Music and Cochlear Implants: Not in Perfect Harmony.

K. Gfeller
{"title":"Music and Cochlear Implants: Not in Perfect Harmony.","authors":"K. Gfeller","doi":"10.1044/LEADER.FTR2.14082009.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jana has been fitting Barry Jameson’s hearing aids since he was identified with a mild hearing loss at age 5. Over time, Barry’s hearing loss has become more severe. At 16, he scores poorly on speech perception tests and he is getting less benefit from his hearing aids. Barry’s parents are considering a cochlear implant (CI). They’ve heard very positive reports about how CIs enhance speech perception, but Barry’s parents also heard that they aren’t so great for music, which Barry loves. He has been actively involved in music at school and listening to music always has been a favorite pastime. Mrs. Jameson would like Jana’s input regarding CI use when listening to speech and music. \n \nIn discussing the pros and cons of cochlear implantation, audiologists can draw on considerable research evidence regarding the benefits for speech perception. With current technology, adult CI recipients can achieve excellent word recognition in a quiet listening environment following three to six months of implant use (Wilson, 2000). \n \nThe precise temporal and coarse spectral cues that characterize signal processing effectively transmit the most salient features of speech. \n \nUnfortunately, coarse spectral cues are less effective in transmitting several key aspects of musical sounds (Kong, Stickney, & Zeng, 2004). CI recipients have similar perceptual accuracy as listeners with normal hearing for rhythm, but significantly poorer perception and appraisal of pitch, melody, and timbre (tone quality) (Gfeller, Oleson, Knutson, Breheny, Driscoll, &Olszewski, 2008). This difference helps to explain why many CI recipients show improved speech perception after a few weeks of implant use but do not show significant long-term improvements in music perception (Gfeller et al., 2008). \n \n \nAudiologists can help CI recipients optimize their perception of music by encouraging clients to: \n \n \nUse song lyrics to compensate for poor pitch and melody perception. \n \n \nRecognize that music sometimes functions as background noise. \n \n \nUse residual hearing to enhance music and speech perception. \n \n \n \n \n \nSong Lyrics as a Listening Strategy \nMusic is all around us, and one way we connect with our environment is by recognizing favorite songs. Songs associated with special events—graduation, weddings, or holidays—can form an “auditory scrapbook” of our lives. \n \nWithout musical training, most listeners with normal hearing can easily recognize commonly heard tunes such as “Happy Birthday” or “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Yet for CI recipients, this recognition isn’t an easy task. CI users may not perceive a monotonic relationship between frequency and pitch; they may experience pitch reversals or hear sensations that are not distinct musical tones. Melodies may sound monotonal, compressed, or distinctly different from the actual melodic contour. \n \nA CI user who can recognize music with lyrics may not recognize the same song without lyrics (Gfeller et al., 2008). Use of lyrics can help CI recipients compensate for poor pitch and melody perception and can improve song recognition considerably when the lyrics contain familiar vocabulary and the words are clearly articulated. Even a few familiar words in the lyrics can trigger associations, which can help the brain piece together the components of a song. The lyrics along with rhythmic cues can provide an auditory “guiderail” to help CI recipients get more meaning out of music, but this advantage is lost if instrumental accompaniment masks the lyrics. \n \nHow does this understanding of the role of lyrics translate into everyday listening situations? When engaging young CI recipients in nursery songs, such as “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” or “London Bridge,” lyrics will be easier to extract from a live singer’s voice (combined with speech reading) than from recordings of nursery songs that may have a brisk tempo and complex accompaniment. When listening to music over the radio or stereo, CI recipients can increase their ability to hear song lyrics by turning down the bass volume to reduce the masking of the vocals. Understanding can also be enhanced by following lyrics on the album cover or on Web sites.","PeriodicalId":89325,"journal":{"name":"ASHA leader","volume":"2009 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASHA leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/LEADER.FTR2.14082009.