The four-beam ADCP measured the Reynolds stress profile accurately away from the bottom boundary, and these measurements can be used to estimate shear velocity. Estimates of Reynolds stress with a three-beam ADCP and turbulent kinetic energy with both ADCPs cannot be computed without further assumptions, and they are affected by flow inhomogeneity. Neither ADCP measured integral time scales to within 60%.
用ADCPs对平均速度和湍流测量的评价
为了测试声学多普勒电流剖面仪(ADCPs)测量湍流的能力,在实验室水槽中用两个脉冲对脉冲相干ADCPs测量的剖面与用声学多普勒测速仪测量的剖面进行了比较,并检查了ADCPs声束测量的时间序列。下游站采用四波束ADCP,下游站和上游站采用三波束ADCP。在湍流强度较低的下游站,两种ADCPs均能较好地再现离水槽边界较远的平均流速剖面;边界附近的误差主要由换能器振铃、流动干扰和旁瓣干扰引起。上游站湍流强度较大,平均速度误差较大。四梁ADCP精确测量了远离井底边界的雷诺数应力分布,这些测量结果可用于估计剪切速度。如果没有进一步的假设,三梁ADCP的雷诺应力估计和两种ADCP的湍流动能估计就无法计算,而且它们受到流动不均匀性的影响。两个ADCP测量的积分时间尺度都在60%以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydraulic Engineering accepts original contributions that describe the analysis and solutions of problems in hydraulic engineering. Technical Notes may present a problem, without solution, of common interest. Topics range from flows in closed conduits to free-surface flows (canals, rivers, lakes, and estuaries) to environmental fluid dynamics. Topics include transport processes involving fluids (multiphase flows) such as sediment and contaminant transport, and heat and gas transfers. Emphasis is placed on the presentation of concepts, methods, techniques, and results that advance knowledge and/or are suitable for general application in the hydraulic engineering profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书