Malay society in the late nineteenth century: the beginnings of change . By J. M. Gullick. (East Asian Historical Monographs.) pp. vii, 417. Singapore, Oxford University Press, 1987. £28.00.

I. Brown
{"title":"Malay society in the late nineteenth century: the beginnings of change . By J. M. Gullick. (East Asian Historical Monographs.) pp. vii, 417. Singapore, Oxford University Press, 1987. £28.00.","authors":"I. Brown","doi":"10.1017/S0035869X00108949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The disintegration of indigenous societies under the impact of colonial administration has long been a major theme in the historiography of modern Africa and Asia: the intervention of international commodity markets, the activities of Christian missions, the establishment of western education and the demotion (if not destruction) of indigenous political structures is each said to have profoundly undermined the stability and cohesiveness of the local community. The Malays of peninsular Malaya are commonly held to be an exception here; for in the opening decades of British administration (the period from the mid-1870s through to around 1910) Malay society, it is said, experienced only the most slow change, and thus preserved its essential character and institutions. It is this phenomenon which John Gullick seeks to explore and substantiate in this book. He does so by examining, chapter-by-chapter, various aspects of Malay society in the late nineteenth century-for example, the ruler in public life; the ruler in private life; the village community; the village economy; the Malay style of living; the maintenance of order; medicine and education; the organisation of Islam; sports, amusements and recreations. His examination is built upon the assembly of a truly vast body of contemporary comment and observations scattered through the official colonial records (annual reports, journals, council proceedings and papers, official correspondence, reports and memoranda) and the large number of books and articles published by officials and other Europeans resident in the Malaya of this period and by contemporary visitors. His approach, in essence, is to allow this material, very skilfully organised, to speak for itself. The result is a richly detailed and informative study: it is a delight to read. In only one respect does it seriously disappoint: and that is that the final discussion is too brief (it extends over less than five pages) to allow for an adequate concluding consideration of the book's central concern the comparative stability of Malay society in this period. It is tempting to see this issue as primarily a political question, for it was the firm policy of the colonial administration to secure the position of the Malay sultans in the eyes of the Malay population (on ceremonial and other public occasions, British officials treated the sultans with full deference) and to avoid intervention in matters of Malay custom and religion. And yet the experience of other parts of the colonial world suggests that a close accommodation between indigenous rulers and their colonial overlords would undermine the traditional authority of the former. Why did the collaboration of the Malay ruling elite with British power (the word is employed simply as a description, and carries no pejorative implications) not destroy the structure of indigenous authority? Perhaps the comparative stability of Malay society under British administration should therefore be seen as primarily an economic question, for as John Gullick points out, the Malays were not drawn into the rapid commercial development which took hold in the peninsula in the opening decades of British rule: and it might be added that when, in the early years of the twentieth century, the Malays did enter the export economy, they did so in such a way, as smallholder producers of rubber, as to cause only a modest disturbance to the long-established patterns of rural economy and society. Perhaps this is also an ethnic issue: here the argument might be that the large-scale immigration of the commerciallyaggressive Indians and Chinese, in threatening (numerically and economically) the Malays, acted to strengthen the cohesiveness of Malay society. These are, of course, among the central issues which must concern the historian of British Malaya. In this finely-written and exhaustively-researched book John Gullick has provided in abundance the material with which they can be confronted.","PeriodicalId":81727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland","volume":"11 1","pages":"419 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0035869X00108949","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00108949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The disintegration of indigenous societies under the impact of colonial administration has long been a major theme in the historiography of modern Africa and Asia: the intervention of