Simulation of the irradiance and yield calculation of bifacial PV systems in the USA and Germany by combining ray tracing and view factor model

IF 1.9 Q3 PHYSICS, APPLIED
Eva-Maria Grommes, Felix Schemann, Frederik Klag, Sebastian Nows, U. Blieske
{"title":"Simulation of the irradiance and yield calculation of bifacial PV systems in the USA and Germany by combining ray tracing and view factor model","authors":"Eva-Maria Grommes, Felix Schemann, Frederik Klag, Sebastian Nows, U. Blieske","doi":"10.1051/epjpv/2023003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to conventional photovoltaic (PV), there are more influencing factors in bifacial photovoltaics to be considered to calculate incoming irradiance and energy yield. Accurate models to investigate the influences of the elevation, the albedo of the ground, the shading conditions between the PV rows and many other rear-side related factors are required. This paper combines the ray tracing (RT) and view factor (VF) models to calculate the irradiance with a subsequent electrical yield calculation using the one-diode model. To verify the results of the developed open-source simulation program BifacialSimu, accurate data from a plant in Golden, USA (single-axis tracked) and a commercially operated plant in Germany (fixed-tilt) are used. Through comparisons to the actual data, it can be concluded that a combination of RT and VF models seems to be valid for longer simulation periods with several months since the relative errors balance out. The RT-only simulation accurately reproduces the precise hourly radiation and electrical yield pattern. Still, a continuous positive deviation was found, which does not even out over long periods and is thus less accurate than the VF/RT combination. A simulation for a single month with RT can take several hours. Thus, the best simulation mode results according to user requirements.","PeriodicalId":42768,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Photovoltaics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2023003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Compared to conventional photovoltaic (PV), there are more influencing factors in bifacial photovoltaics to be considered to calculate incoming irradiance and energy yield. Accurate models to investigate the influences of the elevation, the albedo of the ground, the shading conditions between the PV rows and many other rear-side related factors are required. This paper combines the ray tracing (RT) and view factor (VF) models to calculate the irradiance with a subsequent electrical yield calculation using the one-diode model. To verify the results of the developed open-source simulation program BifacialSimu, accurate data from a plant in Golden, USA (single-axis tracked) and a commercially operated plant in Germany (fixed-tilt) are used. Through comparisons to the actual data, it can be concluded that a combination of RT and VF models seems to be valid for longer simulation periods with several months since the relative errors balance out. The RT-only simulation accurately reproduces the precise hourly radiation and electrical yield pattern. Still, a continuous positive deviation was found, which does not even out over long periods and is thus less accurate than the VF/RT combination. A simulation for a single month with RT can take several hours. Thus, the best simulation mode results according to user requirements.
结合光线追踪和视场因子模型对美国和德国双面光伏系统的辐照度和产率进行模拟
与传统光伏(PV)相比,双面光伏在计算入射辐照度和产能时需要考虑更多的影响因素。需要精确的模型来研究海拔、地面反照率、PV排之间的遮阳条件和许多其他后方相关因素的影响。本文结合射线追踪(RT)和视场因子(VF)模型来计算辐照度,并使用单二极管模型计算随后的电产率。为了验证开发的开源模拟程序BifacialSimu的结果,使用了来自美国Golden工厂(单轴跟踪)和德国商业运营工厂(固定倾斜)的准确数据。通过与实际数据的比较,可以得出结论,RT和VF模型的组合在较长的模拟周期内似乎是有效的,因为相对误差抵消了几个月。RT-only模拟准确地再现了精确的每小时辐射和电产出模式。尽管如此,仍然发现了一个连续的正偏差,在很长一段时间内不均匀,因此不如VF/RT组合准确。使用RT进行一个月的模拟可能需要几个小时。因此,最佳的仿真模式结果可根据用户要求而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EPJ Photovoltaics
EPJ Photovoltaics PHYSICS, APPLIED-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信