Influence of the method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Y. Singh, A. L. Molan, V. Ravindran
{"title":"Influence of the method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens","authors":"Y. Singh, A. L. Molan, V. Ravindran","doi":"10.1017/JAN.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted to investigate the effect of method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Fluorescencein situhybridisation analysis was used to characterise the microbiota by using genus-specific probes. Three treatments, namely, ground wheat (GW) or 200 g/kg whole wheat (WW) replacing GW before or after pelleting were evaluated. A total of 144, one-day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were allocated to 18 cages (eight broilers per cage) based on body weight and six cages were randomly assigned to each treatment. The diets were offeredad libitumfrom day 11 to 35 post-hatch. The WW fed birds, regardless of the method of inclusion, resulted in poorer weight gain (P < 0.05) and reduced feed intake (P < 0.001), but a similar feed per gain (P > 0.05) compared to those fed the GW diet. The WW diet, regardless to the method of inclusion, had no effect (P > 0.05) on the populations ofLactobacillusandBacteroides spp.compared with the GW diet. TheBifidobacterium spp.population was higher (P < 0.05) in birds fed the GW diet compared with WW feeding, regardless of the method of inclusion. A reduction (P < 0.05) in the numbers of pathogenicClostridiumandCampylobacter spp.were observed in caecal samples from birds fed WW diets, regardless of method of inclusion, compared with those fed the GW diet, which was attributed to increased gizzard activity. Birds fed WW diets, regardless to the method of inclusion, showed a reduction in gizzard pH (P < 0.05), microbial gas production (P < 0.05), and an increase in gizzard weight (P < 0.05) relative to the GW treatment. The results indicated that the gizzard has an important function as a barrier organ, one that prevents pathogenic bacteria from entering the distal digestive tract.","PeriodicalId":36124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/JAN.2019.3","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JAN.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of method of whole wheat inclusion on performance and caecal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Fluorescencein situhybridisation analysis was used to characterise the microbiota by using genus-specific probes. Three treatments, namely, ground wheat (GW) or 200 g/kg whole wheat (WW) replacing GW before or after pelleting were evaluated. A total of 144, one-day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were allocated to 18 cages (eight broilers per cage) based on body weight and six cages were randomly assigned to each treatment. The diets were offeredad libitumfrom day 11 to 35 post-hatch. The WW fed birds, regardless of the method of inclusion, resulted in poorer weight gain (P < 0.05) and reduced feed intake (P < 0.001), but a similar feed per gain (P > 0.05) compared to those fed the GW diet. The WW diet, regardless to the method of inclusion, had no effect (P > 0.05) on the populations ofLactobacillusandBacteroides spp.compared with the GW diet. TheBifidobacterium spp.population was higher (P < 0.05) in birds fed the GW diet compared with WW feeding, regardless of the method of inclusion. A reduction (P < 0.05) in the numbers of pathogenicClostridiumandCampylobacter spp.were observed in caecal samples from birds fed WW diets, regardless of method of inclusion, compared with those fed the GW diet, which was attributed to increased gizzard activity. Birds fed WW diets, regardless to the method of inclusion, showed a reduction in gizzard pH (P < 0.05), microbial gas production (P < 0.05), and an increase in gizzard weight (P < 0.05) relative to the GW treatment. The results indicated that the gizzard has an important function as a barrier organ, one that prevents pathogenic bacteria from entering the distal digestive tract.
全麦包埋法对肉鸡生产性能和盲肠菌群的影响
本试验旨在研究全麦包埋法对肉鸡生产性能和盲肠菌群的影响。荧光原位杂交分析使用属特异性探针来表征微生物群。在制粒前和制粒后分别用小麦粉(GW)或200 g/kg全麦代替小麦粉(WW) 3种处理进行评价。试验选用1日龄雄性肉仔鸡(Ross 308) 144只,按体重分为18个笼(每笼8只),每个处理随机分配6个笼。在孵化后第11 ~ 35天自由饲喂饲粮。无论采用何种纳入方式,WW饲粮的增重较差(P < 0.05),采食量降低(P < 0.001),但每增重的料重与GW饲粮相当(P < 0.05)。无论采用何种纳入方式,WW日粮与GW日粮相比,对乳酸菌和拟杆菌的种群数量均无显著影响(P < 0.05)。无论采用何种包埋方式,GW饲粮的双歧杆菌数量均高于WW饲粮(P < 0.05)。与饲喂GW日粮的鸟类相比,饲喂WW日粮的鸟类盲肠样品中致病性梭状芽孢杆菌和弯曲杆菌的数量均显著减少(P < 0.05),这是由于砂囊活性增加所致。无论采用何种包埋方式,WW饲粮均较GW处理降低了砂囊pH (P < 0.05)、微生物产气量(P < 0.05),增加了砂囊重量(P < 0.05)。结果表明,砂囊作为屏障器官具有重要功能,可以阻止致病菌进入远端消化道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信