MORAL GRANDSTANDING AS A THREAT TO FREE EXPRESSION

IF 0.3 4区哲学 Q4 ETHICS

Social Philosophy & Policy Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0265052521000108

Justin Tosi, Brandon Warmke

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Moral grandstanding, or the use of moral talk for self-promotion, is a threat to free expression. When grandstanding is introduced in a public forum, several ideals of free expression are less likely to be realized. Popular views are less likely to be challenged, people are less free to entertain heterodox ideas, and the cost of changing one’s mind goes up.

查看原文本刊更多论文

道德上的哗众取宠是对言论自由的威胁

道德上的哗众取宠，或利用道德言论进行自我推销，是对言论自由的威胁。当哗众取宠在公共论坛上出现时，一些自由表达的理想就不太可能实现了。流行的观点不太可能受到挑战，人们接受非正统观点的自由更少，改变想法的成本也会上升。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Philosophy & Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Philosophy and Policy is an interdisciplinary journal with an emphasis on the philosophical underpinnings of enduring social policy debates. The issues are thematic in format, examining a specific area of concern with contributions from scholars in different disciplines, especially philosophy, economics, political science and law. While not primarily a journal of policy prescriptions, some articles in each issue will typically connect theory with practice. The 2006 issues are "Justice and Global Politics" and "Taxation, Economic Prosperity, and Distributive Justice". The 2007 issues will be "Liberalism: Old and New" and "Ancient Greek Political Theory".