Stephen Wilson MBBS, FRACGP, FAFRM, Warwick Ruscoe MBBS, FRACMA, FAMA, Margaret Chapman BSocStud, MPH, Rhona Miller RN, BHlthSc(Nurs)
{"title":"General practitioner–hospital communications: A review of discharge summaries","authors":"Stephen Wilson MBBS, FRACGP, FAFRM, Warwick Ruscoe MBBS, FRACMA, FAMA, Margaret Chapman BSocStud, MPH, Rhona Miller RN, BHlthSc(Nurs)","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00430.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The objective of this study was to examine the reliability, effectiveness, accuracy and timeliness of hospital to general practitioner (GP) information transfer by discharge summaries produced in a general public hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A retrospective audit of 569 patient discharge summaries and related medical records with a targeted GP interview was performed to determine receipt and clinical value of the recorded information. The main outcome measure was the number and quality of discharge summaries received by patient-nominated GPs. Summaries written for patients discharged from hospital were estimated to be received by the patient-nominated GP in 27.1% of cases. Discharge summaries audited were rated as being 63.6% accurate, with errors occurring in all facets of production. The current method of discharge summary production and distribution is unacceptable. The high number of errors (36.4%) and the low rate of receipt (27.1%), indicates that resources invested in the production of the discharge summary could be better utilized to improve information transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 4","pages":"104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00430.x","citationCount":"180","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00430.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 180
Abstract The objective of this study was to examine the reliability, effectiveness, accuracy and timeliness of hospital to general practitioner (GP) information transfer by discharge summaries produced in a general public hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A retrospective audit of 569 patient discharge summaries and related medical records with a targeted GP interview was performed to determine receipt and clinical value of the recorded information. The main outcome measure was the number and quality of discharge summaries received by patient-nominated GPs. Summaries written for patients discharged from hospital were estimated to be received by the patient-nominated GP in 27.1% of cases. Discharge summaries audited were rated as being 63.6% accurate, with errors occurring in all facets of production. The current method of discharge summary production and distribution is unacceptable. The high number of errors (36.4%) and the low rate of receipt (27.1%), indicates that resources invested in the production of the discharge summary could be better utilized to improve information transfer.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
