Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
D. Duc Trung
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes","authors":"D. Duc Trung","doi":"10.1051/mfreview/2022003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of cutting machining methods is generally evaluated through many parameters such as surface roughness, material removal rate, cutting force, etc. A machining process is considered highly efficient when it meets the requirements for these parameters, such as ensuring small surface roughness, high material removal rate, or small cutting force, etc. However, for each specific machining condition, sometimes the objective functions give contradictory requirements. In this case, it is necessary to implement multi-criteria decision making, i.e., make a decision to ensure harmonization of all required objectives. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making study is presented for three common machining methods: milling, grinding, and turning. In each machining method, the weights of the criteria were determined by four different methods, including Equal weight, ROC weight, RS weight and Entropy weight. The MARCOS method was applied for multi-criteria decision making. The best alternative was found to be the same as the weights were determined using the Equal weight and Entropy weight methods. In the remaining two weighting methods, the best alternative found depends on the order where the criteria were arranged, not these methods themselves. Direction for further research has been suggested in this study as well.","PeriodicalId":51873,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2022003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The efficiency of cutting machining methods is generally evaluated through many parameters such as surface roughness, material removal rate, cutting force, etc. A machining process is considered highly efficient when it meets the requirements for these parameters, such as ensuring small surface roughness, high material removal rate, or small cutting force, etc. However, for each specific machining condition, sometimes the objective functions give contradictory requirements. In this case, it is necessary to implement multi-criteria decision making, i.e., make a decision to ensure harmonization of all required objectives. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making study is presented for three common machining methods: milling, grinding, and turning. In each machining method, the weights of the criteria were determined by four different methods, including Equal weight, ROC weight, RS weight and Entropy weight. The MARCOS method was applied for multi-criteria decision making. The best alternative was found to be the same as the weights were determined using the Equal weight and Entropy weight methods. In the remaining two weighting methods, the best alternative found depends on the order where the criteria were arranged, not these methods themselves. Direction for further research has been suggested in this study as well.
基于MARCOS方法和加权法的多准则决策:应用于铣削、磨削和车削加工
切削加工方法的效率一般通过许多参数来评价,如表面粗糙度、材料去除率、切削力等。当加工过程满足这些参数的要求时,例如确保小的表面粗糙度,高的材料去除率或小的切削力等,则认为加工过程是高效的。然而,对于每一种具体的加工条件,目标函数有时会给出相互矛盾的要求。在这种情况下,有必要实施多标准决策,即做出决策以确保所有所需目标的协调一致。本文研究了铣削、磨削和车削三种常用加工方法的多准则决策问题。在每种加工方法中,通过四种不同的方法确定准则的权重,包括Equal weight、ROC weight、RS weight和Entropy weight。采用MARCOS方法进行多准则决策。采用等权法和熵权法确定了各指标的权重,得出了最佳方案。在剩下的两种加权方法中,找到的最佳替代方法取决于标准的排列顺序,而不是这些方法本身。本研究还提出了进一步研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Review
Manufacturing Review ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to stimulate and record an international forum for disseminating knowledge on the advances, developments and applications of manufacturing engineering, technology and applied sciences with a focus on critical reviews of developments in manufacturing and emerging trends in this field. The journal intends to establish a specific focus on reviews of developments of key core topics and on the emerging technologies concerning manufacturing engineering, technology and applied sciences, the aim of which is to provide readers with rapid and easy access to definitive and authoritative knowledge and research-backed opinions on future developments. The scope includes, but is not limited to critical reviews and outstanding original research papers on the advances, developments and applications of: Materials for advanced manufacturing (Metals, Polymers, Glass, Ceramics, Composites, Nano-materials, etc.) and recycling, Material processing methods and technology (Machining, Forming/Shaping, Casting, Powder Metallurgy, Laser technology, Joining, etc.), Additive/rapid manufacturing methods and technology, Tooling and surface-engineering technology (fabrication, coating, heat treatment, etc.), Micro-manufacturing methods and technology, Nano-manufacturing methods and technology, Advanced metrology, instrumentation, quality assurance, testing and inspection, Mechatronics for manufacturing automation, Manufacturing machinery and manufacturing systems, Process chain integration and manufacturing platforms, Sustainable manufacturing and Life-cycle analysis, Industry case studies involving applications of the state-of-the-art manufacturing methods, technology and systems. Content will include invited reviews, original research articles, and invited special topic contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信