Catullus’ Priapean Poem (c. 17)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ann.2021.10
Lindsay C. Watson
{"title":"Catullus’ Priapean Poem (c. 17)","authors":"Lindsay C. Watson","doi":"10.1017/ann.2021.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Catullus 17 poses a host of interpretational difficulties. The thorniest of these concerns its unity. How can the initial lines on the rickety state of Colonia's ponticulus be reconciled with the real focus of the poem, the precipitation from the bridge of a husband who is blind to his bride's erotic needs, in the hope of bringing him to his senses? Many attempts have been made to resolve the problem, but few persuade to any degree. This paper proposes that the key to the unity-question lies in Catullus’ adoption of the rare priapean metre. This manoeuvre expresses itself in two ways: first, by infusing the poem as a whole with the thematic colours ascribed to priapeans by ancient metricians, that is to say a ludic, countrified but also mock-epic ethos: second, and crucially, by constructing the doltish maritus, the thematic locus of the poem, as an alter ego of the eponymous deity of Priapean literature; for just like the god of that corpus, the husband of the poem is a conspicuous sexual under-achiever, the butt of mocking laughter, inurbane, and little more than an insensate block of wood. In sum, by reading c. 17 through a specifically Priapean lens it is possible to discover in it an otherwise elusive unity.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"55 1","pages":"35 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2021.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Catullus 17 poses a host of interpretational difficulties. The thorniest of these concerns its unity. How can the initial lines on the rickety state of Colonia's ponticulus be reconciled with the real focus of the poem, the precipitation from the bridge of a husband who is blind to his bride's erotic needs, in the hope of bringing him to his senses? Many attempts have been made to resolve the problem, but few persuade to any degree. This paper proposes that the key to the unity-question lies in Catullus’ adoption of the rare priapean metre. This manoeuvre expresses itself in two ways: first, by infusing the poem as a whole with the thematic colours ascribed to priapeans by ancient metricians, that is to say a ludic, countrified but also mock-epic ethos: second, and crucially, by constructing the doltish maritus, the thematic locus of the poem, as an alter ego of the eponymous deity of Priapean literature; for just like the god of that corpus, the husband of the poem is a conspicuous sexual under-achiever, the butt of mocking laughter, inurbane, and little more than an insensate block of wood. In sum, by reading c. 17 through a specifically Priapean lens it is possible to discover in it an otherwise elusive unity.
卡图卢斯的Priapean诗(约17年)
Catullus 17提出了一系列的解释困难。其中最棘手的问题是它的团结。关于科洛尼亚桥的摇摇欲坠的开头几行怎么能和诗的真正重点协调起来呢,一个丈夫在桥上对新娘的情欲需求视而不见,希望能让他恢复理智?为解决这个问题已作了许多尝试,但很少有人能说服他。本文提出,统一问题的关键在于卡图卢斯采用了罕见的普里阿庇米。这种手法有两种表现方式:第一,给整首诗注入了古代韵律学家赋予普里亚庇人的主题色彩,也就是说,一种滑稽的,乡村化的,但也嘲弄史诗的气质;第二,也是最重要的,通过构建愚蠢的玛丽特斯,诗歌的主题中心,作为普里亚庇文学中同名神的另一个自我;因为就像那首诗的神一样,这首诗的丈夫是一个引人注目的性方面的失败者,嘲笑的对象,粗鲁,只不过是一块麻木的木头。总之,从普里阿庇特人的角度来解读《c. 17》,就有可能在其中发现一种难以捉摸的统一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信