Library-To-Library and Librarian-Academic Partnerships: The University of Malawi, The University of Nigeria, Nsukka, and Michigan State University

P. Limb
{"title":"Library-To-Library and Librarian-Academic Partnerships: The University of Malawi, The University of Nigeria, Nsukka, and Michigan State University","authors":"P. Limb","doi":"10.1017/s0305862x00021087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction University partnerships are a growing focus of African Studies programmes,2 often underpinning much project rhetoric. Yet, the vagaries of funding and administration can render projects ineffective or less effective, projects that in any case often neglect libraries. This can be a fatal flaw in project planning because libraries in the North tend to form one of the, if not the, major nerve centres of a university; never more so than today, when the physical library 'neurons' now comprise not just books and journals but a mass of hardware and software. Some administrators make the mistake of imagining 'the library' only in terms of bricks and mortar, and neglect the crucial role of libraries and librarians in identifying, acquiring, classifying and making accessible a wide range of important information resources and related services. In most African countries, neglect of libraries due to limited resources and sometimes policy has had a baneful impact. Therefore, university development projects or partnerships on Africa that neglect libraries and information services do so at their own peril. The case study experiences that I briefly outline below suggest that closer attention to the detail of partnerships and the building of new alliances, not just between librarians in the North and in Africa, but also between academics and librarians in our respective universities can help to improve the effectiveness of African partnerships. Problems of limited resources and administrative decisions can still limit their effectiveness, but such projects can offer a potentially useful way to help render disinterested assistance to libraries in Africa whilst at the same time improving the knowledge and understanding of African libraries by both librarians and academics in the North. Over the years, there have been some very useful, largely ad hoc contacts with, or assistance to, African libraries and archives. To give just three examples: by the British Library's Endangered Archives Programme, by Nordic material aid in Lusaka and Dar es Salaam, or USAID's construction of Malawi's Bunda College. Nordic grants helped improve library superstructure. Attempts to coordinate efforts over the years by INASP, the Africana Librarians Council (ALC), and Cooperative Africana Microfilm Project (CAMP) have provided some mentoring, limited book donations, useful preservation projects, and successful lobbying of publishers for better access for African libraries. More recently, there have been efforts to improve African universities' information infrastructure, for instance by the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa and UbuntuNet.3 The need for more effective partnerships has never been more urgent than in today's tight global economy that continues to hit African libraries very hard. I argue that the building of partnerships that combine focused, one-to-one links with wider coordination are one effective way modestly to help lay the foundation for improved library capacity building in Africa. The Importance of Partnerships In the early 200Os, I wrote a series of articles for African Research and Documentation and various other librarianship and African Studies journals,4 emphasising how genuine partnerships with African libraries can help improve information access in and about Africa, as well as our relations with Africans. Librarians are increasingly conscious of the need for effective cooperation, whether in organising Web resources, cooperative cataloguing, shared reference, or consortia to reduce costs and challenge the hegemony of big publishers. I wrote then that: universities and librarians increasingly perceived the benefits of eresources and were developing resources and skills, and forging new international partnerships to optimise their use. I concluded that: This trend will be facilitated by international partnerships but these need to be mutually beneficial if Africans are to benefit from sustainable long-term development. …","PeriodicalId":89063,"journal":{"name":"African research & documentation","volume":"1 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African research & documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00021087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction University partnerships are a growing focus of African Studies programmes,2 often underpinning much project rhetoric. Yet, the vagaries of funding and administration can render projects ineffective or less effective, projects that in any case often neglect