Study of cutting force and tool wear during turning of aluminium with WC, PCD and HFCVD coated MCD tools

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING

Manufacturing Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1051/mfreview/2020026

S. K. Pattnaik, M. Behera, S. Padhi, P. Dash, S. K. Sarangi

{"title":"Study of cutting force and tool wear during turning of aluminium with WC, PCD and HFCVD coated MCD tools","authors":"S. K. Pattnaik, M. Behera, S. Padhi, P. Dash, S. K. Sarangi","doi":"10.1051/mfreview/2020026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enormous developmental work has been made in synthesis of metastable diamond by hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) method. In this paper, micro-crystalline diamond (MCD) was deposited on WC–6 wt.% Co cutting tool inserts by HFCVD technique. The MCD coated tool was characterized by the scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro Raman spectroscopy (μ-RS). A comparison was made among the MCD tool, uncoated tungsten carbide (WC) tool and polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool during the dry turning of rolled aluminum. The various major tests were conducted such as surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear, which were taken into consideration to establish a proper comparison among the advanced cutting tools. Surface roughness was measured during machining by Talysurf. The tool wear was studied by SEM after machining. The cutting forces were measured by Kistler 3D-dynamometer during the machining process. The test results indicate that, the CVD coated MCD tool and PCD tool produced almost similar results. But, the price of PCD tools are five times costlier than MCD tools. So, MCD tool would be a better alternative for machining of aluminium.","PeriodicalId":51873,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/mfreview/2020026","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2020026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Enormous developmental work has been made in synthesis of metastable diamond by hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) method. In this paper, micro-crystalline diamond (MCD) was deposited on WC–6 wt.% Co cutting tool inserts by HFCVD technique. The MCD coated tool was characterized by the scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro Raman spectroscopy (μ-RS). A comparison was made among the MCD tool, uncoated tungsten carbide (WC) tool and polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool during the dry turning of rolled aluminum. The various major tests were conducted such as surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear, which were taken into consideration to establish a proper comparison among the advanced cutting tools. Surface roughness was measured during machining by Talysurf. The tool wear was studied by SEM after machining. The cutting forces were measured by Kistler 3D-dynamometer during the machining process. The test results indicate that, the CVD coated MCD tool and PCD tool produced almost similar results. But, the price of PCD tools are five times costlier than MCD tools. So, MCD tool would be a better alternative for machining of aluminium.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用WC、PCD和HFCVD涂层MCD刀具车削铝时切削力和刀具磨损的研究

热丝化学气相沉积(HFCVD)法合成亚稳金刚石的研究取得了巨大的进展。本文将微晶金刚石(MCD)沉积在WC-6 wt上。% Co切削刀具刀片采用HFCVD技术。采用扫描电镜(SEM)、x射线衍射(XRD)和微拉曼光谱(μ-RS)对MCD涂层工具进行了表征。对MCD刀具、未涂覆碳化钨刀具和聚晶金刚石刀具干式车削轧制铝进行了比较。进行了表面粗糙度、切削力和刀具磨损等主要测试，以建立先进刀具之间的适当比较。用Talysurf测量了加工过程中的表面粗糙度。通过扫描电镜研究了加工后刀具的磨损情况。利用Kistler三维测功仪测量加工过程中的切削力。测试结果表明，CVD涂层MCD工具与PCD工具的测试结果基本一致。但是，PCD工具的价格是MCD工具的5倍。因此，MCD刀具将是铝加工的更好选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Manufacturing Review ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

12.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： The aim of the journal is to stimulate and record an international forum for disseminating knowledge on the advances, developments and applications of manufacturing engineering, technology and applied sciences with a focus on critical reviews of developments in manufacturing and emerging trends in this field. The journal intends to establish a specific focus on reviews of developments of key core topics and on the emerging technologies concerning manufacturing engineering, technology and applied sciences, the aim of which is to provide readers with rapid and easy access to definitive and authoritative knowledge and research-backed opinions on future developments. The scope includes, but is not limited to critical reviews and outstanding original research papers on the advances, developments and applications of: Materials for advanced manufacturing (Metals, Polymers, Glass, Ceramics, Composites, Nano-materials, etc.) and recycling, Material processing methods and technology (Machining, Forming/Shaping, Casting, Powder Metallurgy, Laser technology, Joining, etc.), Additive/rapid manufacturing methods and technology, Tooling and surface-engineering technology (fabrication, coating, heat treatment, etc.), Micro-manufacturing methods and technology, Nano-manufacturing methods and technology, Advanced metrology, instrumentation, quality assurance, testing and inspection, Mechatronics for manufacturing automation, Manufacturing machinery and manufacturing systems, Process chain integration and manufacturing platforms, Sustainable manufacturing and Life-cycle analysis, Industry case studies involving applications of the state-of-the-art manufacturing methods, technology and systems. Content will include invited reviews, original research articles, and invited special topic contributions.