Navigated Transconjunctival Endoscopic Approaches to the Orbit

G. Feigl, B. Krischek, R. Ritz, K. Ramina, A. Korn, M. Tatagiba
{"title":"Navigated Transconjunctival Endoscopic Approaches to the Orbit","authors":"G. Feigl, B. Krischek, R. Ritz, K. Ramina, A. Korn, M. Tatagiba","doi":"10.1055/S-0032-1312089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard cranial approaches to the orbit involve lengthy skin incisions, extensive soft tissue dissection, and large craniotomies, increasing morbidity.To evaluate less invasive approaches to the orbit, using endoscopic transconjunctival approaches.Neuronavigated transconjunctival approaches to the orbit were performed on 4 cadavers using 30°/3 mm and 0°/6 mm rigid endoscopes. A special head frame was designed for this study to prevent excessive movement of the endoscope tip in the orbit. Lateral and medial transconjunctival supra- and infrabulbar approaches to the extra- and intraconal spaces were performed. The incision length, maximal penetration depth in the extra- and intraconal spaces, and distance from the orbital rim to the optic nerve were measured.All 4 approaches afforded satisfactory exposure and access to the extra- and intraconal spaces. The mean incision length for the transconjunctival approach was 10.4 mm. The optic nerve could be exposed through all 4 approaches. The mean maximal penetration depths in the extraconal space were 28.6 ± 3.5 mm for the 30°/3 mm and 20.7 ± 4.5 mm for the 0°/6 mm endoscope. In the intraconal space, the mean maximal depth of penetration was 23.8 ± 2.4 mm for the 30°/3 mm and 19.4 ± 3.4 mm for the 0°/6 mm endoscope. Based on these measurements, the orbit was classified into quadrants and zones.Transconjunctival endoscopic approaches to the orbit allow maximal exposure of the extra- and intraconal spaces through a minimally invasive approach requiring no muscle transection. Infrabulbar approaches have better cosmetic results than suprabulbar approaches, which require incision of the eyelid.","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/S-0032-1312089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0032-1312089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard cranial approaches to the orbit involve lengthy skin incisions, extensive soft tissue dissection, and large craniotomies, increasing morbidity.To evaluate less invasive approaches to the orbit, using endoscopic transconjunctival approaches.Neuronavigated transconjunctival approaches to the orbit were performed on 4 cadavers using 30°/3 mm and 0°/6 mm rigid endoscopes. A special head frame was designed for this study to prevent excessive movement of the endoscope tip in the orbit. Lateral and medial transconjunctival supra- and infrabulbar approaches to the extra- and intraconal spaces were performed. The incision length, maximal penetration depth in the extra- and intraconal spaces, and distance from the orbital rim to the optic nerve were measured.All 4 approaches afforded satisfactory exposure and access to the extra- and intraconal spaces. The mean incision length for the transconjunctival approach was 10.4 mm. The optic nerve could be exposed through all 4 approaches. The mean maximal penetration depths in the extraconal space were 28.6 ± 3.5 mm for the 30°/3 mm and 20.7 ± 4.5 mm for the 0°/6 mm endoscope. In the intraconal space, the mean maximal depth of penetration was 23.8 ± 2.4 mm for the 30°/3 mm and 19.4 ± 3.4 mm for the 0°/6 mm endoscope. Based on these measurements, the orbit was classified into quadrants and zones.Transconjunctival endoscopic approaches to the orbit allow maximal exposure of the extra- and intraconal spaces through a minimally invasive approach requiring no muscle transection. Infrabulbar approaches have better cosmetic results than suprabulbar approaches, which require incision of the eyelid.
导航经结膜内镜入路进入眼眶
标准的颅脑入路涉及长时间的皮肤切口、广泛的软组织剥离和大开颅手术,增加了发病率。目的探讨内镜下经结膜入路进入眶部的微创方法。使用30°/ 3mm和0°/ 6mm刚性内窥镜对4具尸体进行神经导航经结膜入路。本研究设计了一个特殊的头架,以防止内窥镜尖端在眶内过度运动。外侧和内侧经结膜球上和球下入路进入球外和球内间隙。测量切口长度、眶外腔和眶内腔的最大穿透深度、眶缘到视神经的距离。所有4种入路均能获得满意的暴露和进入腔外和腔内空间。经结膜入路的平均切口长度为10.4 mm。视神经可通过4种入路显露。30°/3 mm内窥镜的最大穿刺深度为28.6±3.5 mm, 0°/6 mm内窥镜的最大穿刺深度为20.7±4.5 mm。在腔内空间,30°/3 mm内窥镜的平均最大穿透深度为23.8±2.4 mm, 0°/6 mm内窥镜的平均最大穿透深度为19.4±3.4 mm。根据这些测量结果,将轨道划分为象限和区域。经结膜内窥镜入路可通过微创入路最大限度地暴露眶外和眶内间隙,无需横断肌肉。球下入路比需要切开眼睑的球上入路有更好的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信