Bacterial leakage in obturated root canals following the use of different intracanal medicaments.

C. Barthel, S. Zimmer, G. West, J. Roulet
{"title":"Bacterial leakage in obturated root canals following the use of different intracanal medicaments.","authors":"C. Barthel, S. Zimmer, G. West, J. Roulet","doi":"10.1034/J.1600-9657.2000.016006282.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to examine whether intracanal medication prior to root canal obturation has an inhibitory effect on corono-apical penetration of bacteria. 93 single rooted teeth were instrumented and sterilized with ethylene oxide. They were assigned to three control groups and four test groups with n = 20 each. For one week, they were dressed with different medicaments: The first group with a 5% chlorhexidine gel, the second with Ledermix, the third with a fresh mix of calcium hydroxide and water and the fourth without any medication. After obturation (lateral condensation, AH26) the roots were fixed between a top and a bottom chamber. The top chamber contained 3 mL trypticase soy broth with 10(8) Staphylococcus epidermidis CFU's/mL, whereas the bottom chamber contained sterile trypticase soy broth. For one year, the mounts were incubated at 37 degrees C. They were checked on a regular basis for turbidity in their bottom chambers indicating bacterial growth. None of the test samples leaked for three months. After one year, the calcium hydroxide group had only 6 leaking samples whereas the chlorhexidine group had 14, the Ledermix group 15, and the unmedicated group had 13 leaking samples. It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study, calcium hydroxide was the medicament of choice to avoid bacterial penetration of the root canal. Ledermix did not perform better than no premedication. Chlorhexidine was superior to Ledermix in the second third of the observation period.","PeriodicalId":77113,"journal":{"name":"Endodontics & dental traumatology","volume":"16 6 1","pages":"282-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1034/J.1600-9657.2000.016006282.X","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontics & dental traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-9657.2000.016006282.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether intracanal medication prior to root canal obturation has an inhibitory effect on corono-apical penetration of bacteria. 93 single rooted teeth were instrumented and sterilized with ethylene oxide. They were assigned to three control groups and four test groups with n = 20 each. For one week, they were dressed with different medicaments: The first group with a 5% chlorhexidine gel, the second with Ledermix, the third with a fresh mix of calcium hydroxide and water and the fourth without any medication. After obturation (lateral condensation, AH26) the roots were fixed between a top and a bottom chamber. The top chamber contained 3 mL trypticase soy broth with 10(8) Staphylococcus epidermidis CFU's/mL, whereas the bottom chamber contained sterile trypticase soy broth. For one year, the mounts were incubated at 37 degrees C. They were checked on a regular basis for turbidity in their bottom chambers indicating bacterial growth. None of the test samples leaked for three months. After one year, the calcium hydroxide group had only 6 leaking samples whereas the chlorhexidine group had 14, the Ledermix group 15, and the unmedicated group had 13 leaking samples. It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study, calcium hydroxide was the medicament of choice to avoid bacterial penetration of the root canal. Ledermix did not perform better than no premedication. Chlorhexidine was superior to Ledermix in the second third of the observation period.
使用不同的管内药物后封闭根管内细菌渗漏。
本研究的目的是检查根管封闭前的管内药物是否对细菌的冠-根尖渗透有抑制作用。用环氧乙烷对93颗单根牙进行固定和消毒。随机分为3个对照组和4个试验组,每组n = 20。在一周的时间里,他们服用不同的药物:第一组服用5%的氯己定凝胶,第二组服用Ledermix,第三组服用新鲜的氢氧化钙和水的混合物,第四组不服用任何药物。封闭(侧凝,AH26)后,将根固定在顶腔和底腔之间。顶室为3 mL含有10(8)个表皮葡萄球菌CFU /mL的胰酶豆汤,底室为无菌胰酶豆汤。一年的时间里,这些坐垫在37摄氏度的温度下孵育,并定期检查底部容器的浑浊度,以显示细菌的生长。三个月没有一个测试样本泄漏。一年后,氢氧化钙组只有6个渗漏样品,而氯己定组有14个,莱德米克斯组有15个,未给药组有13个渗漏样品。由此可见,在本研究条件下,氢氧化钙是避免细菌侵入根管的首选药物。Ledermix的表现并不比没有预用药更好。氯己定在观察期的后三分之一时间优于莱德米思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信