L. M. Ward, Enrica Bridgewater, Nicole M. Overstreet
{"title":"Media Use and Black Emerging Adults' Acceptance of Jezebel and Sapphire Stereotypes","authors":"L. M. Ward, Enrica Bridgewater, Nicole M. Overstreet","doi":"10.1027/1864-1105/a000390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Although African Americans are increasingly featured on TV, persistent stereotypes of Black women remain that frame them as hypersexual Jezebels or verbally aggressive Sapphires. Priming participants with these stereotypes negatively affects White emerging adults’ perceptions of Black women; however, parallel findings among Black participants have yet to emerge. We investigated this dynamic via two studies, testing mechanisms proposed by cultivation, social cognitive, and social identity theories. In Study 1, 204 Black emerging adults reported their exposure to 6 reality programs and 17 dramas that prominently feature Black women, their perceptions of the realism of TV, and their endorsement of Jezebel and Sapphire stereotypes. As expected, viewing of TV dramas that prominently feature Black women predicted notably greater support of the Jezebel stereotype among women and statistically greater support among men. Attributing greater realism to TV portrayals was associated with stronger support of the Sapphire stereotype among women. In Study 2, we exposed 438 Black and White emerging adults to depictions of the Sapphire stereotype and examined whether evaluations of women, Black women, and a Black woman job applicant varied by race or condition. Participants who had viewed Sapphire depictions perceived women, in general, to be less “feminine,” and White participants viewed Black women to be less warm. Our results offer support for multiple mechanisms and highlight implications for workplace and romantic relationships.","PeriodicalId":46730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Psychology-Theories Methods and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Psychology-Theories Methods and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Although African Americans are increasingly featured on TV, persistent stereotypes of Black women remain that frame them as hypersexual Jezebels or verbally aggressive Sapphires. Priming participants with these stereotypes negatively affects White emerging adults’ perceptions of Black women; however, parallel findings among Black participants have yet to emerge. We investigated this dynamic via two studies, testing mechanisms proposed by cultivation, social cognitive, and social identity theories. In Study 1, 204 Black emerging adults reported their exposure to 6 reality programs and 17 dramas that prominently feature Black women, their perceptions of the realism of TV, and their endorsement of Jezebel and Sapphire stereotypes. As expected, viewing of TV dramas that prominently feature Black women predicted notably greater support of the Jezebel stereotype among women and statistically greater support among men. Attributing greater realism to TV portrayals was associated with stronger support of the Sapphire stereotype among women. In Study 2, we exposed 438 Black and White emerging adults to depictions of the Sapphire stereotype and examined whether evaluations of women, Black women, and a Black woman job applicant varied by race or condition. Participants who had viewed Sapphire depictions perceived women, in general, to be less “feminine,” and White participants viewed Black women to be less warm. Our results offer support for multiple mechanisms and highlight implications for workplace and romantic relationships.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Media Psychology (JMP) is committed to publishing original, high-quality papers which cover the broad range of media psychological research. This peer-reviewed journal focuses on how human beings select, use, and experience various media as well as how media (use) can affect their cognitions, emotions, and behaviors. Submissions must substantially advance the current state-of the art on a theoretical and/or an empirical level. To name just a few typical fields and domains of inquiry, the Journal of Media Psychology considers manuscripts dealing with research on entertainment, computer-mediated communication (including social media), human-computer interaction, e-learning, computer and video games, virtual environments, or advertising. The journal is also open to research from neighboring disciplines as far as this work ties in with psychological concepts of the uses and effects of the media. Submissions of comparative work, e.g., crossmedia, cross-gender, or cross-cultural, are encouraged. Moreover, submissions including alternative analysis procedures such as the Bayesian approach are welcome. Starting in 2015, the pre-registration of research plans will also be possible. To ensure short turn-around cycles for manuscript review and fast publication, the Journal of Media Psychology relies heavily upon electronic communication and information exchange, starting from electronic submission and continuing throughout the entire review and production process.