Minimally invasive treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: Current concepts and state-of-the-art technologies

Sean M. Tutton MD , Francis R. Facchini MD , Larry E. Miller PhD
{"title":"Minimally invasive treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: Current concepts and state-of-the-art technologies","authors":"Sean M. Tutton MD , Francis R. Facchini MD , Larry E. Miller PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.trap.2013.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common in the elderly and can result in debilitating pain, loss of function, kyphosis with resulting height loss, and reductions in quality of life. Conservative treatment of VCFs is considered the gold standard but has limited effectiveness after the initial 23-week period when the majority of uncomplicated VCFs resolve. Surgical intervention is invasive and associated with morbidity, particularly in the elderly patient with poor bone quality. Percutaneous techniques such as vertebroplasty and vertebral augmentation have revolutionized the treatment of VCFs by filling the treatment gap between conservative care and surgery. A robust series of randomized controlled trials and case series have demonstrated effective pain reduction, function improvement, and acceptable safety with these procedures. However, limitations still exist with these techniques including the need for bipedicular access, inadequate vertebral height restoration, trabecular destruction with balloon-based techniques, inability to precisely control cement delivery, and significant radiation exposure to patients and physicians. New technologies are emerging that retain the clinical advantages of traditional percutaneous vertebroplasty and vertebral augmentation while minimizing these limitations. This review article discusses the history of minimally invasive VCF treatment, summarizes clinical evidence with these therapies, and highlights the most innovative experimental and commercial technologies available today.","PeriodicalId":93817,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","volume":"16 2","pages":"Pages 118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.trap.2013.02.008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084208X1300013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common in the elderly and can result in debilitating pain, loss of function, kyphosis with resulting height loss, and reductions in quality of life. Conservative treatment of VCFs is considered the gold standard but has limited effectiveness after the initial 23-week period when the majority of uncomplicated VCFs resolve. Surgical intervention is invasive and associated with morbidity, particularly in the elderly patient with poor bone quality. Percutaneous techniques such as vertebroplasty and vertebral augmentation have revolutionized the treatment of VCFs by filling the treatment gap between conservative care and surgery. A robust series of randomized controlled trials and case series have demonstrated effective pain reduction, function improvement, and acceptable safety with these procedures. However, limitations still exist with these techniques including the need for bipedicular access, inadequate vertebral height restoration, trabecular destruction with balloon-based techniques, inability to precisely control cement delivery, and significant radiation exposure to patients and physicians. New technologies are emerging that retain the clinical advantages of traditional percutaneous vertebroplasty and vertebral augmentation while minimizing these limitations. This review article discusses the history of minimally invasive VCF treatment, summarizes clinical evidence with these therapies, and highlights the most innovative experimental and commercial technologies available today.
骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的微创治疗:当前概念和最新技术
骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VCFs)在老年人中很常见,可导致衰弱性疼痛、功能丧失、脊柱后凸并导致身高下降和生活质量下降。vcf的保守治疗被认为是金标准,但在最初的2 - 3周后,大多数无并发症的vcf消退,其疗效有限。手术干预是侵入性的,并且与发病率相关,特别是在骨质量差的老年患者中。椎体成形术和椎体隆胸等经皮技术填补了保守治疗和手术治疗之间的空白,彻底改变了vcf的治疗。一系列可靠的随机对照试验和病例系列表明,这些手术有效地减轻了疼痛,改善了功能,并具有可接受的安全性。然而,这些技术仍然存在局限性,包括需要双椎弓根通路,椎体高度恢复不足,球囊技术破坏小梁,无法精确控制水泥输送,以及对患者和医生的严重辐射暴露。新技术不断涌现,保留了传统经皮椎体成形术和椎体增强术的临床优势,同时最大限度地减少了这些局限性。这篇综述文章讨论了微创VCF治疗的历史,总结了这些治疗的临床证据,并强调了当今最具创新性的实验和商业技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信