Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: allusion and exemplarity 1

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
R. Clare
{"title":"Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: allusion and exemplarity 1","authors":"R. Clare","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500002042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sixty-fourth poem of Catullus, a work which has in times past been dismissed as contrived, is now appreciated precisely because it is carefully contrived. The majority of modern scholarship seems willing, implicitly or explicitly, to look upon the poem's intricacies and apparent contradictions as constituting part of its attraction, acknowledging that artifice does not necessarily preclude art. The complexities of poem 64 are contingent to a large degree upon its interaction with earlier poetic models. Structural devices of narrative are borrowed from a variety of sources; themes and scenes are delineated so as to reveal their full meaning through reader awareness of other works; literary allusions pervade the text. Perhaps the most salient intertextual feature of Catullus' epyllion is its interaction with previous literary treatments of the myth of Jason and Medea. In this regard, it has long been recognised that a poem of central importance for the reading of Catullus 64 is the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, and this present exploration of allusion in poem 64 will concentrate on the intertextual connections between 64 and its Hellenistic epic predecessor.","PeriodicalId":53950,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Classical Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"60-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0068673500002042","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500002042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

The sixty-fourth poem of Catullus, a work which has in times past been dismissed as contrived, is now appreciated precisely because it is carefully contrived. The majority of modern scholarship seems willing, implicitly or explicitly, to look upon the poem's intricacies and apparent contradictions as constituting part of its attraction, acknowledging that artifice does not necessarily preclude art. The complexities of poem 64 are contingent to a large degree upon its interaction with earlier poetic models. Structural devices of narrative are borrowed from a variety of sources; themes and scenes are delineated so as to reveal their full meaning through reader awareness of other works; literary allusions pervade the text. Perhaps the most salient intertextual feature of Catullus' epyllion is its interaction with previous literary treatments of the myth of Jason and Medea. In this regard, it has long been recognised that a poem of central importance for the reading of Catullus 64 is the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, and this present exploration of allusion in poem 64 will concentrate on the intertextual connections between 64 and its Hellenistic epic predecessor.
卡图卢斯64和阿波罗尼乌斯·罗迪乌斯的阿尔戈瑙蒂卡:典故和例证1
卡图卢斯的第六十四首诗,在过去被认为是做作的作品,现在被欣赏正是因为它是精心设计的。大多数现代学者似乎都愿意,或隐或明地,把这首诗的错综复杂和明显的矛盾视为其吸引力的一部分,承认技巧并不一定排斥艺术。第64首诗的复杂性在很大程度上取决于它与早期诗歌模式的相互作用。叙事的结构手段有多种来源;描绘主题和场景,通过读者对其他作品的意识来揭示其全部意义;文学典故在文中比比皆是。也许卡图卢斯的史诗最显著的互文特征是它与先前文学对伊阿宋和美狄亚神话的处理的相互作用。在这方面,人们早就认识到,一首对《卡图卢斯64》的阅读至关重要的诗是阿波罗尼乌斯·罗迪乌斯的《阿尔戈瑙蒂卡》,而现在对《64》中典故的探索将集中在《64》与其希腊史诗前辈之间的互文联系上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信