Johann Heinrich Lambert. Philosophische Schriften. Vol. VIII: Kleinere philosophische Abhandlungen und Rezensionen. edited by A. Emmel and A. Spree, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, Zurich and New York 2007, Part 1: xlii + pp. 1–474; Part 2: pp. 475–763.
{"title":"Johann Heinrich Lambert. Philosophische Schriften. Vol. VIII: Kleinere philosophische Abhandlungen und Rezensionen. edited by A. Emmel and A. Spree, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, Zurich and New York 2007, Part 1: xlii + pp. 1–474; Part 2: pp. 475–763.","authors":"V. Peckhaus","doi":"10.1017/S107989860000175X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"They report the results, which include 0% getting the correct answer, and in the following discussion mention that their results are typical. The second interlude is the Linda problem. Linda is described (in more detail than this) as being socially concerned and left-leaning. Then eight statements (a)–(h) about Linda are listed, and the subject is asked to rank them in order of probability. Six are red herrings. The two of interest are: (f) Linda is a bank teller, and (h) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement. Apparently the majority of participants rank (h) as more likely than (f), presumably because it contains some information more consistent with the overall image of Linda, even though (h) implies (f) whereas (f) does not imply (h). (The authors report that these two phenomena and variants have been intensely studied by psychologists. In fact, one of the researchers behind the latter test, Kahneman, was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002 for this work, done with Tversky, who had by then passed away.) Another charm of the book are the many photographs of (or, if that is not possible, graphics related to) important figures in logic, with a snippet about their contribution to the field. In fact, the first chapter is just two pages devoted to five mathematicians from Euclid to Gentzen addressing the question as to what mathematics is (as well as a one-page pronunciation guide). Along the way we also meet de Morgan, Łukasiewicz, Hilbert, Peirce, Post, Hintikka, Bolzano, and others. When deciding whether to use this for your course, beside the considerations already mentioned, another along which this fares favorably is price. At $59, it is a chunk cheaper than Mendelson ($85) and Enderton ($102), even if the former is paperback and the latter two hardcover. With the authors’ teaching experience behind them, their offering is well worth considering for your introductory, undergraduate logic course. Robert Lubarsky Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. Robert.Lubarsky@alum.mit.edu.","PeriodicalId":55307,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"14 1","pages":"267 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S107989860000175X","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S107989860000175X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
They report the results, which include 0% getting the correct answer, and in the following discussion mention that their results are typical. The second interlude is the Linda problem. Linda is described (in more detail than this) as being socially concerned and left-leaning. Then eight statements (a)–(h) about Linda are listed, and the subject is asked to rank them in order of probability. Six are red herrings. The two of interest are: (f) Linda is a bank teller, and (h) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement. Apparently the majority of participants rank (h) as more likely than (f), presumably because it contains some information more consistent with the overall image of Linda, even though (h) implies (f) whereas (f) does not imply (h). (The authors report that these two phenomena and variants have been intensely studied by psychologists. In fact, one of the researchers behind the latter test, Kahneman, was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002 for this work, done with Tversky, who had by then passed away.) Another charm of the book are the many photographs of (or, if that is not possible, graphics related to) important figures in logic, with a snippet about their contribution to the field. In fact, the first chapter is just two pages devoted to five mathematicians from Euclid to Gentzen addressing the question as to what mathematics is (as well as a one-page pronunciation guide). Along the way we also meet de Morgan, Łukasiewicz, Hilbert, Peirce, Post, Hintikka, Bolzano, and others. When deciding whether to use this for your course, beside the considerations already mentioned, another along which this fares favorably is price. At $59, it is a chunk cheaper than Mendelson ($85) and Enderton ($102), even if the former is paperback and the latter two hardcover. With the authors’ teaching experience behind them, their offering is well worth considering for your introductory, undergraduate logic course. Robert Lubarsky Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. Robert.Lubarsky@alum.mit.edu.
他们报告了结果,其中0%的人得到了正确的答案,并在接下来的讨论中提到他们的结果是典型的。第二个插曲是琳达的问题。琳达被描述为(比这更详细)关心社会和左倾。然后列出8个关于Linda的陈述(a) - (h),并要求被试按概率对它们进行排序。六个是转移注意力。我们感兴趣的两件事是:(f)琳达是一名银行出纳,(h)琳达是一名积极参与女权运动的银行出纳。显然,大多数参与者认为(h)比(f)更有可能,大概是因为它包含了一些与琳达整体形象更一致的信息,尽管(h)暗示了(f),而(f)并不暗示(h)。(作者报告说,心理学家对这两种现象和变体进行了深入研究。)事实上,后一项测试的研究人员之一卡尼曼(Kahneman)曾因此项研究获得2002年的诺贝尔经济学奖(Nobel Memorial Prize In Economic Sciences),当时他与特沃斯基(Tversky)共同完成了这项研究,特沃斯基当时已经去世。)这本书的另一个魅力在于许多逻辑学重要人物的照片(或者,如果不可能的话,与之相关的图形),以及他们对该领域的贡献。事实上,第一章只有两页,专门讨论了从欧几里得到根岑的五位数学家关于数学是什么的问题(以及一页的发音指南)。一路上,我们还会见了德·摩根、Łukasiewicz、希尔伯特、皮尔斯、波斯特、欣蒂卡、博尔扎诺等人。当决定是否在你的课程中使用它时,除了已经提到的考虑之外,另一个有利的因素是价格。59美元的价格比门德尔松(85美元)和恩德顿(102美元)便宜很多,即使前者是平装本,后者是精装本。由于作者的教学经验,他们的作品非常值得你在本科逻辑入门课程中考虑。Robert Lubarsky佛罗里达大西洋大学数学科学系,美国佛罗里达州博卡拉顿33431Robert.Lubarsky@alum.mit.edu。
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic was established in 1995 by the Association for Symbolic Logic to provide a journal of high standards that would be both accessible and of interest to as wide an audience as possible. It is designed to cover all areas within the purview of the ASL: mathematical logic and its applications, philosophical and non-classical logic and its applications, history and philosophy of logic, and philosophy and methodology of mathematics.