international commodity markets, the activities of Christian missions, the establishment of western education and the demotion (if not destruction) of indigenous political structures is each said to have profoundly undermined the stability and cohesiveness of the local community. The Malays of peninsular Malaya are commonly held to be an exception here; for in the opening decades of British administration (the period from the mid-1870s through to around 1910) Malay society, it is said, experienced only the most slow change, and thus preserved its essential character and institutions. It is this phenomenon which John Gullick seeks to explore and substantiate in this book. He does so by examining, chapter-by-chapter, various aspects of Malay society in the late nineteenth century-for example, the ruler in public life; the ruler in private life; the village community; the village economy; the Malay style of living; the maintenance of order; medicine and education; the organisation of Islam; sports, amusements and recreations. His examination is built upon the assembly of a truly vast body of contemporary comment and observations scattered through the official colonial records (annual reports, journals, council proceedings and papers, official correspondence, reports and memoranda) and the large number of books and articles published by officials and other Europeans resident in the Malaya of this period and by contemporary visitors. His approach, in essence, is to allow this material, very skilfully organised, to speak for itself. The result is a richly detailed and informative study: it is a delight to read. In only one respect does it seriously disappoint: and that is that the final discussion is too brief (it extends over less than five pages) to allow for an adequate concluding consideration of the book's central concern the comparative stability of Malay society in this period. It is tempting to see this issue as primarily a political question, for it was the firm policy of the colonial administration to secure the position of the Malay sultans in the eyes of the Malay population (on ceremonial and other public occasions, British officials treated the sultans with full deference) and to avoid intervention in matters of Malay custom and religion. And yet the experience of other parts of the colonial world suggests that a close accommodation between indigenous rulers and their colonial overlords would undermine the traditional authority of the former. Why did the collaboration of the Malay ruling elite with British power (the word is employed simply as a description, and carries no pejorative implications) not destroy the structure of indigenous authority? Perhaps the comparative stability of Malay society under British administration should therefore be seen as primarily an economic question, for as John Gullick points out, the Malays were not drawn into the rapid commercial development which took hold in the peninsula in the opening decades of British rule: and it might be added that when, in the early years of the twentieth century, the Malays did enter the export economy, they did so in such a way, as smallholder producers of rubber, as to cause only a modest disturbance to the long-established patterns of rural economy and society. Perhaps this is also an ethnic issue: here the argument might be that the large-scale immigration of the commerciallyaggressive Indians and Chinese, in threatening (numerically and economically) the Malays, acted to strengthen the cohesiveness of Malay society. These are, of course, among the central issues which must concern the historian of British Malaya. In this finely-written and exhaustively-researched book John Gullick has provided in abundance the material with which they can be confronted.
十九世纪末的马来社会:变革的开端。作者:J.M.Gullick。(《东亚历史专著》)第vii、417页。新加坡,牛津大学出版社,1987年。28.00英镑。
在殖民统治的影响下,土著社会的解体长期以来一直是现代非洲和亚洲史学的一个主要主题:国际商品市场的干预、基督教传教的活动、西方教育的建立以及土著政治结构的降级(如果不是破坏的话)都被认为深刻地破坏了当地社区的稳定和凝聚力。马来亚半岛的马来人通常被认为是这里的一个例外;因为在英国统治的最初几十年(从19世纪70年代中期到1910年左右),据说马来社会只经历了最缓慢的变化,因此保留了其基本特征和制度。这正是约翰·古力克在这本书中试图探索和证实的现象。为了做到这一点,他一章一章地考察了十九世纪晚期马来社会的各个方面——例如,公共生活中的统治者;私人生活中的统治者;乡村社区;农村经济;马来人的生活方式;秩序的维持;医学和教育;伊斯兰教组织;运动、娱乐和娱乐。他的研究是建立在一个真正庞大的当代评论和观察的集合之上的,这些评论和观察分散在官方殖民记录(年度报告、期刊、理事会会议记录和论文、官方信件、报告和备忘录)以及这一时期马来亚官员和其他欧洲居民以及当代游客出版的大量书籍和文章中。从本质上讲,他的方法是让这些材料,非常巧妙地组织起来,为自己说话。这是一份内容丰富、内容丰富的研究报告,读起来令人愉悦。只有一个方面让人非常失望:那就是最后的讨论过于简短(不到五页),以至于无法对本书的中心关注点——这一时期马来社会的相对稳定——进行充分的总结。人们很容易把这个问题看作一个主要的政治问题,因为殖民政府的坚定政策是确保马来苏丹在马来人民眼中的地位(在仪式和其他公共场合,英国官员对苏丹完全尊重),并避免干预马来习俗和宗教事务。然而,殖民世界其他地区的经验表明,土著统治者与殖民统治者之间的密切配合将破坏前者的传统权威。为什么马来统治精英与英国权力(这个词只是一种描述,没有任何贬义)的合作没有摧毁本土权威的结构?因此,也许马来人社会在英国统治下的相对稳定应该主要被视为一个经济问题,因为正如约翰·古力克指出的那样,马来人并没有被吸引到英国统治初期在半岛上迅速发展的商业发展中。还可以补充说,在二十世纪初,马来人确实进入了出口经济,他们是作为橡胶的小农生产者这样做的,对长期建立的农村经济和社会模式只造成了轻微的干扰。也许这也是一个种族问题:这里的论点可能是,商业上咄咄逼人的印度人和中国人的大规模移民,在威胁(数量和经济)马来人的同时,起到了加强马来社会凝聚力的作用。当然,这些都是英属马来亚历史学家必须关注的核心问题。在这本文笔精致、研究详尽的书中,约翰·古力克提供了大量的材料来应对这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信