Incidence of Missing Item Scores in Personality Measurement, and Simple Item-Score Imputation

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
J. V. van Ginkel, K. Sijtsma, L. A. van der Ark, J. Vermunt
{"title":"Incidence of Missing Item Scores in Personality Measurement, and Simple Item-Score Imputation","authors":"J. V. van Ginkel, K. Sijtsma, L. A. van der Ark, J. Vermunt","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/A000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this study was the incidence of different kinds of missing-data problems in personality research and the handling of these problems. Missing-data problems were reported in approximately half of more than 800 articles published in three leading personality journals. In these articles, unit nonresponse, attrition, and planned missingness were distinguished but missing item scores in trait measurement were reported most frequently. Listwise deletion was the most frequently used method for handling all missing-data problems. Listwise deletion is known to reduce the accuracy of parameter estimates and the power of statistical tests and often to produce biased statistical analysis results. This study proposes a simple alternative method for handling missing item scores, known as two-way imputation, which leaves the sample size intact and has been shown to produce almost unbiased results based on multi-item questionnaire data.","PeriodicalId":18476,"journal":{"name":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The focus of this study was the incidence of different kinds of missing-data problems in personality research and the handling of these problems. Missing-data problems were reported in approximately half of more than 800 articles published in three leading personality journals. In these articles, unit nonresponse, attrition, and planned missingness were distinguished but missing item scores in trait measurement were reported most frequently. Listwise deletion was the most frequently used method for handling all missing-data problems. Listwise deletion is known to reduce the accuracy of parameter estimates and the power of statistical tests and often to produce biased statistical analysis results. This study proposes a simple alternative method for handling missing item scores, known as two-way imputation, which leaves the sample size intact and has been shown to produce almost unbiased results based on multi-item questionnaire data.
人格测量中缺失项目得分的发生率及简单项目得分的归算
本研究的重点是人格研究中不同类型的数据缺失问题的发生率及其处理方法。在三个主要的人格杂志上发表的800多篇文章中,大约有一半报告了数据缺失问题。在这些文章中,单位无反应、损耗和计划缺失被区分出来,但缺失项目得分在特质测量中被报道得最多。列表删除是处理所有丢失数据问题最常用的方法。已知列表删除会降低参数估计的准确性和统计检验的能力,并经常产生有偏差的统计分析结果。本研究提出了一种简单的替代方法来处理缺失的项目得分,称为双向imputation,它使样本量保持不变,并已被证明可以产生基于多项目问卷数据的几乎无偏的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信