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Jana has been fitting Barry Jameson’s hearing aids since he was identified with a mild hearing loss at age 5. Over time, Barry’s hearing loss has become more severe. At 16, he scores poorly on speech perception tests and he is getting less benefit from his hearing aids. Barry’s parents are considering a cochlear implant (CI). They’ve heard very positive reports about how CIs enhance speech perception, but Barry’s parents also heard that they aren’t so great for music, which Barry loves. He has been actively involved in music at school and listening to music always has been a favorite pastime. Mrs. Jameson would like Jana’s input regarding CI use when listening to speech and music. In discussing the pros and cons of cochlear implantation, audiologists can draw on considerable research evidence regarding the benefits for speech perception. With current technology, adult CI recipients can achieve excellent word recognition in a quiet listening environment following three to six months of implant use (Wilson, 2000). The precise temporal and coarse spectral cues that characterize signal processing effectively transmit the most salient features of speech. Unfortunately, coarse spectral cues are less effective in transmitting several key aspects of musical sounds (Kong, Stickney, & Zeng, 2004). CI recipients have similar perceptual accuracy as listeners with normal hearing for rhythm, but significantly poorer perception and appraisal of pitch, melody, and timbre (tone quality) (Gfeller, Oleson, Knutson, Breheny, Driscoll, &Olszewski, 2008). This difference helps to explain why many CI recipients show improved speech perception after a few weeks of implant use but do not show significant long-term improvements in music perception (Gfeller et al., 2008). Audiologists can help CI recipients optimize their perception of music by encouraging clients to: Use song lyrics to compensate for poor pitch and melody perception. Recognize that music sometimes functions as background noise. Use residual hearing to enhance music and speech perception. Song Lyrics as a Listening Strategy Music is all around us, and one way we connect with our environment is by recognizing favorite songs. Songs associated with special events—graduation, weddings, or holidays—can form an “auditory scrapbook” of our lives. Without musical training, most listeners with normal hearing can easily recognize commonly heard tunes such as “Happy Birthday” or “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Yet for CI recipients, this recognition isn’t an easy task. CI users may not perceive a monotonic relationship between frequency and pitch; they may experience pitch reversals or hear sensations that are not distinct musical tones. Melodies may sound monotonal, compressed, or distinctly different from the actual melodic contour. A CI user who can recognize music with lyrics may not recognize the same song without lyrics (Gfeller et al., 2008). Use of lyrics can help CI recipients compensate for poor pitch and melody perception and can improve song recognition considerably when the lyrics contain familiar vocabulary and the words are clearly articulated. Even a few familiar words in the lyrics can trigger associations, which can help the brain piece together the components of a song. The lyrics along with rhythmic cues can provide an auditory “guiderail” to help CI recipients get more meaning out of music, but this advantage is lost if instrumental accompaniment masks the lyrics. How does this understanding of the role of lyrics translate into everyday listening situations? When engaging young CI recipients in nursery songs, such as “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” or “London Bridge,” lyrics will be easier to extract from a live singer’s voice (combined with speech reading) than from recordings of nursery songs that may have a brisk tempo and complex accompaniment. When listening to music over the radio or stereo, CI recipients can increase their ability to hear song lyrics by turning down the bass volume to reduce the masking of the vocals. Understanding can also be enhanced by following lyrics on the album cover or on Web sites.
音乐与人工耳蜗:并非完全和谐。
自从巴里·詹姆森在5岁时被确诊为轻度听力损失以来,贾娜就一直在为他安装助听器。随着时间的推移,巴里的听力损失变得越来越严重。16岁时,他在言语感知测试中得分很低,他从助听器中得到的好处也越来越少。巴里的父母正在考虑做人工耳蜗植入手术。他们听到了关于ci如何增强语言感知的非常积极的报道,但巴里的父母也听说它们对巴里喜欢的音乐不太好。他在学校一直积极参与音乐活动,听音乐一直是他最喜欢的消遣。Jameson夫人想听听Jana关于在听演讲和音乐时使用CI的建议。在讨论人工耳蜗植入的利弊时,听力学家可以借鉴大量关于语音感知益处的研究证据。在目前的技术下,成年CI受者在使用植入物三到六个月后,可以在安静的听力环境中获得出色的单词识别(Wilson, 2000)。表征信号处理的精确时间和粗谱线索有效地传递了语音的最显著特征。不幸的是,粗谱线索在传递音乐声音的几个关键方面效果较差(Kong, Stickney, & Zeng, 2004)。CI接受者对节奏的感知准确性与听力正常的听者相似,但对音高、旋律和音色(音质)的感知和评价明显较差(Gfeller, Oleson, Knutson, Breheny, Driscoll, &Olszewski, 2008)。这种差异有助于解释为什么许多CI接受者在植入物使用几周后表现出语音感知的改善,但在音乐感知方面没有表现出显著的长期改善(Gfeller et al., 2008)。听力学家可以帮助CI接受者优化他们对音乐的感知,通过鼓励他们:用歌词来弥补糟糕的音高和旋律感知。要认识到音乐有时只是一种背景噪音。使用残余听力来增强音乐和语言感知。音乐无处不在,我们与周围环境联系的一种方式就是识别自己喜欢的歌曲。与特殊事件有关的歌曲——毕业、婚礼或节日——可以形成我们生活的“听觉剪贴簿”。即使没有受过音乐训练,大多数听力正常的听众也能很容易地识别出“生日快乐”或“星条旗永不灭”等常见的曲调。然而,对于CI接受者来说,这种识别并不是一件容易的事。CI用户可能感觉不到频率和音高之间的单调关系;他们可能会经历音调反转或听到不是明显的音乐音调的感觉。旋律可能听起来单调,压缩,或明显不同于实际的旋律轮廓。CI用户可以识别有歌词的音乐,但可能无法识别没有歌词的同一首歌(Gfeller et al., 2008)。歌词的使用可以帮助CI接受者弥补差的音高和旋律感知,并且当歌词包含熟悉的词汇并且单词清晰地表达时,可以大大提高歌曲识别能力。即使是歌词中几个熟悉的词也能引发联想,这可以帮助大脑将一首歌的组成部分拼凑起来。歌词和节奏线索可以提供听觉上的“指南”,帮助CI接收者从音乐中获得更多的意义,但如果乐器伴奏掩盖了歌词,这种优势就会失去。这种对歌词作用的理解如何转化到日常听力中呢?当让年轻的CI接受者参与儿歌,如“闪烁,闪烁,小星星”或“伦敦桥”时,从现场歌手的声音(结合语音朗读)中提取歌词比从可能有快节奏和复杂伴奏的儿歌录音中更容易。当通过收音机或立体声听音乐时,CI接受者可以通过调低低音音量来减少人声的掩蔽来提高他们听歌词的能力。通过跟随专辑封面或网站上的歌词,也可以提高对歌曲的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信