Imanuel R. Lerman MD, MS , Dmitri Souzdalnitski MD, PhD , Thomas Halaszynski DMD, MD, MBA , Feng Dai PhD , Maged Guirguis MD , Samer N. Narouze MD, PhD, FIPP
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulation and trainee performance","authors":"Imanuel R. Lerman MD, MS , Dmitri Souzdalnitski MD, PhD , Thomas Halaszynski DMD, MD, MBA , Feng Dai PhD , Maged Guirguis MD , Samer N. Narouze MD, PhD, FIPP","doi":"10.1053/j.trap.2015.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The objective of this study was to measureand record trainee performance during an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) with a novel high fidelity feedback based simulator device. The method decribes a novel phantom simulator that was built, capable of objectively recording trainee performance and providing visual and </span>audio feedback<span> on the completion of a successful FNB. Overall, 33 subjects were comprised of medical students and residents performed 2 separate ultrasound simulation sessions, and were placed in 1 of 3 groups: light emitting diode and piezoelectric buzzer feedback (LED and PBZ), voice feedback alone, or no feedback. This phantom simulator measured 2 separate performance parameters including; the time (in seconds) to carry out a FNB and the number of needle passes. Each trainee was then evaluated with a global rating scale. Trainee confidence in ultrasound-guided procedures was also recorded.</span></p><p>All trainees improved their performance in the simulated block time (<em>p</em> < 0.005) and gained significant confidence in ultrasound-guided procedures (<em>p</em> < 0.0005). The LED and PBZ group improved the most in block time performance (<em>p</em> < 0.0001). Only the LED and PBZ group improved in visualizing the simulated nerve and advancing needle (<em>p</em> < 0.05), as well as simultaneously visualizing the needle reach the simulated nerve target (<em>p</em> < 0.005). For all groups there was robust correlation (−0.72, <em>p</em> < 0.0001) between the time to carry out a FNB and correct visualization of the needle during a successful FNB.</p><p>The high fidelity ultrasound phantom simulator used in this study, recorded and improved performance, and confidence in ultrasound guided procedures carried out by novice trainees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93817,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.trap.2015.10.008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084208X1500035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The objective of this study was to measureand record trainee performance during an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) with a novel high fidelity feedback based simulator device. The method decribes a novel phantom simulator that was built, capable of objectively recording trainee performance and providing visual and audio feedback on the completion of a successful FNB. Overall, 33 subjects were comprised of medical students and residents performed 2 separate ultrasound simulation sessions, and were placed in 1 of 3 groups: light emitting diode and piezoelectric buzzer feedback (LED and PBZ), voice feedback alone, or no feedback. This phantom simulator measured 2 separate performance parameters including; the time (in seconds) to carry out a FNB and the number of needle passes. Each trainee was then evaluated with a global rating scale. Trainee confidence in ultrasound-guided procedures was also recorded.
All trainees improved their performance in the simulated block time (p < 0.005) and gained significant confidence in ultrasound-guided procedures (p < 0.0005). The LED and PBZ group improved the most in block time performance (p < 0.0001). Only the LED and PBZ group improved in visualizing the simulated nerve and advancing needle (p < 0.05), as well as simultaneously visualizing the needle reach the simulated nerve target (p < 0.005). For all groups there was robust correlation (−0.72, p < 0.0001) between the time to carry out a FNB and correct visualization of the needle during a successful FNB.
The high fidelity ultrasound phantom simulator used in this study, recorded and improved performance, and confidence in ultrasound guided procedures carried out by novice trainees.