An Aureus of Pompeius Magnus*

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.1017/ANN.2016.8
Bruce D. Marshall
{"title":"An Aureus of Pompeius Magnus*","authors":"Bruce D. Marshall","doi":"10.1017/ANN.2016.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a recent article in this journal, Kathryn Welch and Hannah Mitchell examined a much debated question: to what extent did Roman commanders, and in particular Pompeius, model themselves on Alexander the Great? 1 The opposing views on this question are best encapsulated by Peter Green on the one side, and Erich Gruen on the other. 2 One piece of evidence used in this continuing debate is an aureus of Pompeius, but there are two disputes related to it: the date of its issue and the iconography of its obverse. Unfortunately, due to a lack of specific evidence the discussion trying to resolve these disputes often ends without a clear conclusion, and we are left with speculation and conjecture. The reverse of the aureus shows a triumph, and the nub of the question about dating the coin is which triumph does it depict. The argument here is that the coin depicts Pompeius’ third triumph in 61 BC, when he celebrated his extensive conquests in the East. That date will help the argument that the personification on the obverse has Alexander overtones, as some scholars suggest. If that can be established, it will give some idea of Pompeius’ intentions in minting the coin: Pompeius was not only channelling Alexander, but also trying to imply that he had surpassed the Macedonian king’s achievements.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"50 1","pages":"107 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ANN.2016.8","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ANN.2016.8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract In a recent article in this journal, Kathryn Welch and Hannah Mitchell examined a much debated question: to what extent did Roman commanders, and in particular Pompeius, model themselves on Alexander the Great? 1 The opposing views on this question are best encapsulated by Peter Green on the one side, and Erich Gruen on the other. 2 One piece of evidence used in this continuing debate is an aureus of Pompeius, but there are two disputes related to it: the date of its issue and the iconography of its obverse. Unfortunately, due to a lack of specific evidence the discussion trying to resolve these disputes often ends without a clear conclusion, and we are left with speculation and conjecture. The reverse of the aureus shows a triumph, and the nub of the question about dating the coin is which triumph does it depict. The argument here is that the coin depicts Pompeius’ third triumph in 61 BC, when he celebrated his extensive conquests in the East. That date will help the argument that the personification on the obverse has Alexander overtones, as some scholars suggest. If that can be established, it will give some idea of Pompeius’ intentions in minting the coin: Pompeius was not only channelling Alexander, but also trying to imply that he had surpassed the Macedonian king’s achievements.
庞贝大帝的Aureus*
在本刊最近发表的一篇文章中,凯瑟琳·韦尔奇和汉娜·米切尔研究了一个备受争议的问题:罗马指挥官,尤其是庞培,在多大程度上以亚历山大大帝为榜样?彼得·格林(Peter Green)和埃里希·格伦(Erich Gruen)对这个问题的对立观点作了最好的概括。在这场持续不断的辩论中,一个证据是庞培的金饰,但有两个争议与之相关:它的发行日期和它正面的图像。不幸的是,由于缺乏具体的证据,试图解决这些争议的讨论往往没有一个明确的结论,我们只剩下猜测和猜想。金灿灿的背面显示了一场胜利,而关于这枚硬币的年代问题的关键在于它描绘的是哪一场胜利。这里的论点是,这枚硬币描绘了庞培在公元前61年的第三次胜利,当时他庆祝了他在东方的大规模征服。正如一些学者所言,这个日期将有助于正面的人格化具有亚历山大色彩的论点。如果这一说法能够成立,就能让我们对庞培铸造硬币的意图有所了解:庞培不仅是在引导亚历山大,而且还试图暗示他已经超越了马其顿国王的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信