Introduction: A Brief History of Antichthon to Mark its 50th Anniversary

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Antichthon Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.1017/ann.2016.1
B. A. Marshall
{"title":"Introduction: A Brief History of Antichthon to Mark its 50th Anniversary","authors":"B. A. Marshall","doi":"10.1017/ann.2016.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the first half of the 1960s there were several groups putting forward proposals to establish a wider-based, academic organisation to promote Classics and Ancient World Studies. There had been in existence for many years state Classical Associations, based on the model of, and affiliated to, the U.K. Classical Association, but these were, and still are, comprised of a different range of members – academics, schoolteachers, and interested persons from the general public – and, being located primarily in the state capital cities, they had a local orientation. What the new groups were looking for was a more ‘professional’ organisation which would be attractive to academics, and in particular they focussed on the desire to set up a national academic journal to promote their disciplines of Classics and Ancient World Studies. To some extent university Classics staff had been offered support from a body called AULLA (‘Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association’), which had been formed in 1957 and which, as its name implied, covered both Australia and New Zealand. AULLA met in Congress every 18 months to two years in either Australia or New Zealand. The Congresses regularly had a Classics Section, with a local convenor who arranged for the giving of papers by university staff offering them. AULLA also published a journal, AUMLA, which arose out of the Australasian Universities Modern Languages Association (the forerunner of AULLA); the name implies its orientation, and the journal was not seen as an entirely congenial location for articles on Greek and Roman topics, though such did appear from time to time. Ancient Historians had been partially catered for by the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science (ANZAAS). It was a more powerful organisation – it did have the word ‘Science’ in it, after all – because it had the ear of government. It met in Congress every year or so at a host university; occasionally there would be a section for Archaeology (mainly Australian) or for Ancient World Studies, but it would depend on someone from the host university taking on the role of organising such a section. There was no publication to which staff in universities could submit articles, though abstracts of papers presented at ANZAAS Congresses could be collectively published afterwards. One of the groups which met in the 1960s to create a new organisation was convened on the initiative of the enthusiastic but eccentric Godfrey Tanner, from Classics in the (then) University College of Newcastle. Under his guidance an organisation called ‘The N.S.W and A.C.T. Joint Committee’","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"50 1","pages":"i - vii"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ann.2016.1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ann.2016.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the first half of the 1960s there were several groups putting forward proposals to establish a wider-based, academic organisation to promote Classics and Ancient World Studies. There had been in existence for many years state Classical Associations, based on the model of, and affiliated to, the U.K. Classical Association, but these were, and still are, comprised of a different range of members – academics, schoolteachers, and interested persons from the general public – and, being located primarily in the state capital cities, they had a local orientation. What the new groups were looking for was a more ‘professional’ organisation which would be attractive to academics, and in particular they focussed on the desire to set up a national academic journal to promote their disciplines of Classics and Ancient World Studies. To some extent university Classics staff had been offered support from a body called AULLA (‘Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association’), which had been formed in 1957 and which, as its name implied, covered both Australia and New Zealand. AULLA met in Congress every 18 months to two years in either Australia or New Zealand. The Congresses regularly had a Classics Section, with a local convenor who arranged for the giving of papers by university staff offering them. AULLA also published a journal, AUMLA, which arose out of the Australasian Universities Modern Languages Association (the forerunner of AULLA); the name implies its orientation, and the journal was not seen as an entirely congenial location for articles on Greek and Roman topics, though such did appear from time to time. Ancient Historians had been partially catered for by the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science (ANZAAS). It was a more powerful organisation – it did have the word ‘Science’ in it, after all – because it had the ear of government. It met in Congress every year or so at a host university; occasionally there would be a section for Archaeology (mainly Australian) or for Ancient World Studies, but it would depend on someone from the host university taking on the role of organising such a section. There was no publication to which staff in universities could submit articles, though abstracts of papers presented at ANZAAS Congresses could be collectively published afterwards. One of the groups which met in the 1960s to create a new organisation was convened on the initiative of the enthusiastic but eccentric Godfrey Tanner, from Classics in the (then) University College of Newcastle. Under his guidance an organisation called ‘The N.S.W and A.C.T. Joint Committee’
引言:纪念安提克顿50周年的简史
在20世纪60年代上半叶,有几个团体提出了建立一个基础更广泛的学术组织来促进经典和古代世界研究的建议。州古典协会已经存在多年,以英国古典协会的模式为基础,并隶属于英国古典协会,但这些协会过去是,现在仍然是由不同范围的成员组成的——学者、教师和普通公众感兴趣的人——而且,它们主要位于州首府城市,有地方定位。这些新组织所寻找的是一个对学者更有吸引力的更“专业”的组织,他们特别关注于建立一个全国性的学术期刊,以推广他们的经典和古代世界研究学科。在某种程度上,大学的古典文学教职员工得到了一个名为AULLA(澳大拉西亚大学语言文学协会)的组织的支持,该组织成立于1957年,顾名思义,涵盖澳大利亚和新西兰。AULLA每隔18个月至两年在澳大利亚或新西兰召开一次国会会议。大会定期有一个经典部分,由当地的召集人安排由大学工作人员提供论文。澳大拉西亚大学现代语言协会(澳大拉西亚大学现代语言协会的前身)还出版了一份期刊《澳大拉西亚大学现代语言协会》;这个名字暗示了它的方向,而且这本杂志并不被认为是一个完全适合发表希腊和罗马主题文章的地方,尽管这样的文章偶尔会出现。澳大利亚和新西兰科学促进会(ANZAAS)为古代历史学家提供了部分服务。它是一个更强大的组织——毕竟它确实有“科学”这个词——因为它有政府的耳朵。它大约每年在一所主办大学的国会召开一次会议;偶尔会有考古学(主要是澳大利亚人)或古代世界研究的部分,但这取决于来自主办大学的人承担组织这样一个部分的角色。大学的工作人员没有出版物可以向其提交文章,但在澳新教协大会上发表的论文摘要可以在会后集体发表。20世纪60年代,在热情但古怪的戈弗雷·坦纳(Godfrey Tanner)的倡议下,一个小组成立了一个新组织,他来自(当时的)纽卡斯尔大学学院的古典文学专业。在他的指导下,成立了一个名为“新社联和A.C.T.联合委员会”的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信