FETAL AND MATERNAL CONSEQUENCES OF PREGNANCIES CONCEIVED USING ART

C. Aiken, J. Brockelsby
{"title":"FETAL AND MATERNAL CONSEQUENCES OF PREGNANCIES CONCEIVED USING ART","authors":"C. Aiken, J. Brockelsby","doi":"10.1017/S096553951600005X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial reproductive technology (ART) was first introduced to clinical practice in the late 1970s 1 and has subsequently resulted in approximately 5 million births worldwide 2 . Globally, the rates of assisted conceptions continue to rise 3 . In 2011, approximately 1.5% of all pregnancies in the US were conceived using ART 4 . Since its introduction, much interest has been generated regarding the effects of ART on the developing fetus and potential adverse impacts on the health of the mother. In particular, early studies suggested an increase in fetal genetic and structural anomalies, and a high risk of perinatal complications. As experience with pregnancies conceived using ART has increased worldwide and more data regarding the outcomes of ART-conceived pregnancies have been reported, many of the initial worries have been shown to be unfounded. However, concern still exists regarding whether any adverse fetal and maternal outcomes result from the use of this technology. Many studies have reported higher risks of fetal complications following the use of ART including an increase in perinatal mortality, even in singleton pregnancies 5,6 . However, interpretation of these data are far from simple and it is important to consider that observations of higher rates of complications do not equate to a causal relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and the use of ART 7 . There are multiple confounding factors that may account for these associations, many of which are difficult to control for in large-scale studies.","PeriodicalId":89369,"journal":{"name":"Fetal and maternal medicine review","volume":"25 1","pages":"281-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S096553951600005X","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal and maternal medicine review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S096553951600005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Artificial reproductive technology (ART) was first introduced to clinical practice in the late 1970s 1 and has subsequently resulted in approximately 5 million births worldwide 2 . Globally, the rates of assisted conceptions continue to rise 3 . In 2011, approximately 1.5% of all pregnancies in the US were conceived using ART 4 . Since its introduction, much interest has been generated regarding the effects of ART on the developing fetus and potential adverse impacts on the health of the mother. In particular, early studies suggested an increase in fetal genetic and structural anomalies, and a high risk of perinatal complications. As experience with pregnancies conceived using ART has increased worldwide and more data regarding the outcomes of ART-conceived pregnancies have been reported, many of the initial worries have been shown to be unfounded. However, concern still exists regarding whether any adverse fetal and maternal outcomes result from the use of this technology. Many studies have reported higher risks of fetal complications following the use of ART including an increase in perinatal mortality, even in singleton pregnancies 5,6 . However, interpretation of these data are far from simple and it is important to consider that observations of higher rates of complications do not equate to a causal relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and the use of ART 7 . There are multiple confounding factors that may account for these associations, many of which are difficult to control for in large-scale studies.
使用人工受孕对胎儿和母亲的影响
人工生殖技术(ART)于20世纪70年代末首次被引入临床实践1,随后在全球范围内导致约500万新生儿2。在全球范围内,辅助受孕率继续上升。2011年,美国约1.5%的孕妇使用ART 4。自引进以来,人们对抗逆转录病毒治疗对发育中的胎儿的影响以及对母亲健康的潜在不利影响产生了极大的兴趣。特别是,早期研究表明胎儿遗传和结构异常增加,围产期并发症风险高。随着世界范围内使用抗逆转录病毒治疗怀孕的经验的增加以及关于抗逆转录病毒治疗怀孕结果的更多数据的报告,许多最初的担忧已被证明是没有根据的。然而,关于使用该技术是否会导致胎儿和母亲的不良后果,仍然存在关注。许多研究报告说,使用抗逆转录病毒治疗后胎儿并发症的风险更高,包括围产期死亡率增加,即使是单胎妊娠也是如此。然而,对这些数据的解释远非简单,重要的是要考虑到,观察到并发症发生率较高并不等同于不良妊娠结局与ART 7的使用之间存在因果关系。有多种混杂因素可以解释这些关联,其中许多在大规模研究中难以控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信