Multicollinearity and missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
A. Kelava, H. Moosbrugger, Polina Dimitruk, K. Schermelleh-engel
{"title":"Multicollinearity and missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects.","authors":"A. Kelava, H. Moosbrugger, Polina Dimitruk, K. Schermelleh-engel","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multicollinearity complicates the simultaneous estimation of interaction and quadratic effects in structural equation modeling (SEM). So far, approaches developed within the Kenny-Judd (1984) tradition have failed to specify additional and necessary constraints on the measurement error covariances of the nonlinear indicators. Given that the constraints comprise, in part, latent linear predictor correlations, multicollinearity poses a problem for such approaches. Klein and Moosbrugger’s (2000) latent moderated structural equations approach (LMS) approach does not utilize nonlinear indicators and should therefore not be affected by this problem. In the context of a simulation study, we varied predictor correlation and the number of nonlinear effects in order to compare the performance of three approaches developed for the estimation of simultaneous nonlinear effects: Ping’s (1996) two-step approach, a correctly extended Joreskog-Yang (1996) approach, and LMS. Results show that in contrast to the Joreskog-Ya...","PeriodicalId":18476,"journal":{"name":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for The Behavioral and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.51","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Multicollinearity complicates the simultaneous estimation of interaction and quadratic effects in structural equation modeling (SEM). So far, approaches developed within the Kenny-Judd (1984) tradition have failed to specify additional and necessary constraints on the measurement error covariances of the nonlinear indicators. Given that the constraints comprise, in part, latent linear predictor correlations, multicollinearity poses a problem for such approaches. Klein and Moosbrugger’s (2000) latent moderated structural equations approach (LMS) approach does not utilize nonlinear indicators and should therefore not be affected by this problem. In the context of a simulation study, we varied predictor correlation and the number of nonlinear effects in order to compare the performance of three approaches developed for the estimation of simultaneous nonlinear effects: Ping’s (1996) two-step approach, a correctly extended Joreskog-Yang (1996) approach, and LMS. Results show that in contrast to the Joreskog-Ya...
多重共线性与缺失约束:分析潜在非线性效应的三种方法的比较。
多重共线性使结构方程建模中相互作用和二次效应的同时估计变得复杂。到目前为止,在Kenny-Judd(1984)传统中开发的方法未能指定非线性指标的测量误差协方差的额外和必要的约束。考虑到约束部分包括潜在线性预测相关性,多重共线性给这种方法带来了问题。Klein和Moosbrugger(2000)的潜在调节结构方程方法(LMS)方法不使用非线性指标,因此不应该受到这个问题的影响。在模拟研究的背景下,我们改变了预测因子的相关性和非线性效应的数量,以便比较用于同时估计非线性效应的三种方法的性能:Ping(1996)的两步方法,正确扩展的Joreskog-Yang(1996)方法和LMS。结果表明,与Joreskog-Ya相比,…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信