libraries. This can be a fatal flaw in project planning because libraries in the North tend to form one of the, if not the, major nerve centres of a university; never more so than today, when the physical library 'neurons' now comprise not just books and journals but a mass of hardware and software. Some administrators make the mistake of imagining 'the library' only in terms of bricks and mortar, and neglect the crucial role of libraries and librarians in identifying, acquiring, classifying and making accessible a wide range of important information resources and related services. In most African countries, neglect of libraries due to limited resources and sometimes policy has had a baneful impact. Therefore, university development projects or partnerships on Africa that neglect libraries and information services do so at their own peril. The case study experiences that I briefly outline below suggest that closer attention to the detail of partnerships and the building of new alliances, not just between librarians in the North and in Africa, but also between academics and librarians in our respective universities can help to improve the effectiveness of African partnerships. Problems of limited resources and administrative decisions can still limit their effectiveness, but such projects can offer a potentially useful way to help render disinterested assistance to libraries in Africa whilst at the same time improving the knowledge and understanding of African libraries by both librarians and academics in the North. Over the years, there have been some very useful, largely ad hoc contacts with, or assistance to, African libraries and archives. To give just three examples: by the British Library's Endangered Archives Programme, by Nordic material aid in Lusaka and Dar es Salaam, or USAID's construction of Malawi's Bunda College. Nordic grants helped improve library superstructure. Attempts to coordinate efforts over the years by INASP, the Africana Librarians Council (ALC), and Cooperative Africana Microfilm Project (CAMP) have provided some mentoring, limited book donations, useful preservation projects, and successful lobbying of publishers for better access for African libraries. More recently, there have been efforts to improve African universities' information infrastructure, for instance by the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa and UbuntuNet.3 The need for more effective partnerships has never been more urgent than in today's tight global economy that continues to hit African libraries very hard. I argue that the building of partnerships that combine focused, one-to-one links with wider coordination are one effective way modestly to help lay the foundation for improved library capacity building in Africa. The Importance of Partnerships In the early 200Os, I wrote a series of articles for African Research and Documentation and various other librarianship and African Studies journals,4 emphasising how genuine partnerships with African libraries can help improve information access in and about Africa, as well as our relations with Africans. Librarians are increasingly conscious of the need for effective cooperation, whether in organising Web resources, cooperative cataloguing, shared reference, or consortia to reduce costs and challenge the hegemony of big publishers. I wrote then that: universities and librarians increasingly perceived the benefits of eresources and were developing resources and skills, and forging new international partnerships to optimise their use. I concluded that: This trend will be facilitated by international partnerships but these need to be mutually beneficial if Africans are to benefit from sustainable long-term development. …
图书馆与图书馆以及图书馆与学术机构的合作:马拉维大学、尼日利亚大学、恩苏卡大学和密歇根州立大学
大学伙伴关系是非洲研究项目日益关注的焦点,2常常是许多项目修辞的基础。然而,资金和管理的变幻莫测可能会使项目无效或效率降低,而这些项目在任何情况下都经常忽视图书馆。这可能是项目规划中的一个致命缺陷,因为北部的图书馆往往是一所大学的主要神经中枢之一,如果不是的话;尤其是今天,实体图书馆的“神经元”不仅包括书籍和期刊,还包括大量的硬件和软件。一些管理人员错误地把“图书馆”想象成砖瓦,而忽视了图书馆和图书馆员在识别、获取、分类和提供大量重要信息资源和相关服务方面的关键作用。在大多数非洲国家,由于资源有限和有时由于政策而忽视图书馆产生了有害的影响。因此,忽视图书馆和信息服务的非洲大学发展项目或伙伴关系是在自担风险。我在下面简要概述的案例研究经验表明,更密切地关注伙伴关系的细节和建立新的联盟,不仅是在北非和非洲的图书馆员之间,而且是在我们各自大学的学术界和图书馆员之间,可以帮助提高非洲伙伴关系的有效性。有限的资源和行政决定的问题仍然会限制它们的有效性,但这些项目可以提供一种潜在的有用方式,帮助向非洲的图书馆提供无私的援助,同时提高北方图书馆员和学者对非洲图书馆的认识和了解。多年来,与非洲图书馆和档案馆进行了一些非常有用的、主要是临时的接触或援助。仅举三个例子:大英图书馆的濒危档案项目,北欧在卢萨卡和达累斯萨拉姆的物资援助,或者美国国际开发署在马拉维建设的本达学院。北欧赠款帮助改善了图书馆的上层建筑。多年来,INASP、非洲图书馆员理事会(ALC)和非洲微型电影合作项目(CAMP)努力协调工作,提供了一些指导、有限的图书捐赠、有用的保存项目,并成功游说出版商为非洲图书馆提供更好的访问渠道。最近,非洲也在努力改善非洲大学的信息基础设施,例如非洲高等教育伙伴关系和优联网在当今紧张的全球经济继续严重打击非洲图书馆的情况下,建立更有效的伙伴关系的需求从未像现在这样迫切。我认为,建立伙伴关系,将重点突出的一对一联系与更广泛的协调结合起来,是一种有效的方式,可以帮助为改善非洲图书馆的能力建设奠定基础。21世纪初,我为《非洲研究与文献》以及其他图书馆和非洲研究期刊撰写了一系列文章,强调与非洲图书馆的真正合作关系如何有助于改善非洲的信息获取和有关非洲的信息,以及我们与非洲人的关系。图书馆员越来越意识到有效合作的必要性,无论是在组织网络资源、合作编目、共享参考,还是为了降低成本和挑战大出版商的霸权而组成的联盟。我当时写道:大学和图书馆员越来越意识到资源的好处,正在开发资源和技能,并建立新的国际伙伴关系,以优化它们的使用。我的结论是:国际伙伴关系将促进这一趋势,但如果非洲人要从可持续的长期发展中受益,这些伙伴关系必须是互利的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信