A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees

Norman L. Kaplan, Stephanie A. Monks, Eden R. Martin
{"title":"A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees","authors":"Norman L. Kaplan,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Monks,&nbsp;Eden R. Martin","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-9218.2000.00023.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Family-based tests of linkage disequilibrium are usually based on nuclear family data including affected individuals and their parents or their unaffected siblings. A problem with these tests is that they are not valid tests of association when data from related nuclear families from larger pedigrees are used. One way to ensure validity when testing for association is to select a single nuclear family from each extended pedigree in the sample. When data are available for larger pedigrees, it would be desirable to have a valid test of linkage disequilibrium that can use all potentially informative data. In this paper we present such a test: the Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT). The PDT can use data from related nuclear families from extended pedigrees and remains valid when there is population substructure. Power simulations demonstrate that, when extended pedigree data are available, gains in power can be obtained by using the PDT rather than existing methods that only use a subset of the data. The PDT can also be more powerful than current methods when the data consist of a sample of independent nuclear families or sibships.</p>","PeriodicalId":100575,"journal":{"name":"GeneScreen","volume":"1 2","pages":"65-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1466-9218.2000.00023.x","citationCount":"463","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeneScreen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1466-9218.2000.00023.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 463

Abstract

Family-based tests of linkage disequilibrium are usually based on nuclear family data including affected individuals and their parents or their unaffected siblings. A problem with these tests is that they are not valid tests of association when data from related nuclear families from larger pedigrees are used. One way to ensure validity when testing for association is to select a single nuclear family from each extended pedigree in the sample. When data are available for larger pedigrees, it would be desirable to have a valid test of linkage disequilibrium that can use all potentially informative data. In this paper we present such a test: the Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT). The PDT can use data from related nuclear families from extended pedigrees and remains valid when there is population substructure. Power simulations demonstrate that, when extended pedigree data are available, gains in power can be obtained by using the PDT rather than existing methods that only use a subset of the data. The PDT can also be more powerful than current methods when the data consist of a sample of independent nuclear families or sibships.

一种在一般家谱中检测连锁和关联的测试
基于家庭的连锁不平衡测试通常基于核心家庭数据,包括受影响的个人及其父母或未受影响的兄弟姐妹。这些测试的一个问题是,当使用来自较大谱系的相关核心家庭的数据时,它们不是有效的关联测试。保证协会当测试有效性的一种方法是选择一个样品从每个扩展核心家庭血统。当数据可用于更大的谱系时,希望有一个有效的链接不平衡测试,可以使用所有潜在的信息数据。在本文中,我们提出了这样一个检验:系谱不平衡检验(PDT)。PDT可以使用来自扩展谱系的相关核心家庭的数据,并且在存在群体亚结构时仍然有效。功率模拟表明,当扩展谱系数据可用时,可以通过使用PDT而不是仅使用数据子集的现有方法来获得功率增益。PDT也可以比现有方法更强大的数据包含的样本独立核心家庭或兄弟姊妹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信