Within the Smorgasbord of Women’s Imaging, Do We Need to Improve Our Bone Appétit?

Seminars in breast disease Pub Date : 2005-12-01 Epub Date: 2008-09-25 DOI:10.1053/j.sembd.2006.08.006
Florence C. Gellman R.T.(R)(M)(BD)RDMS(BR)CDT
{"title":"Within the Smorgasbord of Women’s Imaging, Do We Need to Improve Our Bone Appétit?","authors":"Florence C. Gellman R.T.(R)(M)(BD)RDMS(BR)CDT","doi":"10.1053/j.sembd.2006.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Bone Densitometry (DXA) has become an imaging tool used to screen and treat women for osteoporosis with a frequency approaching that of the screening </span>mammogram. In fact, they are often exams that are ordered in tandem. As was once the case with mammography, we are now beginning to discover that we need to improve our technique and possibly insist on further education and certification for those who perform and interpret DXA exams. Should the industry strive to standardize scan acquisition and analyses software to make intermanufacterer comparisons not only possible but accurately comparable? A need for Quality Assurance Program standardization is evident in the lack of facilities performing basic Quality Control testing of the unit and technologist precision studies on a regular basis. As proven in a study in 2004, there is also room for improvement in the understanding, scanning, interpreting, and reporting of pediatric bone densitometry. It seems that a standardized Quality Assurance Program is needed by a central governing body perhaps ISCD (The International Society for Clinical Densitometry). ISCD is going to begin offering Facility Accreditation for those performing these skeletal assessments. It will assess every element involved in performing DXA exams, from the qualifications of personnel to quality control testing, scan acquisition, scan analyses, interpretation, and reporting. What will become optional in the Fall of 2006 may one day be mandated as was mammography if we don’t get our bones in order.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87785,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in breast disease","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 211-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.sembd.2006.08.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in breast disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092445006000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone Densitometry (DXA) has become an imaging tool used to screen and treat women for osteoporosis with a frequency approaching that of the screening mammogram. In fact, they are often exams that are ordered in tandem. As was once the case with mammography, we are now beginning to discover that we need to improve our technique and possibly insist on further education and certification for those who perform and interpret DXA exams. Should the industry strive to standardize scan acquisition and analyses software to make intermanufacterer comparisons not only possible but accurately comparable? A need for Quality Assurance Program standardization is evident in the lack of facilities performing basic Quality Control testing of the unit and technologist precision studies on a regular basis. As proven in a study in 2004, there is also room for improvement in the understanding, scanning, interpreting, and reporting of pediatric bone densitometry. It seems that a standardized Quality Assurance Program is needed by a central governing body perhaps ISCD (The International Society for Clinical Densitometry). ISCD is going to begin offering Facility Accreditation for those performing these skeletal assessments. It will assess every element involved in performing DXA exams, from the qualifications of personnel to quality control testing, scan acquisition, scan analyses, interpretation, and reporting. What will become optional in the Fall of 2006 may one day be mandated as was mammography if we don’t get our bones in order.

在女性影像的大杂食中,我们需要改善我们的骨骼健康吗?
骨密度测量(DXA)已成为一种用于筛查和治疗女性骨质疏松症的成像工具,其频率接近筛查乳房x光检查。事实上,这些考试通常是顺序进行的。就像乳房x光检查曾经的情况一样,我们现在开始发现我们需要改进我们的技术,并可能坚持对那些执行和解释DXA检查的人进行进一步的教育和认证。行业是否应该努力标准化扫描采集和分析软件,使制造商之间的比较不仅可能而且准确地进行比较?对质量保证程序标准化的需求是显而易见的,因为缺乏对单位进行基本质量控制测试的设施和技术人员定期进行精确研究。正如2004年的一项研究所证明的那样,在儿童骨密度测量的理解、扫描、解释和报告方面也有改进的空间。似乎一个标准化的质量保证计划需要一个中央管理机构,也许是ISCD(国际临床密度测量学会)。ISCD将开始为那些进行这些骨骼评估的机构提供设施认证。它将评估执行DXA考试所涉及的每一个元素,从人员资格到质量控制测试、扫描采集、扫描分析、解释和报告。到2006年秋天,如果我们的骨骼没有整理好,可能有一天会被强制要求做乳房x光检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书