Client Satisfaction with the Nutrition Education Component of the California WIC Program

Brenda Nestor , Jeannie McKenzie , Natoiya Hasan , Rayane AbuSabha , Cheryl Achterberg
{"title":"Client Satisfaction with the Nutrition Education Component of the California WIC Program","authors":"Brenda Nestor ,&nbsp;Jeannie McKenzie ,&nbsp;Natoiya Hasan ,&nbsp;Rayane AbuSabha ,&nbsp;Cheryl Achterberg","doi":"10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60171-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Past evaluation research has documented improved nutritional outcomes resulting from participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). However, these evaluations have not examined the program from the clients' perspective, nor have they examined the independent effect of the nutrition education component. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively examine client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program. The methodology consisted of two phases. During phase I of the study (the quantitative component), participants completed Client Satisfaction Surveys immediately following attendance of one nutrition class. During phase II (the qualitative component), four focus groups were conducted. All subjects were participants in the California WIC program. Client Satisfaction Surveys were completed by 2138 participants, and the focus groups included 29 participants. Results from both phases of the study indicated that client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program was high. Between 80% and 95% of participants responded positively to five satisfaction questions, and focus group participants unanimously agreed that the nutrition education was an essential component of the program. Hispanic participants were more likely than non-Hispanic Caucasians, Asians, or African Americans to respond positively to three of the five satisfaction questions. For two of the questions, the frequency of positive responses increased as age increased and decreased as education level increased. A small segment of clients reported some dissatisfaction by responding negatively to one or more of the satisfaction questions (4% to 20% of respondents). Some suggestions for improvement were made by survey respondents. Identification of some WIC participants who are not completely satisfied with the nutrition education that they have received, paired with differences in satisfaction across demographic variables, suggests the need for a personalized approach to WIC nutrition education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60171-1","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404606601711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Past evaluation research has documented improved nutritional outcomes resulting from participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). However, these evaluations have not examined the program from the clients' perspective, nor have they examined the independent effect of the nutrition education component. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively examine client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program. The methodology consisted of two phases. During phase I of the study (the quantitative component), participants completed Client Satisfaction Surveys immediately following attendance of one nutrition class. During phase II (the qualitative component), four focus groups were conducted. All subjects were participants in the California WIC program. Client Satisfaction Surveys were completed by 2138 participants, and the focus groups included 29 participants. Results from both phases of the study indicated that client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program was high. Between 80% and 95% of participants responded positively to five satisfaction questions, and focus group participants unanimously agreed that the nutrition education was an essential component of the program. Hispanic participants were more likely than non-Hispanic Caucasians, Asians, or African Americans to respond positively to three of the five satisfaction questions. For two of the questions, the frequency of positive responses increased as age increased and decreased as education level increased. A small segment of clients reported some dissatisfaction by responding negatively to one or more of the satisfaction questions (4% to 20% of respondents). Some suggestions for improvement were made by survey respondents. Identification of some WIC participants who are not completely satisfied with the nutrition education that they have received, paired with differences in satisfaction across demographic variables, suggests the need for a personalized approach to WIC nutrition education.

客户对加州WIC计划营养教育部分的满意度
过去的评估研究证明,参与妇女、婴儿和儿童特殊补充营养计划(WIC)改善了营养状况。然而,这些评估并没有从客户的角度检查该计划,也没有检查营养教育组成部分的独立效果。本研究的目的是定量和定性地考察客户对加州WIC计划营养教育组成部分的满意度。该方法包括两个阶段。在研究的第一阶段(定量部分),参与者在参加了一个营养课程后立即完成了客户满意度调查。在第二阶段(定性部分),进行了四个焦点小组。所有受试者都是加州WIC项目的参与者。客户满意度调查共有2138名参与者完成,焦点小组包括29名参与者。两个阶段的研究结果表明,客户对加州WIC计划的营养教育部分的满意度很高。80%到95%的参与者对五个满意度问题做出了积极的回应,焦点小组的参与者一致认为营养教育是该计划的重要组成部分。西班牙裔参与者比非西班牙裔白种人、亚洲人或非洲裔美国人更有可能对五个满意度问题中的三个做出积极回应。对于其中两个问题,积极回答的频率随着年龄的增长而增加,随着教育水平的提高而减少。一小部分客户通过对一个或多个满意度问题的负面回答(4%至20%的受访者)来报告一些不满意。调查对象提出了一些改进建议。确定一些WIC参与者对他们所接受的营养教育不完全满意,再加上不同人口变量的满意度差异,表明需要个性化的WIC营养教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信