Effect of oxygen and growth medium on in vitro biofilm formation by Escherichia coli

Biofilms Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S1479050507002074
L. A. Bjergbæk, J. Haagensen, A. Reisner, S. Molin, P. Roslev
{"title":"Effect of oxygen and growth medium on in vitro biofilm formation by Escherichia coli","authors":"L. A. Bjergbæk, J. Haagensen, A. Reisner, S. Molin, P. Roslev","doi":"10.1017/S1479050507002074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of oxygen availability on in vitro biofilm formation by an Escherichia coli K-12 strain and 13 clinical E. coli strains were compared. All E. coli strains were capable of forming monospecies biofilm on polystyrene in aerobic media. The K-12 strain produced biofilm in both aerobic glucose minimal medium (ABTG), and aerobic trypticase soy broth (TSB) whereas the majority of the clinical strains produced significant biofilm only in aerobic TSB (9 of 13). In anaerobic media, E. coli K-12 and 9 of the 13 clinical strains were capable of forming biofilm in vitro . Only three clinical strains formed biofilm in anaerobic TSB whereas six clinical strains produced detectable biofilm in anaerobic ABTG. None of the strains tested were capable of forming biofilm in both anaerobic ABTG and anaerobic TSB. Strains that were good biofilm formers in aerobic ABTG also produced the highest amount of biofilm in anaerobic ABTG ( R 2 = 0.90). Image analysis revealed notable differences in architecture for biofilms grown in the presence and in the absence of oxygen. In aerobic ABTG, the biofilm was dominated by tall, mushroom-shaped microcolonies with pores and channels whereas biofilm in anaerobic ABTG was thinner and less heterogeneous, resulting in reduced maximum thickness and biovolume. Analysis of phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles from E. coli K-12 and three clinical strains did not reveal a specific pattern associated with the biofilm phenotypes. Interestingly, the clinical E. coli strains adjusted their PLFA composition much more than did E. coli K-12 in response to changes in growth regimens. Collectively, the results indicate that oxygen availability may affect E. coli biofilm formation in minimal and complex media. The results confirm that E. coli K-12 and some clinical E. coli strains are capable of forming in vitro biofilm under anaerobic conditions. However, the data also suggest that this attribute is highly strain dependent and may vary significantly among clinical isolates.","PeriodicalId":87392,"journal":{"name":"Biofilms","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1479050507002074","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479050507002074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The effects of oxygen availability on in vitro biofilm formation by an Escherichia coli K-12 strain and 13 clinical E. coli strains were compared. All E. coli strains were capable of forming monospecies biofilm on polystyrene in aerobic media. The K-12 strain produced biofilm in both aerobic glucose minimal medium (ABTG), and aerobic trypticase soy broth (TSB) whereas the majority of the clinical strains produced significant biofilm only in aerobic TSB (9 of 13). In anaerobic media, E. coli K-12 and 9 of the 13 clinical strains were capable of forming biofilm in vitro . Only three clinical strains formed biofilm in anaerobic TSB whereas six clinical strains produced detectable biofilm in anaerobic ABTG. None of the strains tested were capable of forming biofilm in both anaerobic ABTG and anaerobic TSB. Strains that were good biofilm formers in aerobic ABTG also produced the highest amount of biofilm in anaerobic ABTG ( R 2 = 0.90). Image analysis revealed notable differences in architecture for biofilms grown in the presence and in the absence of oxygen. In aerobic ABTG, the biofilm was dominated by tall, mushroom-shaped microcolonies with pores and channels whereas biofilm in anaerobic ABTG was thinner and less heterogeneous, resulting in reduced maximum thickness and biovolume. Analysis of phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles from E. coli K-12 and three clinical strains did not reveal a specific pattern associated with the biofilm phenotypes. Interestingly, the clinical E. coli strains adjusted their PLFA composition much more than did E. coli K-12 in response to changes in growth regimens. Collectively, the results indicate that oxygen availability may affect E. coli biofilm formation in minimal and complex media. The results confirm that E. coli K-12 and some clinical E. coli strains are capable of forming in vitro biofilm under anaerobic conditions. However, the data also suggest that this attribute is highly strain dependent and may vary significantly among clinical isolates.
氧和培养基对大肠杆菌体外生物膜形成的影响
比较了氧可用性对大肠杆菌K-12菌株和13株临床大肠杆菌体外生物膜形成的影响。所有大肠杆菌菌株都能在好氧介质聚苯乙烯上形成单种生物膜。K-12菌株在好氧葡萄糖培养基(ABTG)和好氧胰蛋白酶豆汤(TSB)中均产生生物膜,而大多数临床菌株仅在好氧TSB中产生显著的生物膜(13株中的9株)。在厌氧培养基中,大肠杆菌K-12和13株临床菌株中的9株能够在体外形成生物膜。只有3株临床菌株在厌氧TSB中形成生物膜,而6株临床菌株在厌氧ABTG中产生可检测的生物膜。试验菌株在厌氧ABTG和厌氧TSB中均不能形成生物膜。在好氧ABTG中形成良好生物膜的菌株在厌氧ABTG中产生的生物膜量也最高(r2 = 0.90)。图像分析揭示了在有氧和无氧条件下生长的生物膜在结构上的显著差异。在好氧ABTG中,生物膜以高大的蘑菇状微菌落为主,具有孔隙和通道,而在厌氧ABTG中,生物膜较薄且不均匀,导致最大厚度和生物体积减小。对大肠杆菌K-12和三种临床菌株的磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)谱的分析没有发现与生物膜表型相关的特定模式。有趣的是,临床大肠杆菌菌株比大肠杆菌K-12菌株更能根据生长方案的变化调整其PLFA组成。总的来说,结果表明氧的可用性可能影响大肠杆菌生物膜的形成在最小和复杂的介质。结果证实,大肠杆菌K-12和一些临床大肠杆菌菌株能够在厌氧条件下形成体外生物膜。然而,数据也表明,这一属性高度依赖于菌株,并且在临床分离株之间可能存在显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信