Maxentius, the Dioscuri, and the Legitimisation of Imperial Power

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ann.2018.2
Gwynaeth McIntyre
{"title":"Maxentius, the Dioscuri, and the Legitimisation of Imperial Power","authors":"Gwynaeth McIntyre","doi":"10.1017/ann.2018.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Mythological twin brothers played key roles in the establishment and preservation of the city of Rome. This article examines the use of one particular set of brothers, Castor and Pollux, by rival forms of government in the early fourth century ce. In his work on the representations of the Dioscuri on Roman coinage, Gricourt argues that the Dioscuri symbolise the same ideas on Maxentius’ coins as on other such imperial coinage, namely their role in maintaining the eternal order of the universe and their roles as protectors of soldiers. 1 More recently, however, Marlowe and Hekster have successfully argued that Maxentius’ ideology was a counterclaim to that presented by the Tetrarchy. 2 Developing this notion further with respect to Maxentius’ coinage, this article argues that, for the Tetrarchs, Castor and Pollux served as the ideal figures to symbolise the importance of concordia in the collective rule of like-minded individuals. Maxentius, however, used Castor and Pollux in connection with other symbols of the city of Rome (such as Romulus, Remus, and the she-wolf) on his coins to promote his restoration of the city of Rome (in conjunction with titles such as princeps and conservator urbis suae). The examination of this ideological conflict between Maxentius and the Tetrarchy, through their use of Castor and Pollux on their coinage, sheds light on the mutability of myth and its role in the promotion of particular aspects of mythological narratives and figures to support an individual’s own claims to power.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"52 1","pages":"161 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2018.2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2018.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Mythological twin brothers played key roles in the establishment and preservation of the city of Rome. This article examines the use of one particular set of brothers, Castor and Pollux, by rival forms of government in the early fourth century ce. In his work on the representations of the Dioscuri on Roman coinage, Gricourt argues that the Dioscuri symbolise the same ideas on Maxentius’ coins as on other such imperial coinage, namely their role in maintaining the eternal order of the universe and their roles as protectors of soldiers. 1 More recently, however, Marlowe and Hekster have successfully argued that Maxentius’ ideology was a counterclaim to that presented by the Tetrarchy. 2 Developing this notion further with respect to Maxentius’ coinage, this article argues that, for the Tetrarchs, Castor and Pollux served as the ideal figures to symbolise the importance of concordia in the collective rule of like-minded individuals. Maxentius, however, used Castor and Pollux in connection with other symbols of the city of Rome (such as Romulus, Remus, and the she-wolf) on his coins to promote his restoration of the city of Rome (in conjunction with titles such as princeps and conservator urbis suae). The examination of this ideological conflict between Maxentius and the Tetrarchy, through their use of Castor and Pollux on their coinage, sheds light on the mutability of myth and its role in the promotion of particular aspects of mythological narratives and figures to support an individual’s own claims to power.
马克森提乌斯,迪奥斯库里,以及皇权的合法化
神话中的孪生兄弟在罗马城的建立和保存中发挥了关键作用。这篇文章考察了在公元四世纪早期,两种不同形式的政府对一对特殊的兄弟——卡斯特和波鲁克斯的使用。在他关于罗马铸币上迪奥斯库里雕像的作品中,格里库尔认为,迪奥斯库里雕像象征着与马克森提乌斯硬币上的其他帝国铸币相同的思想,即他们在维持宇宙永恒秩序和保护士兵方面的作用。1然而,最近,马洛和海克斯特成功地论证了马克森提乌斯的意识形态是对四帝制所提出的意识形态的反证。2根据马克森提乌斯的铸币,这篇文章进一步发展了这一观点,认为对于四帝制来说,卡斯特和波鲁克斯是理想的人物,象征着在志同道合的个人的集体统治中和谐的重要性。马克森提乌斯,然而,用双子星座与罗马城市的其他符号(如罗穆卢斯,Remus,母狼)在他的硬币推广他的恢复罗马(与标题如最初的和枕urbi suae)。对马森提乌斯和四帝统治之间的意识形态冲突的考察,通过他们在硬币上使用卡斯特和波鲁克斯,揭示了神话的可变性及其在促进神话叙事和人物的特定方面的作用,以支持个人对权力的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信