Review of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Influenza

Patrick J. Gavin, Richard B. Thomson Jr.
{"title":"Review of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Influenza","authors":"Patrick J. Gavin,&nbsp;Richard B. Thomson Jr.","doi":"10.1016/S1529-1049(03)00064-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Influenza is unique among viral infections because of its propensity for seasonal epidemics and occasional pandemics, and because of the morbidity and mortality that result from its pulmonary complications. In contrast to the majority of viruses, effective well-tolerated influenza vaccines, antivirals and </span>chemoprophylaxis are available. The need for a timely diagnosis, which allows for optimal use of these treatments, led to the introduction of numerous </span>rapid diagnostic tests<span><span> (with turnaround times of less than 30 minutes). However, during influenza season, clinical diagnosis (based on cough and high fever of acute onset) can be highly predictive of influenza. Thus diagnostic tests are not required for all patients with suspected influenza but may be of value if the clinical diagnosis is unclear and if antiviral or antibiotic treatment is a consideration. When evaluating performance of various rapid diagnostic tests for influenza, it is important to consider the type and quality of specimen and type of patient to be tested. Specimen-type drives performance of the rapid diagnostic tests. Swab specimens, particularly throat swabs are the most frequently submitted but least desirable specimen-type. Thus, although current rapid diagnostic tests are specific for influenza, sensitivity is highly variable. To improve diagnostic accuracy, a nasal/nasopharyngeal aspirate or </span>sputum specimen should be obtained. Because of their highly variable sensitivity and negative predictive value, it is our opinion, that rapid diagnostic tests should only be used in influenza season and that results should be confirmed with virus culture. Despite these reservations, during influenza-season, detection of influenza by rapid diagnostic test may, potentially, be of great benefit to the patient and public health.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":89340,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied immunology reviews","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 151-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1529-1049(03)00064-3","citationCount":"119","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied immunology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529104903000643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119

Abstract

Influenza is unique among viral infections because of its propensity for seasonal epidemics and occasional pandemics, and because of the morbidity and mortality that result from its pulmonary complications. In contrast to the majority of viruses, effective well-tolerated influenza vaccines, antivirals and chemoprophylaxis are available. The need for a timely diagnosis, which allows for optimal use of these treatments, led to the introduction of numerous rapid diagnostic tests (with turnaround times of less than 30 minutes). However, during influenza season, clinical diagnosis (based on cough and high fever of acute onset) can be highly predictive of influenza. Thus diagnostic tests are not required for all patients with suspected influenza but may be of value if the clinical diagnosis is unclear and if antiviral or antibiotic treatment is a consideration. When evaluating performance of various rapid diagnostic tests for influenza, it is important to consider the type and quality of specimen and type of patient to be tested. Specimen-type drives performance of the rapid diagnostic tests. Swab specimens, particularly throat swabs are the most frequently submitted but least desirable specimen-type. Thus, although current rapid diagnostic tests are specific for influenza, sensitivity is highly variable. To improve diagnostic accuracy, a nasal/nasopharyngeal aspirate or sputum specimen should be obtained. Because of their highly variable sensitivity and negative predictive value, it is our opinion, that rapid diagnostic tests should only be used in influenza season and that results should be confirmed with virus culture. Despite these reservations, during influenza-season, detection of influenza by rapid diagnostic test may, potentially, be of great benefit to the patient and public health.

流感快速诊断检测方法综述
流感在病毒感染中是独特的,因为它有季节性流行和偶尔大流行的倾向,也因为它的肺部并发症导致发病率和死亡率。与大多数病毒不同,可获得有效的耐受性良好的流感疫苗、抗病毒药物和化学预防。由于需要及时诊断,以便最佳地利用这些治疗方法,因此引入了许多快速诊断测试(周转时间不到30分钟)。然而,在流感季节,临床诊断(基于急性发作的咳嗽和高烧)可以高度预测流感。因此,并非所有疑似流感患者都需要进行诊断测试,但如果临床诊断不明确,并且考虑进行抗病毒或抗生素治疗,则可能有价值。在评估各种流感快速诊断试验的性能时,重要的是要考虑待测标本的类型和质量以及待测患者的类型。样品型驱动器的快速诊断试验性能。拭子标本,特别是咽拭子是最常提交但最不理想的标本类型。因此,虽然目前的快速诊断测试是针对流感的,但灵敏度变化很大。为了提高诊断的准确性,应获得鼻/鼻咽吸痰或痰标本。由于其高度可变的敏感性和阴性预测价值,我们认为,快速诊断测试应仅在流感季节使用,结果应通过病毒培养来证实。尽管存在这些保留意见,但在流感季节,通过快速诊断测试发现流感可能对患者和公共卫生大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信