{"title":"Trajan's Forum: a Plea","authors":"H. Plommer","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500002923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On page 318 of F. M. Simpson's History of Architectural Development , vol. 1 (Longmans, 1956) I reprinted as fig. 107 the plan of Trajan's Forum from the earlier edition. I reprint it again here as Fig. 1. The plan is Lanciani's ( Forma Urbis Romae , Milan, 1893, IV, 1). Compare R. Lanciani, Ruins and Excavations (London, 1897), fig. 119. This has drawn on me the strictures of scholars. Thus R. Martin writes ( Revue des Etudes anciennes , p. 404, n. 1) that my book commits an ‘erreur dans le plan du forum de Trajan, qui ne rend pas la forme circulaire du cote meridional de la cour reconnu par G. Lugli’. By which he seems to mean that my plan makes the front wall of the court, to each side of the triumphal arch, straight and not segmental. A. von Gerkan, in Gymnasium , 1958, p. 545, remarks that in my book ‘gar zu oft hoffnungslos veraltetes Material vorgelegt wird. Das Trajansforum Abb. 107 ist ein groteskes Beispiel dafur’. Alas! following his usual custom, he gives no evidence for his statements, gladly though I should learn about these things.","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"54-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1960-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500002923","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500002923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
On page 318 of F. M. Simpson's History of Architectural Development , vol. 1 (Longmans, 1956) I reprinted as fig. 107 the plan of Trajan's Forum from the earlier edition. I reprint it again here as Fig. 1. The plan is Lanciani's ( Forma Urbis Romae , Milan, 1893, IV, 1). Compare R. Lanciani, Ruins and Excavations (London, 1897), fig. 119. This has drawn on me the strictures of scholars. Thus R. Martin writes ( Revue des Etudes anciennes , p. 404, n. 1) that my book commits an ‘erreur dans le plan du forum de Trajan, qui ne rend pas la forme circulaire du cote meridional de la cour reconnu par G. Lugli’. By which he seems to mean that my plan makes the front wall of the court, to each side of the triumphal arch, straight and not segmental. A. von Gerkan, in Gymnasium , 1958, p. 545, remarks that in my book ‘gar zu oft hoffnungslos veraltetes Material vorgelegt wird. Das Trajansforum Abb. 107 ist ein groteskes Beispiel dafur’. Alas! following his usual custom, he gives no evidence for his statements, gladly though I should learn about these things.
在F. M. Simpson的《建筑发展史》第1卷第318页(Longmans出版社,1956年),我将图拉真广场的平面图作为图107从早期版本中转载。我把它重新印在图1中。该计划是兰西亚尼的(Forma Urbis Romae,米兰,1893,IV, 1)。比较R.兰西亚尼,遗址和发掘(伦敦,1897),图119。这使我受到学者们的批评。因此,R. Martin写道(Revue des Etudes anciennes,第404页,第1页),我的书犯了一个“错误”,即“错误地规划了图拉真论坛,错误地规划了图拉真论坛,错误地规划了图拉真论坛,错误地规划了图拉真论坛。”他的意思似乎是说,我的计划是把庭院的前墙,凯旋门的每一边,都做成笔直的,而不是分段的。A. von Gerkan,在体育馆,1958,第545页,在我的书“gar zu of hoffnungslos veraltetes Material vorgelegt wind”中评论道。《绘画论坛》[b] . 107 . ist in groteskes Beispiel dafur。唉!按照他的习惯,他没有为他的陈述提供证据,尽管我应该了解这些事情。