The ‘Aulularia’ of Plautus and its Greek original

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Richard Hunter
{"title":"The ‘Aulularia’ of Plautus and its Greek original","authors":"Richard Hunter","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500004302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Aulularia has always been one of the most popular and most studied of Plautus' plays, both because of its intrinsic interest and quality and also because of its later influence in the European dramatic tradition. In the large amount of scholarly work which has been devoted to this play the identity of the author of Plautus' Greek model and the alterations which Plautus may have made in this model have been much discussed. Research on these questions was, however, placed on a quite new footing in 1958 by the publication of Menander's Dyscolus: the striking similarities between these plays have now produced a loose consensus of scholarly opinion, although the dissenting voice can still be heard. The two conclusions upon which most scholars who have written recently on this subject seem to agree are that the Plautine changes to the Greek model were relatively minor, consisting in the omission of one or two scenes and the expansion of a couple of others, and that Menander was the author of the Greek original. Although it will become clear that I am very sceptical of the former of these propositions and have at least an open mind on the latter, the aim of this present paper is simply to re-open discussion of the relationship between the Aulularia and its Greek original by pointing to some problems which have been neglected and to others which have not yet been satisfactorily answered. In Part I I discuss the division of the Greek original into five acts and the conclusions to be drawn from difficulties in this division and in Part II I examine a further problem in the Aulularia which might have some bearing on the question of the authorship of the Greek original.","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"37-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500004302","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The Aulularia has always been one of the most popular and most studied of Plautus' plays, both because of its intrinsic interest and quality and also because of its later influence in the European dramatic tradition. In the large amount of scholarly work which has been devoted to this play the identity of the author of Plautus' Greek model and the alterations which Plautus may have made in this model have been much discussed. Research on these questions was, however, placed on a quite new footing in 1958 by the publication of Menander's Dyscolus: the striking similarities between these plays have now produced a loose consensus of scholarly opinion, although the dissenting voice can still be heard. The two conclusions upon which most scholars who have written recently on this subject seem to agree are that the Plautine changes to the Greek model were relatively minor, consisting in the omission of one or two scenes and the expansion of a couple of others, and that Menander was the author of the Greek original. Although it will become clear that I am very sceptical of the former of these propositions and have at least an open mind on the latter, the aim of this present paper is simply to re-open discussion of the relationship between the Aulularia and its Greek original by pointing to some problems which have been neglected and to others which have not yet been satisfactorily answered. In Part I I discuss the division of the Greek original into five acts and the conclusions to be drawn from difficulties in this division and in Part II I examine a further problem in the Aulularia which might have some bearing on the question of the authorship of the Greek original.
普劳图斯的《奥古拉里亚》及其希腊原文
《乌拉里亚》一直是普劳图斯最受欢迎和研究最多的戏剧之一,这既是因为它的内在趣味和质量,也是因为它后来对欧洲戏剧传统的影响。在大量研究这部戏剧的学术著作中,关于普劳图斯希腊模型作者的身份,以及普劳图斯在这个模型中可能做出的改变,都被讨论得很多。然而,对这些问题的研究在1958年被米南德的《失智症》(Dyscolus)的出版置于一个全新的立脚点上:这些戏剧之间惊人的相似之处现在已经产生了学术观点的松散共识,尽管仍然可以听到不同的声音。最近在这个问题上著述的大多数学者似乎都同意的两个结论是:普劳丁对希腊模型的改动相对较小,包括省略了一两个场景和扩展了其他几个场景,以及米南德是希腊原版的作者。虽然很明显,我对前一个命题持怀疑态度,至少对后一个命题持开放态度,但本文的目的只是通过指出一些被忽视的问题和其他尚未得到令人满意回答的问题,重新开始讨论《奥ulularia》与其希腊原版之间的关系。在第一部分中,我讨论了希腊原著分为五幕的问题,以及从这种划分的困难中得出的结论,在第二部分中,我研究了奥拉利亚的一个进一步的问题,这个问题可能与希腊原著的作者身份有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信